
Revelation Part 5: The Seven-Sealed Scroll, Part 2 (Revelation 6-7)
(New
American Standard Bible, 1995):
Rev.
6:1 ¶ Then I saw when the
Lamb broke one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures
saying as with a voice of thunder, "Come."
Rev.
6:2 I looked, and behold,
a white horse, and he who sat on it had a bow; and a crown was given to him,
and he went out conquering and to conquer.
Rev.
6:3 ¶ When He broke the
second seal, I heard the second living creature saying, "Come."
Rev.
6:4 And another, a red
horse, went out; and to him who sat on it, it was granted to take peace from
the earth, and that men would
slay one another; and a great sword was given to him.
Rev.
6:5 ¶ When He broke the
third seal, I heard the third living creature saying, "Come." I looked, and
behold, a black horse; and he who sat on it had a pair of scales in his hand.
Rev.
6:6 And I heard
something like a voice in
the center of the four living creatures saying, "A quart of wheat for a
denarius, and three quarts of barley for a denarius; and do not damage the oil
and the wine."
Rev.
6:7 ¶ When the Lamb broke
the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature saying,
"Come."
Rev.
6:8 I looked, and behold,
an ashen horse; and he who sat on it had the name Death; and Hades was
following with him. Authority was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to
kill with sword and with famine and with pestilence and by the wild beasts of
the earth.
Rev.
6:9 ¶ When the Lamb broke
the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been
slain because of the word of God, and because of the testimony which they had
maintained;
Rev.
6:10 and they cried out
with a loud voice, saying, "How long, O Lord, holy and true, will You refrain
from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell on the earth?"
Rev.
6:11 And there was given
to each of them a white robe; and they were told that they should rest for a
little while longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brethren who were to be
killed even as they had been, would be completed also.
Rev.
6:12 ¶ I looked when He
broke the sixth seal, and there was a great earthquake; and the sun became
black as sackcloth made of
hair, and the whole moon became like blood;
Rev.
6:13 and the stars of the
sky fell to the earth, as a fig tree casts its unripe figs when shaken by a
great wind.
Rev.
6:14 The sky was split
apart like a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island were
moved out of their places.
Rev.
6:15 Then the kings of
the earth and the great men and the commanders and the rich and the strong and
every slave and free man hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the
mountains;
Rev.
6:16 and they *said to
the mountains and to the rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the presence of
Him who sits on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb;
Rev.
6:17 for the great day of
their wrath has come, and who is able to stand?"
Rev.
7:1 ¶ After this I saw
four angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding back the four
winds of the earth, so that no wind would blow on the earth or on the sea or on
any tree.
Rev.
7:2 And I saw another
angel ascending from the rising of the sun, having the seal of the living God;
and he cried out with a loud voice to the four angels to whom it was granted to
harm the earth and the sea,
Rev.
7:3 saying, "Do not harm
the earth or the sea or the trees until we have sealed the bond-servants of our
God on their foreheads."
Rev.
7:4 ¶ And I heard the
number of those who were sealed, one hundred and forty-four thousand sealed
from every tribe of the sons of Israel:
Rev.
7:5 ¶ From the tribe of
Judah, twelve thousand were sealed, from the tribe of Reuben twelve thousand, from the tribe
of Gad twelve thousand,
Rev.
7:6 from the tribe of
Asher twelve thousand, from the tribe of Naphtali twelve thousand, from the
tribe of Manasseh twelve thousand,
Rev.
7:7 from the tribe of
Simeon twelve thousand, from the tribe of Levi twelve thousand, from the tribe
of Issachar twelve thousand,
Rev.
7:8 from the tribe of
Zebulun twelve thousand, from the tribe of Joseph twelve thousand, from the
tribe of Benjamin, twelve thousand were sealed.
Rev.
7:9 ¶ After these things
I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could count, from every
nation and all tribes
and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb,
clothed in white robes, and palm branches were in their hands;
Rev.
7:10 and they cry out
with a loud voice, saying,
¶ "Salvation to
our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb."
Rev.
7:11 And all the angels
were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures; and they fell on
their faces before the throne and worshiped God,
Rev.
7:12 saying,
¶ "Amen, blessing
and glory and wisdom and thanksgiving and honor and power and might, be to our God forever and ever. Amen."
Rev.
7:13 ¶ Then one of the
elders answered, saying to me, "These who are clothed in the white robes, who
are they, and where have they come from?"
Rev.
7:14 I said to him, "My
lord, you know." And he said to me, "These are the ones who come out of the
great tribulation, and they have washed their robes and made them white in the
blood of the Lamb.
Rev.
7:15 "For this reason,
they are before the throne of God; and they serve Him day and night in His
temple; and He who sits on the throne will spread His tabernacle over them.
Rev.
7:16 "They will hunger no
longer, nor thirst anymore; nor will the sun beat down on them, nor any heat;
Rev.
7:17 for the Lamb in the
center of the throne will be their shepherd, and will guide them to springs of
the water of life; and God will wipe every tear from their eyes."
Novum Testamentum Graece (New Testament
in Greek)
Nestle-Aland, 27th Edition, prepared by
Institut für neutestamentliche Testforschung Münster/Westfalen, Barbara and
Kurt Aland (Editors). Copyright © 1898 and 1993 by Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft,
Stuttgart.
Used by permission.
Morphological tagging by William D.
Mounce and Rex A. Koivisto
Copyright © 2003 William D. Mounce.
Copyright © 2006 OakTree Software, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Version 3.3
(You must have the Helena font installed
in order to see the Greek text rendered correctly; it can be obtained here: http://www.accordancebible.com/)
Rev.
6:1 ¼
Kai« ei€don o¢te h¡noixe to\ aÓrni÷on mi÷an e™k tw×n sfragidwn, kai« h¡kousa
ešno\ß e™k tw×n tessa¿rwn zw¿wn le÷gontoß, wJß fwnhvß bronthvß, ŽErcou kai«
ble÷pe.
Rev.
6:2
kai« ei€don, kai« i™dou/, iºppoß leuko/ß, kai« oJ kaqh/menoß e™p aujtw–× e¶cwn
to/xon: kai« e™do/qh aujtw–× ste÷fanoß, kai« e™xhvlqe nikw×n, kai« iºna
nikh/shØ.
Rev.
6:3 ¼
Kai« o¢te h¡noixe th\n deute÷ran sfragiˆda, h¡kousa touv deute÷rou zw¿ou
le÷gontoß, ŽErcou kai« ble÷pe.
Rev.
6:4
kai« e™xhvlqen aýlloß iºppoß purro/ß: kai« tw–× kaqhme÷nw– e™p aujtw–× e™do/qh
aujtw–× labeiˆn th\n ei™rh/nhn aÓpo\ thvß ghvß, kai« iºna aÓllh/louß sfaxwsi:
kai« e™do/qh aujtw–× ma¿caira mega¿lh.
Rev.
6:5 ¼
Kai« o¢te h¡noixe th\n tri÷thn sfragiˆda, h¡kousa touv tri÷tou zw¿ou le÷gontoß,
ŽErcou kai« ble÷pe, kai« ei€don, kai« i™dou/, iºppoß melaß, kai« oJ kaqh/menoß
e™p aujtw–× e¶cwn zugo\n e™n thØv ceiri« aujtouv.
Rev.
6:6
kai« h¡kousa fwnh\n e™n me÷sw– tw×n tessa¿rwn zw¿wn le÷gousan, Coiˆnix si÷tou
dhnari÷ou, kai« treiˆß coi÷nikeß kriqhvß dhnari÷ou: kai« to\ e¶laion kai« to\n
oi€non mh\ aÓdikh/shØß.
Rev.
6:7 ¼
Kai« o¢te h¡noixe th\n sfragiˆda th\n teta¿rthn, h¡kousa fwnh\n touv tetartou
zw¿ou le÷gousan, ŽErcou kai« ble÷pe.
Rev.
6:8
kai« ei€don, kai« i™dou/, iºppoß clwro/ß, kai« oJ kaqh/menoß e™pa¿nw aujtouv,
o¡noma aujtw–× oJ qa¿natoß, kai« oJ a–’dhß aÓkolou/qei met aujtouv. kai«
e™do/qh aujtoiˆß e™xousi÷a aÓpokteiˆnai e™pi« to\ te÷tarton thvß ghvß e™n
rJomfai÷a– kai« e™n limw–×–× kai« e™n qana¿tw–, kai« uJpo\ tw×n qhri÷wn thvß
ghvß.
Rev.
6:9 ¼
Kai« o¢te h¡noixe th\n pe÷mpthn sfragiˆda, ei€don uJpoka¿tw touv qusiasthri÷ou
ta»ß yuca»ß tw×n e™sfagme÷nwn dia» to\n lo/gon touv Qeouv, kai« dia» th\n
marturi÷an h§n ei€con,
Rev.
6:10
kai« e¶kraxan fwnhØv mega¿lhØ, le÷gonteß, ðEwß po/te, oJ despo/thß, oJ a’gioß
kai« oJ aÓlhqino/ß, ouj kri÷neiß kai« e™kdikeiˆß to\ aima hJmw×n aÓpo\ tw×n
katoikou/ntwn e™pi« thvß ghvß;
Rev.
6:11
kai« e™do/qhsan eška¿stoiß sto/lai leukai÷, kai« e™rre÷qh aujtoiˆß iºna
aÓnapau/swntai e¶ti cro/non mikro/n, eºwß ouƒ plhrw¿sontai kai« oiš su/ndouloi
aujtw×n kai« oiš aÓdelfoi« aujtw×n, oiš me÷llonteß aÓpokteine÷sqai wJß kai«
aujtoi÷.
Rev.
6:12 ¼
Kai« ei€don o¢te h¡noixe th\n sfragiˆda th\n eºkthn, kai« i™dou/, seismo\ß
me÷gaß e™ge÷neto, kai« oJ h¢lioß e™ge÷neto me÷laß wJß sa¿kkoß tri÷cinoß, kai«
hJ selh/nh e™ge÷neto wJß aima,
Rev.
6:13
kai« oiš aÓste÷reß touv oujranouv e¶pesan ei™ß th\n ghvn, wJß sukhv ba¿llei
tou\ß ojlu/nqouß aujthvß, uJpo\ mega¿lou aÓne÷mou seiome÷nh.
Rev.
6:14
kai« oujrano\ß aÓpecwri÷sqh wJß bibli÷on eišlisso/menon, kai« pa×n o¡roß kai«
nhvsoß e™k tw×n to/pwn aujtw×n e™kinh/qhsan.
Rev.
6:15
kai« oiš basileiˆß thvß ghvß, kai« oiš megista×neß, kai« oiš plou/sioi, kai«
oiš cili÷arcoi, kai« oiš dunatoi÷, kai« pa×ß douvloß kai« pa×ß e™leu/qeroß,
e¶kruyan ešautou\ß ei™ß ta» sph/laia kai« ei™ß ta»ß pe÷traß tw×n ojre÷wn,
Rev.
6:16
kai« le÷gousi toiˆß o¡resi kai« taiˆß petraiß, Pe÷sete e™f hJma×ß, kai«
kru/yate hJma×ß aÓpo\ prosw¿pou touv kaqhme÷nou e™pi« touv qro/nou, kai« aÓpo\
thvß ojrghvß touv aÓrni÷ou:
Rev.
6:17
o¢ti hlqen hJ hJme÷ra hJ mega¿lh thvß ojrghvß aujtouv, kai« ti÷ß du/natai
staqhvnai;
Rev.
7:1 ¼
Kai« meta» tauvta ei€don te÷ssaraß aÓgge÷louß ešstw×taß e™pi« ta»ß te÷ssaraß
gwni÷aß thvß ghvß, kratouvntaß tou\ß te÷ssaraß aÓne÷mouß thvß ghvß, iºna mh\
pne÷hØ aýnemoß e™pi« thvß ghvß, mh/te e™pi« thvß qala¿sshß, mh/te e™pi« pa×n
de÷ndron.
Rev.
7:2
kai« ei€don aýllon aýggelon aÓnabai÷nonta aÓpo\ aÓnatolhvß hJli÷ou, e¶conta
sfragiˆda Qeouv zw×ntoß: kai« e¶kraxe fwnhØv mega¿lhØ toiˆß te÷ssarsin
aÓgge÷loiß, oiß e™do/qh aujtoiˆß aÓdikhvsai th\n ghvn kai« th\n qa¿lassan,
Rev.
7:3
le÷gwn. Mh\ aÓdikh/shte th\n ghvn, mh/te th\n qa¿lassan, mh/te ta» de÷ndra,
aýcriß ouƒ sfragi÷swmen tou\ß dou/louß touv Qeouv hJmw×n e™pi« tw×n metw¿pwn
aujtw×n.
Rev.
7:4
kai« h¡kousa to\n aÓriqmo\n tw×n e™sfragisme÷nwn, rmdá cilia¿deß,
e™sfragisme÷noi e™k pa¿shß fulhvß uišw×n Israh/l.
Rev.
7:5 ¼
e™k fulhvß Iou/da, ibá cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi: ¼ e™k fulhvß ÔRoubh/n, ibá
cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi: ¼ e™k fulhvß Ga¿d, ibá cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi:
Rev.
7:6 ¼
e™k fulhvß Ash/r, ibá cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi: ¼ e™k fulhvß Nefqalei÷m, ibá
cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi: ¼ e™k fulhvß Manasshv: ibá cilia¿deß
e™sfragisme÷noi:
Rev.
7:7 ¼
e™k fulhvß Sumew¿n, ibá cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi: ¼ e™k fulhvß Leui‘, ibá cilia¿deß
e™sfragisme÷noi: ¼ e™k fulhvß Isaca¿r, ibá cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi:
Rev.
7:8 ¼
e™k fulhvß Zaboulw¿n, ibá cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi: ¼ e™k fulhvß Iwsh/f, ibá
cilia¿deß e™sfragisme÷noi: ¼ e™k fulhvß Beniami÷n, ibá cilia¿deß
e™sfragisme÷noi.
Rev.
7:9 ¼
Meta» tauvta ei€don, kai« i™dou/, o¡cloß polu/ß, o§n aÓriqmhvsai aujto\n
oujdei«ß hjdu/nato, e™k panto\ß e¶qnouß kai« fulw×n kai« law×n kai« glwssw×n,
ešstw×teß e™nw¿pion touv qro/nou kai« e™nw¿pion touv aÓrni÷ou, peribeblhme÷noi
stola»ß leuka»ß, kai« foi÷nikeß e™n taiˆß cersi«n aujtw×n:
Rev.
7:10
kai« kra¿zonteß fwnhØv mega¿lhØ le÷gonteß, ÔH swthri÷a tw–× Qew–× hJmw×n tw–×
kaqhme÷nw– e™pi« touv qro/nou, kai« tw–× aÓrni÷w–.
Rev.
7:11
kai« pa¿nteß oiš aýggeloi ešsth/kesan ku/klw– touv qro/nou kai« tw×n
presbute÷rwn kai« tw×n tessa¿rwn zw¿wn, kai« e¶peson e™nw¿pion touv qro/nou
e™pi« pro/swpon aujtw×n, kai« proseku/nhsan tw–× Qew–×,
Rev.
7:12
le÷gonteß, Amh/n: hJ eujlogi÷a kai« hJ do/xa kai« hJ sofi÷a kai« hJ
eujcaristi÷a kai« hJ timh\ kai« hJ du/namiß kai« hJ i™scu\ß tw–× Qew–× hJmw×n
ei™ß tou\ß ai™w×naß tw×n ai™w¿nwn. aÓmh/n.
Rev.
7:13 ¼
Kai« aÓpekri÷qh eiß e™k tw×n presbute÷rwn, le÷gwn moi, Ouƒtoi oiš
peribeblhme÷noi ta»ß stola»ß ta»ß leuka»ß, ti÷neß ei™si÷, kai« po/qen hlqon;
Rev.
7:14
kai« ei¶rhka aujtw–×, Ku/rie, su\ oi€daß. kai« ei€pe÷ moi, Ouƒtoi÷ ei™sin oiš
e™rco/menoi e™k thvß qli÷yewß thvß mega¿lhß, kai« e¶plunan ta»ß stola»ß
aujtw×n, kai« e™leu/kanan aujta»ß e™n tw–× aiºmati touv aÓrni÷ou.
Rev.
7:15
dia» touvto/ ei™sin e™nw¿pion touv qro/nou touv Qeouv, kai« latreu/ousin
aujtw–× hJme÷raß kai« nukto\ß e™n tw–× naw–× aujtouv: kai« oJ kaqh/menoß e™pi«
touv qro/nou skhnw¿sei e™p aujtou/ß.
Rev.
7:16
ouj peina¿sousin e¶ti, oujde« diyh/sousin e¶ti, oujde« mh\ pe÷shØ e™p aujtou\ß
oJ h¢lioß, oujde« pa×n kauvma:
Rev.
7:17
o¢ti to\ aÓrni÷on to\ aÓna» me÷son touv qro/nou poimaneiˆ aujtou/ß, kai«
oJdhgh/sei aujtou\ß e™pi« zw¿saß phga»ß uJda¿twn, kai« e™xalei÷yei oJ Qeo\ß
pa×n da¿kruon aÓpo\ tw×n ojfqalmw×n aujtw×n.
Lesson Outline
Revelation 6-7: The Opening of Seals 1-6
This is the second half of a two-part study of "The Seven Sealed Scroll," chapters 4-7. There is a definite break in the scripture between chapters 3 and 4; the futurist view holds that chapters 1-3 were fulfilled during John's time, while 4-21 will be fulfilled in a compacted length of time at some date in the future. Chapter 4 and 5 serve as an introduction to the extended and primary set of revelations seen in chapters 6-20.
The "four living creatures" spoken of from the beginning of this passage are cherubim, one of the exalted orders of angels.
The sealed scroll, handed down to Christ in Rev. 5, details how He will reclaim his earthly creation from the evil that is "walking back and forth" upon it. (Job 1:7, 2:2) The opening of this scroll is thought by some commentators to represent the period of the Great Tribulation, that period Jesus spoke of in his Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24-25), and by Paul in 1 Thessalonians, as well as references by OT prophets; Jer. 30:7, Isa. 34:1-4, and Daniel 9, for just a few examples.
The first four seals opened represent the "birth pains" Jesus spoke of in the Olivet Discourse. The time is not immediate for the end of the world, but it is approaching fast as the intensity of God's judgment increases.
John MacArthur talks about something quite fascinating about the first rider (the pale horse), who is usually, and mistakenly, identified as Christ Himself. He points out that the rider has a bow but no arrows to shoot from it, and has a crown that was freely given to him. This indicates it is someone freely elected how ends up bringing destruction, not someone who seizes power by force. He goes on to mention one prominent example of this already happening in the secular world, Adolf Hitler, who was freely elected to power by the German people in 1932, even after writing a book (in 1923) that outlined in detail precisely what he intended to do.
The "Day of the Lord" is mentioned 23 times in scripture (19 OT, 4 NT), an event that seems to actually come in 2 parts separated by the Millennial Reign of Christ (1 Thess 5:2 and 2 Pet 3:10), and to come as a complete surprise to all on earth. The 6th Seal is one part of this, God himself acting instead of through intermediaries. Each seal opened represents increasingly disastrous events for those on earth, and each is more and more obviously the work of the Lord. However, due to the actions of the Antichrist and his followers in the false religion he sets up around him, most unbelievers will refuse to believe this is so, and will continue to insist that what is happening is the result of "Mother Nature" or man's own efforts. Think about the current debates about "global warming," and its adherents insisting that men not only have the potential power to "destroy" the earth, they are actively engaged in doing so at the moment.
While there are many, many explanations about what these judgments represent (probably as many opinions as there have been commentaries written about Revelation), let me suggest that most of these great disasters are not entirely merely a punishment from God, but a partial outpouring of His wrath on evil combined with a measured attempt to bring the remaining lost to a saving knowledge of Christ. Why else would He do this? If His intent was to bring about the Tribulation destruction at a time when He had determined that all who would come to Him already had, then why bring such wrath and tortures on those who He foreknew would not?
This is why I am beginning to see a clear path in scripture that there may not be a pretribunal rapturing of the church. God uses various means to bring men to an understanding of the Creator, and to a saving knowledge of his Son. I suggest that these initial Seal wraths are God's final warnings, so to speak, increasing in volume and intensity so that by the 6th Seal they are very obviously products of a metaphysical and omnipotent God. God never once promised to take His faithful children out of danger or away from hardship; His consistent promise is that He will always walk with you through toil and danger. Who better, then, to leave in place during these most troubling of times, than the saints who through their faith and witness, can lead those "last to go" on to a saving faith in Jesus Christ?
That said, when I consider just how difficult these times promise to be, I very much hope I am wrong, and those called by His name for His purposes will indeed be raptured up out of the way!
Dr. Constable's Charts





IVP-Hard Sayings of the Bible
7:4 Who Are the 144,000?
The
doorbell rings on a Saturday morning and two people stand on the porch offering
literature about the return of Christ. If questioned, they might reveal that
they are Jehovah's Witnesses. Their motives for their door-to-door activity are
not simply to gain converts for the movement, but rather to gain merit for
themselves through their exemplary zeal. Their hope (faint though it may be,
given the number of Witnesses worldwide) might be to become one of the 144,000
who will reign with Christ. While there are certainly a number of more
important places at which orthodox Christians would take issue with these
Witnesses in terms of doctrine, what they say about the 144,000 remains
troubling, not because it is believed, but because we ourselves do not know what
this number means.
The
problem with the number is that it is clearly symbolic, but the question is,
Symbolic of what? Three major scholarly options have been given. The first is
that this figure is symbolic of a group of Jews whom God will redeem at the end
of the age. The second is that this is symbolic of a group of martyrs whom God
preserves for martyrdom. The third is that this number is symbolic of the whole
of the church, which God will protect through the tribulation at the end of the
age. Only an examination of the data will show which of these is most likely to
be correct.
John's
picture draws on two Old Testament images. The first is that of Passover (Ex
12:1213), during which the blood on the doorposts of the Hebrews' homes was a
sign protecting them from the judgment that the Egyptians were receiving. The
significant elements in Exodus are that the world around the Hebrews was
experiencing judgment and a God-given sign protected the people of God from
this judgment. The second Old Testament image is that of Ezekiel's man with an
ink horn (Ezek 9). Again, the context is one of judgment. Again the people true
to God are marked to be spared. In this case "a man clothed with linen who had
a writing kit at his side" goes through the city and marks a Hebrew taäw, which in
those days was an x or a +, on the forehead of each person faithful to God.
There
may also be a New Testament background for John's picture. In 2 Corinthians
1:22, Ephesians 1:13 and Ephesians 4:30, Paul writes that Christians are sealed
with the Holy Spirit. While the Spirit is not said to protect believers from
anything, the image is one of security. Likewise, "the Lord knows those who are
his" stands as a seal in 2 Timothy 2:19. While there is no evidence that John
had read any of these books, the fact that Paul used sealing language implies
that it was used around the church before John wrote.
In
the picture in Revelation 7 the judgment of God announced in Revelation 6 is
held back until the sealing is complete. The sealed are identified as "the
servants of our God." The image is that of Ezekiel, both in the placement of
the seal on the forehead and in the idea of only a remnant (in Ezekiel a
remnant of Israel) being sealed from the judgment. This theme is picked up
again in Revelation 9:4 in the fifth of the trumpet judgments, in which the
"locusts" are to hurt only those "who did not have the seal of God on their
foreheads." The sealed are protected in the midst of judgment all around them.
In
Revelation 14 the 144,000 are "the 144,000 who had been redeemed from the
earth." They are described as celibate virgins, which in Revelation means that
they have not been seduced by the forces of evil nor made a compromise with
idolatry. They are also totally truthful. "They were purchased from among men
and offered as firstfruits to God and the Lamb" (Rev 14:4). The firstfuit
picture appears in James 1:18 for all Christians in relation to the world and
in Romans 11:16 for Gentile believers in relation to the full repentance of
Israel.
Who
are these 144,000, then? The theory that they are the martyrs of the last days
is attractive, but in the end unconvincing because nothing is said in these
passages of their being martyrs. Instead it appears that all of the
"servants of God" are sealed. These "servants" are part of a larger group that
is not serving God. That many of these folk might become martyrs is reasonable,
given the persecution described in Revelation 13, but John says nothing to make
us think that they are exclusively martyrs.
The
theory that they are the Jewish believers of the end time is also attractive
since the tribes of Israel are named. However, there are also problems here.
Both the order of the tribal list and the names included are unusual. For
example, both Manasseh and his father, Joseph, are included (Joseph apparently
standing for Ephraim). Dan is missing, although he is present in Ezekiel's
end-time list (Ezek 48). Thus John appears to indicate that the list stands for
something other than any known form of Israel. Yet another problem is that most
of "Israel" is not saved (that is, is not in the 144,000), while Paul's
expectation (Rom 11:26) is that "all Israel will be saved." If both John and
Paul have versions of Christian expectation about the Jews, there must have
been two competing expectations in the early church. Finally, in Revelation 7
these folk are called simply the "servants of God," which is not a term unique
to Jewish believers. Likewise the description of them in Revelation 14 could
fit any believer who is faithful to God and does not compromise with the
"beast" and the "false prophet." In Revelation 9 all who are not sealed are
tormented. Does this mean that Gentile believers are tormented while Jewish
ones are not? And doesn't a Jew-Gentile distinction within the church run counter
to all of Paul's arguments about God's breaking down the walls between the
races? These reasons persuade me that this cannot be the correct explanation.
The
144,000, then, stand for God's faithful people, Jew or Gentile. They are, just
as the text says, "the servants of our God." The image of Israel is probably
drawn from the picture in Ezekiel 9. Just as all of the tribes of Israel
present in Jerusalem (the last stand of Judaism before the exile) were included
then, so all of the tribes of humanity will be included in the end. The 12 X 12
X 1000 stresses the completeness of this number; all of God's servants from all
of humanity are sealed. The purpose of their sealing is to protect them not
from temptation or martyrdom, but from the judgment of God. This is God's
church of the end times, when God's judgment is coming to a peak. Since they
are faithful, there is no reason for judgment to fall upon them. In Revelation
7 the image of the 144,000 protected on earth is coupled with a parallel image
of the church in heaven, an encouragement to persevere. In Revelation 14 the
144,000 are in heaven, for in the same chapter is the harvest of the earth. The
final judgments, which will destroy everything and everyone in their path, are
about to begin. No wonder that the church is withdrawn before that final
curtain comes down.
What does this image say to the church today? On the assumption that we live in the last days (which in New Testament thought runs from the time of Christ to the end), our Jehovah's Witness friends are right to wish to be numbered in the 144,000. The sad thing is that they are going about it the wrong way. It is not a limited number to which one gains entrance by merit, but the complete number of God's faithful servants. One is counted in that number if he or she does not compromise the faith by going after the idols of the world and does not live in falsehood, but speaks and lives in truth. Another way of putting it is that "they follow the Lamb wherever he goes" (Rev 14:4). In the context of Revelation this means that they follow him in heaven (and perhaps in his conquest of earth in Rev 19), but they do so in heaven because they have already been his followers on earth, whatever the cost.
IVP-New Bible Commentary
6:1-8:5 The seven seals
Many
complex elements flow together to form the panorama which the prophet now
describes. The conviction that judgments will precede the coming of the kingdom
of God is rooted in the teaching of the OT prophets concerning the day of the
Lord (see e.g. Is. 13, 34; Je. 4-7; Ezk. 7, 25; Am. 5:18-29; Zp. 1-3). John has
elaborated and schematized them in a unique manner, but the division of the
Messianic woes into several sets of sevens may well be inspired by the doom
prophecy of Lv. 26, where it is stated four times, ŒI will punish you for your
sins seven times over' (18, 21, 24, 28). The discourse on the end times in the
gospels (Mt. 24; Mk. 13, Lk. 21) contains the seven judgments enumerated in
Rev. 6, but the form of the opening four judgments reflects the vision of four
chariots and horses in Zechariah (cf. Zc. 1:7-17), adapted by John
to convey his message. Note that while the opening of the seals brings
judgments, these are but the precursors of the final kingdom of God. The scroll
represents God's covenant to give humanity the kingdom of salvation.
6:1-2 The first seal
The command ŒCome!' is directed to the rider who
appears at the opening of the seal (the same is true in vs 3, 5, 7). Many
interpreters regard the conquering horseman as Christ and link the passage with
the vision of the returning Lord in 19:11-12. The only element in common in the
two pictures, however, is the white horse, a symbol of victory. Others hold
that the rider represents the triumph of the gospel, and cite Mk. 13:10. (2
Thes. 2:7 is also interpreted in this light.) Nevertheless, in view of the
evident similarity of the four horsemen, it seems more natural to interpret all
four as symbolizing judgments. This rider appears to signify an overwhelmingly
powerful military force.
6:3-4 The second seal
The rider on the fiery red horse also denotes a warring
power. If it is to be asked how he differs from the first, the language
suggests that the first rider represents an army invading other countries; the
second a general confusion of strife, including hostilities between countries,
and perhaps even civil war (...to make men slay each other). Note the
double reference to war in Mk. 13:7-8 and parallels.
6:5-6 The third seal
The rider on a black horse denotes famine. The balance
in his hand suggests scarcity of food, the prices quoted are prohibitive. The
NIV rightly paraphrases the term denarius as Œa day's wages' (cf. Mt. 20:1-2).
A quart of wheat would suffice for a man's daily ration, leaving nothing, however,
for his family. Three quarts of barley would go further, but it
would still remain a bare subsistence allowance. On the other hand, do not
damage the oil and wine reflects a concern to give priority to such for
those who could afford them. In AD 92, shortly before the writing of
Revelation, an acute shortage of cereals, together with an abundance of wine in
the empire, caused Domitian to order the restriction of wine cultivation and an
increase of corn growing; the order created such a furore it had to be
abandoned. The text may have such a situation in mind.
6:7-8 The fourth seal
The fourth rider is named Death, but it is
likely that it represents a special kind of death, namely pestilence. Ezekiel
tells of God's four sore acts of judgment: sword, famine, evil beasts and
pestilence (Ezk. 4:21), and the Greek translation renders the last by the term death
(possibly John does the same in 2:23, and certainly in 18:8). That
Hades was following close behind is a reminder that death does not
end life's story; judgment awaits sinners (cf. Heb.
9:27-28).
6:9-11 The fifth seal
The souls of the martyrs were under the altar because they
had been, as it were, Œsacrificed' (cf. Phil. 2:17; 2 Tim. 4:6). The
thought was beloved by the Jews. Rabbi Akiba taught: ŒHe who is buried in the
land of Israel is as if he were buried beneath the altar, for the whole land of
Israel is appropriated for the altar; he who is buried beneath the altar is as
if he were buried beneath the throne of glory.' In the light of 12:17 the
testimony the martyrs had maintained is the testimony of Jesus
(see also 1:2 and 19:10).
10-11 The white
robe given to them is likely to be a representation of their
justification through Christ in face of their condemnation by the world, and so
a sign and pledge of the glory which is to be theirs in the Œfirst
resurrection' (20:4-6). This vision of the martyrs is viewed as an integral
part of the judgments of the Lord, for the prayer for justice (10) is answered,
and the end thereby hastened.
6:12-27 The sixth seal
The description of the cosmic signs at the end of the age is drawn
from a number of OT passages that speak of the day of the Lord (for a great
earthquake as a sign of the end, cf. Ezk. 38:19-20; for the sun
turning black like sackcloth and the moon blood red see Is.
13:10; Ezk. 32:7-8; Joel 2:10; 3:15; for the falling stars and the
rolling up of the sky like a scroll see Is. 34:4; for the hiding in
the rocks see Is. 2:10; and for prayer to [p. 1435] the
mountains see Ho. 10:8). These Œsigns' are indications not that the end is
drawing near but that it has arrived (so v 17, the great day of their wrath
has come). They originally were pictorial expressions of the terror of the
universe before the majesty of the Creator as he steps forth in judgment and
deliverance (see especially Hab. 3:6-11), and so served to magnify the
awesomeness of the Lord in his theophany.
15-17 These
verses give a sevenfold classification of humankind, ranging from the kings
of the earth to every slave and every free man. Their cry in
vs 16-17 is a counterpart to that of the martyrs beneath the altar. The last
day reveals the identity of him who has ultimate authority over the universe
and the irresistible judgment of the Lamb; but the end of their exercise of
authority and judgment is the triumph of the kingdom of grace and glory (see
21:1-22:5).
7:1-17 An interlude between the sixth and seventh seals
The sixth seal heralded the end of history in the coming of God
and the Lamb. One expects the seventh seal to be opened now and the kingdom of
glory to be revealed. Instead John recounts two visions of God's people in the
last days. The first relates to the period prior to the judgments described in
ch. 6; the second reveals the redeemed in the glory that follows them. John's
purpose is to assure his Christian readers (and hearers!; 1:3) that they have
no need to dread the judgments of the last times since God will protect them.
It
is often thought that the two halves of the chapter relate to two different
companies of people, so that vs 1-8 show God's care for Israel in the last
times, or at least for Jewish Christians, whereas vs 9-17 depict the saved of
the nations of the world. This is a doubtful interpretation. If the Œsealing'
of the first vision portrays God's protection from the destructive judgments
coming on the earth, then all God's people will need that, not a limited
section of them (and that is done; see 9:4). Moreover, the expression the
servants of our God, who are sealed (3) occurs elsewhere in Revelation, and regularly
denotes the whole company of the redeemed (see 2:20; 11:18; 19:2, 5; 22:3, 6).
It is likely that John was guided to employ a prophecy that originally was
intended to assure Jews of the certainty of their inheritance in the kingdom of
God. He applied it to the church as the new Israel, since its symbolism thereby
comes to perfect realization (for the church as the new Israel see Rom.
2:28-29; Gal. 3:29; 6:16; Phil. 3:3; 1 Pet. 1:1; 2:9).
1 After this marks a new vision; it is not a note
of time in relation to the events narrated in ch. 6 but introduces a fresh
revelation given to John. The four angels... holding back the four winds of
the earth are an alternative symbol of the four horsemen of the previous
chapter (so in Zc. 6:5). The destructive fury of the winds represents the whole
manifestation of judgment symbolized by the seals, trumpets and cups of wrath. 2-3
The picture of the seal of the living God applied to the servants
of God goes back to Ezekiel's vision of the man with a writing kit, who is told
to go through Jerusalem and put a mark on the foreheads of the righteous that
they may be spared by the agents of destruction (Ezk. 9:1-6).
4-8 The
enumeration of the tribes one by one serves to emphasize the completeness of
the number of God's saints for whom he cares during the coming trials. The list
is unusual in several respects. Judah comes first, instead of Reuben, Jacob's
firstborn (Gn. 29:32; cf. Nu. 13:4-15; Dt. 33:6); this
doubtless is due to the recognition that Judah is the tribe of the Messiah. Dan
is omitted, but Manasseh appears, although the latter is included in Joseph.
This is certainly deliberate. Jewish teachers persistently associated Dan with
idolatry. In ŒThe Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs' Dan is told, ŒYour
prince is Satan'. From Irenaeus on it was maintained among Christians that
Dan's name was omitted because the antichrist was to come from his tribe. This
was, of course, the view of Jews, but in reality the representations of the
antichrist in Revelation are irreconcilable with it.
9 The vision
of the 144,000 sealed against the effects of trial is replaced by that of a
great multitude that noone could count, standing before God and the Lamb
in the glory of the kingdom. A. M. Farrer considered that this contrast gives
expression to two complementary themes of the Scriptures: on the one hand that
God knows the number of his elect, and on the other, that those who inherit the
blessing of Abraham are numberless as the stars (The Revelation of St. John
the Divine [Clarendon, 1964], p. 110). Their white robes signify
purity and resurrection glory, the palm branches victory and
joy after war.
10 Salvation belongs to our God... and to the Lamb echoes Ps.
3:8 (see also Rev. 19:1). The victors ascribe their redemption to God and the
Lamb. 12 The praise of the angelic orders reflects the praise of the
redeemed multitude.
13-14 John's
answer to the elder's question implies, ŒI also would like to know'. The
great tribulation out of which the multitude has come is not a general designation
of the trials which are the Christian's normal lot, but the tribulation that
occurs at the close of this age. The vision depicts the scene after the
cessation of the [p. 1436] judgments of the Lord within history and the
sufferings of Christians at the hands of the opponents of God, and so has in
view the last generation. Yet the elder's statement in vs 14b-17 describes the
blessedness of the whole church. The difficulty is relieved if we remember that
John prophesies of a day that to him is almost on the horizon; it was not given
to him to see the period that intervened before the end. The last persecution
may come at any time. Those who have gone before, having witnessed a good
confession, are of course included in this throng, but it was superfluous to
state that. The church of the present is the subject in view, and its situation
fills John's canvas. For us, nearly two millennia later, the church is mainly
in heaven, but we may know that all believers, including ourselves, will be
among that throng.
They have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb is a symbolic expression of the forgiveness of sins through faith in the Christ who died for all. The phrase the blood of the Lamb is a shorthand expression for the death of Christ viewed as a sacrifice for sins, hence the imagery of v 14 depicts the effectiveness of the Lord's redemption in the lives of his people. It includes the overcoming of sin in life by virtue of the power of Christ's atonement and so covers the whole of life's pilgrimage, as well as the event of conversion. Vs 16-17 use language drawn from Is. 29:8 and 49:10: Christ assuages people's thirst by providing in himself the antidote to their restlessness, the complete counterpart to their unsatisfied desires. The springs of living water in the final vision of the city of God turn out to be a river of living water (22:1-2)‹more than enough for the needs of all!
6:1-8
The Four Horsemen
The imagery is adapted from the angelic horsemen sent by God to
patrol the earth in Zechariah 1:8-11 and 6:1-8, though used in a different way.
(Some scholars suggest that the horsemen portray angels of judgment, others
symbols for Christ coming in judgments, and still others simply symbols for
judgments in general.) Although divine judgments in history are a major Old
Testament theme, pagans also recognized and would have understood John's point;
most cultures in history have recognized the existence of divine judgments.
Jewish apocalyptic traditions associated some of these judgments, such as war
and famine, with the time just preceding the end of the age; cf. Matthew
24:6-8.
6:1. A document could not
be opened until all the seals were broken (i.e., in Revelation, after 8:1); the
seals (in this case judgments) witness the validity of the document's contents.
(Perhaps, as in the Old Testament covenant, heaven and earth are called to
witness; cf. Deut 30:19; Ps 50:4.)
6:2. The very image of an
archer on a white horse would strike terror into the heart of a pro-Roman
reader. The only mounted archers of antiquity were the Parthians, whose tactics
and skills had made them Rome's most feared enemies; old Persian armies, whose
heirs the Parthians were, always included sacred white horses. Although the Old
Testament uses the "bow" as a symbol of judgment by battle more generally,
Roman readers would think of this eastern nation that had defeated them in some
recent wars; Parthians' skill as archers was common knowledge. Other
contemporary apocalyptic writers (Similitudes of Enoch) also suggested a
dreaded Parthian invasion, hence ancient readers would have readily understood
that this horseman meant conquest and war.
6:3-4.
The "sword" was often a symbol of judgment by war in the Old Testament
and later literature, and red was the color most associated with war and
bloodshed (hence the "red planet" is named Mars for the Roman god of war). The
bloody unrest of A.D. 68-69, when three emperors were successively killed,
would have been one illustration of the principle here.
6:5-6.
The "scales" indicate rationing, or at least the caution of merchants to
get every cent the food is worth. Barley and wheat were basic staples. Because
a quart of wheat was a day's sustenance, and a denarius was a day's wage, a man
with a family would have to buy the cheaper barley instead. Even then, three
quarts of barley was hardly enough daily food for a whole family to subsist on;
in the many peasant families with large numbers of children, several children
would die. The famine also created a high inflation rate: this wheat costs more
than ten times the average price of wheat.
Oil
and wine were widely used, but not essential like wheat or barley. Oil was
especially used for anointing the head, washing the body and lighting lamps;
wine was mixed with water (one part wine for two to three parts water) for
meals. The selective continuance of such items of relatively secondary
importance while staples were barely obtainable would reinforce the reality of
divine judgment. Because inflation was high at the end of the first century and
some readers were no doubt aware of Domitian's unpopular restriction of land
for vineyards in the provinces, readers would have readily resonated with the
terror such prophecies implied. Asia Minor was hit especially hard by economic
troubles during Domitian's reign.
6:7-8.
This final specter may resemble the angel of death of Jewish tradition.
Lists of judgments such as this horseman brought are common in the Old
Testament prophets (e.g., Jer 14:12; 24:10; 27:8; Ezek 6:11; 7:15; 12:16) and,
less related in form, some judgment lists in the Sibylline Oracles; this list
is closest to Ezekiel 14:21.
6:9-11
The Fifth Seal
Comfortable people may not like the language of this passage, but
oppressed and suffering people who trust God can resonate with the promise of
vindication, as in the Old Testament and often throughout history.
6:9. The blood of
sacrifices was poured out at the base of the altar (Lev 4:7, 18, 25, 34; 5:9;
8:15; 9:9); the martyrs are thus viewed as sacrifices, like the Passover lamb
of Revelation 5:6. (Paschal lambs had come to be viewed as sacrificial in some
sense. Martyrs were also viewed as sacrifices in, e.g., 4 Maccabees and Phil
2:7.) Souls were "visible" to recipients of apocalypses, due to the seers'
visionary state.
6:10. The very fact of
their shed blood (6:9) cries out for the vindication of retribution (Gen 4:10;
see comment on Mt 23:35); as in the Old Testament, a prayer for vengeance for
corporate sin was ultimately a prayer for the vindication of the righteous and
of God's name. Justice could ultimately be done, and the oppressed delivered,
only when God arose to judge the earth. "How long?" was common in Old Testament
prayers of entreaty (e.g., Ps 6:3; 13:1; 80:4), including prayers for
vindication (e.g., Ps 79:5, 10; Zech 1:12); it also could address the duration
of a judgment (Is 6:11; Jer 47:6).
6:11. Other Jewish texts
also include prayers for vengeance and protests over delays (6:10); the souls
of the righteous in 4 Ezra (probably from the same decade as Revelation) ask
how long until the end and are told that they must wait until the full number
of righteous dead is completed. Jesus and Paul had also earlier stressed that
the good news must be preached to all nations‹with the attendant suffering for
witnesses involved in such proclamation‹before the end. On white robes see
comment on 4:4.
6:12-17
The Sixth Seal
Although cosmic, cataclysmic language is sometimes used for God's
judgments in history (e.g., an already-fulfilled judgment in Sibylline Oracles;
cosmic exaggerations of Sinai phenomena in Pseudo-Philo; cf. Ps 18; Jer
4:20-28), the language of this passage lends itself most naturally to the view
that it, like the sixth and seventh trumpets and vials, represents the end of the
age (as cosmic destruction generally does in the Old Testament prophets and
Jewish literature).
6:12-13. An
Old Testament prophecy associated the end of the age with a powerful earthquake
(Zech 14:4-5; cf. Ezek 38:20; Amos 8:8); because severe earthquakes had wrought
devastation in first-century Asia Minor, this announcement would have special
impact on the readers. Darkness was also an Old Testament judgment (Ex
10:21-23; Is 50:3), especially the judgment of the end (Is 13:9-10; 24:23; Ezek
32:7-8; Amos 5:18; 8:9; cf. 4 Ezra). The stars may symbolize angelic hosts
(12:4; Is 24:21; Dan 8:10; 10:13), but in this context they probably depict
simply the cosmic scope of the judgment (Is 34:4). The graphic language is not
meant as literal astronomy: disappearing or shaken stars were used as poetic
language for great devastations such as wars (Sibylline Oracles, Petronius; cf.
Is 13:10, 17).
6:14. A reader would
unroll a scroll with the right hand to read, rolling up again the part just
read with the left; the language here reflects Isaiah 34:4, which is also
echoed in other Jewish judgment oracles (Sibylline Oracles). This sort of
language was normally reserved for the end of the age.
6:15-16.
The Old Testament and apocalypses also speak of judgment across social
classes; the readers could be encouraged that God would ultimately vindicate
them against the emperor and his governors who now judged them. Hiding in the
rocks and crying for the mountains to conceal them from God's wrath reflects
Hosea 10:8; cf. Isaiah 2:10 and 19-20.
6:17. This verse reflects
especially Joel 2:11; cf. Malachi 3:2, referring to the day of judgment.
7:1-8
The Sealing of 144,000 Servants
One can take the 144,000 either consistently literally (literally
twelve thousand male Jewish virgins from each tribe- 14:4) or consistently
symbolically (the spiritual people of God, not literally 144,000). (Those who
take the number but not the ethnicity, gender and sexual history literally are
inconsistent.) Against taking it literally is Revelation's usage elsewhere of
"servants" (1:1; 6:11), suggesting that they constitute the whole of the saved
community (7:3-4). But whether they represent the innumerable multitude of 7:9
or the restored remnant of ethnic Israel remains debated.
"After
this I saw" (7:1) means that this vision follows the preceding one, not
necessarily that the events it describes do (see comment on 4:1); if 6:12-17
represents the end of the age, 7:1-8 must precede that event chronologically
(7:3), perhaps concurrent with the whole of 6:1-11.
7:1. Gentiles often
personified the elements of nature themselves or recognized gods attached to
them; Jewish people believed that God had delegated his authority over various
features of nature (including winds) to angels under his command (e.g., in
Jubilees; cf. Ps 148:1-12). "Four corners" of the earth was meant figuratively,
even in ancient times. A few people thought that the world was spherical, but
most people viewed it as circular; "four corners" was nevertheless conventional
speech, as was the idea of four winds from the four directions of heaven
(probably viewed as angels even in Zech 6:5). The winds had both positive and
negative effects in ancient sources. According to some views, the wind carried
along the sun and moon chariots (1 Enoch 72:5; 73:2), or God founded the
heavens on the winds (1 Enoch, Joseph and Asenath), and the stoppage of winds
could signal the advent of a new age (Sibylline Oracles, on the postdiluvian
era). Like writers today, the biblical writers used the language conventional
to the genre in which they were writing; this could include, as here, symbolic
imagery.
7:2. In the most popular
ancient conception, Helios drove his sun-chariot in a regular course above the
earth, rising from the gates of the east and descending into the west to return
by its path under the earth; the earth-circle was surrounded on all sides by
the river Oceanus. Jewish people naturally modified the sun god into an angel;
but any angel that would rise in the orbit of the sun would have been
recognized as superior to the greatest of the kings of the earth.
"Seal"
refers to the impress of a signet ring; an official who wished to delegate his
authority for a task to a representative would allow that subordinate to use
his signet ring.
7:3. Like documents or
merchandise sealed and stamped to guarantee their contents and prevent
tampering, God's servants were to be marked off as his (cf. Is 44:5). God had
previously protected his people in Goshen during the plagues (Ex 8:28; 9:4;
11:7; see comment on Rev 5:6); the idea of a protecting sign is also an Old
Testament image (Gen 4:15; Is 66:19). Here it is taken directly from Ezekiel
9:4-6, where judgment could not begin until the foreheads of the righteous
(those who mourned over the sin of their land) were marked. The forehead and
the hand (Ex 13:9, 16; 28:38; Deut 6:8; 11:18) were the most natural and
obvious parts of the body for this marking because they were most directly
exposed to view.
With
the possible exception of Genesis 4:15, all these Old Testament passages
probably meant the sign symbolically (despite more literal postexilic Jewish
practice of tefillin, phylacteries); Ezekiel 9:6 certainly did not
mean a humanly visible mark, and Revelation presumably means it in the same
sense as Ezekiel. In Hebrew, Ezekiel's mark was the Hebrew letter tav; in ancient
script it looked like, and rabbis compared it with, the Greek letter chi -similar to
English x -which some Christian commentators have compared (perhaps
wishfully) with the cross sign. Comparisons have also been made with branding
animals; with the occasional but well-documented tattooing of slaves and,
later, soldiers; with religious tattooing (e.g., in Mithraism); with spiritual
circumcision (circumcision was called a seal; and with the divine imprint on
humans (Philo), here applied specifically to those who live according to that
image. See comment on Revelation 13:16-18 and on Galatians 6:17; cf. 4 Ezra
6:5; 10:23; Psalms of Solomon 15:6-9; and Testament of Job 5:2.
7:4. Because this is the
full number of God's servants (7:3), the righteous (1:1; 2:20; 22:6), the
number and ethnic designation may be meant figuratively for true followers of
Israel's God (followers of Jesus; cf. 2:9; 3:9; 21:2, 14). Whether this number
is meant figuratively or literally, however, the allusion is clearly to the Old
Testament and universal Jewish conception of Israel's restoration, which is
pictured, as generally, in terms of the restoration of the remnant (survivors)
of the twelve tribes.
7:5-8.
The normal Jewish understanding was that the twelve tribes would inherit
the land together (Ezek 48). Yet by counting Joseph and Manasseh (the tribe of
Joseph was usually broken down into two tribes, represented by his sons
Manasseh and Ephraim) without omitting Levi, Revelation has to omit one of the
tribes, and omits Dan, the first in Ezekiel's list (48:1), in order to maintain
the number twelve. (Jewish commentators as early as the second century
associated Dan with idolatry, but no emphasis on that special association can
be documented this early. Dan's sins [ Judg 18:30; 1 Kings 12:29; Amos 8:14;
cf. Jubilees 44:28-29] are not the only ones mentioned in the Old Testament,
and the association with the serpent [ Gen 49:16-17 ] is too remote here.) This
omission may underline the symbolic nature of John's point in the whole
passage; one tribe may be omitted to indicate the danger of apostasy even among
the people of God (cf. Jn 6:70; 1 Jn). The sequence of tribes itself is
probably not significant‹it varied considerably in the Old Testament.
The
twelve tribes no longer existed as separate entities in the first century; with
few exceptions, only Judah, Benjamin and Levi were recognized as ancestors, and
today even most of those distinctions are no longer certain. The exact number,
twelve thousand from each tribe, is another indication of the symbolic nature
of the passage-twelve was the number of the people of God in Jewish texts
(e.g., Dead Sea Scrolls), and 144,000 is 12 x 12 x 10 x 10 x 10. Symbolic
numbers were standard fare in Jewish views of the future. (Some numerical
improbabilities worked their way into novels, too, e.g., the seven virgins who
waited on Asenath, all born the same night she was; but symbolic numbers were
standard in apocalyptic texts; see especially comment on the times of
Revelation 12.)
7:9-17
The Multitude of Overcomers Before the Throne
This section may represent a different group than the one pictured
in 7:1-8, or another picture of the same group now in heaven (double versions
of visions sometimes occur in the Old Testament, too; cf. Gen 41:25-27;
interpretations of visions also appear, e.g., in Daniel, 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch).
7:9-12.
White robes were appropriate for worship in the temple and were also
used for the worship of gods in Asia Minor. Palm branches were especially used
in the celebration of the Feast of Tabernacles. In the future, the remnant of
all nations would go up to Jerusalem to worship at the Feast of Tabernacles
(Zech 14:16); as in apocalyptic texts, the earthly future realm is in some
sense presently fulfilled in heaven. Palm branches celebrated the victory of
Israel's exodus from Egypt, and the feast commemorated God's faithfulness to
them during their wanderings in the wilderness, when they were totally
dependent on him.
Some
scholars have suggested that these multitudes are the martyrs or martyr church
of 6:11, viewed from another perspective. "Innumerable" meant that the crowd
was huge, too many to count‹not infinite (3 Maccabees 4:17; it could also
represent a number so great that it could be pictured as the sands of the sea
in number, as in Judith 2:20).
7:13-14.
Jewish teachers sometimes asked questions they knew their disciples
could not answer; the disciples then responded by asking for the answer. The
same teaching technique is employed here. Jewish apocalypses and their
occasional Roman analogues often included angelic guides (e.g., 1 Enoch and 3
Baruch) who asked the mortal observer rhetorical questions to guide him to a
truer understanding (e.g., 4 Ezra and Testament of Abraham; cf. Dan 8:13-14;
12:6-7); in other texts confused visionaries simply had to ask to begin with
(Dan 7:16; 12:8; 4 Ezra) or wait for an interpretation (Dan 8:16).
"The
great tribulation " refers to Daniel 12:1, the period of great suffering that
God's people were to experience before the end of the age. Making robes white
with blood is clearly a ritual rather than visual image: sacrificial blood
purified utensils for worship in the Old Testament (see comment on Heb
9:21-22), and white was the color of robes required for worship in the New
Testament period.
7:15-16.
God's tabernacle as a refuge over them directly echoes Isaiah 4:5-6,
which in turn alludes to a new exodus of salvation in the future time. When God
redeemed his people from Egypt and they wandered in the wilderness (the time
commemorated in the Feast of Tabernacles; see comment on Rev 7:9-12), he made
such a cloud over them as Isaiah describes. Revelation also borrows the
language of Isaiah 49:10 (again the salvation of the future age); cf. Psalm
121:5-6. On God's throne room in heaven being portrayed as a temple, see
comment on Revelation 4:6-7.
7:17. This verse alludes
to Isaiah 25:8 (in the context of the messianic banquet at the resurrection at
the end of the age) and 49:10 (in the age to come). For the imagery of the
shepherd (here graphically juxtaposed with the lamb), see the introduction to
John 10:1-18.
Revelation 6:1-17. THE OPENING OF THE FIRST SIX OF
THE SEVEN SEALS.
Compare
Note, see note on Revelation 5:1. Many (MEDE, FLEMING,
NEWTON, etc.). hold that all these seals have been fulfilled, the sixth having
been so by the overthrow of paganism and establishment of Christianity under
Constantine's edict, A.D. 312. There can, however, be no doubt that at least
the sixth seal is future, and is to be at the coming again of Christ. The great
objection to supposing the seals to be finally and exhaustively fulfilled
(though, probably, particular events may be partial fulfilments typical of the
final and fullest one), is that, if so, they ought to furnish (as the
destruction of Jerusalem, according to Christ's prophecy, does) a strong
external evidence of Revelation. But it is clear they cannot be used for this,
as hardly any two interpreters of this school are agreed on what events
constitute the fulfilment of each seal. Probably not isolated facts, but classes of events
preparing the way for Christ's coming kingdom, are intended by the opening of
the seals. The four living creatures severally cry at the opening of the first
four seals, "Come," which fact marks the division of the seven, as often
occurs in this sacred number, into four and three.
1. one of the seals ‹ The oldest manuscripts, A, B, C, Vulgate, and Syriac read, "one
of the seven seals." noise ‹ The three oldest manuscripts read
this in the nominative or dative, not the genitive, as English Version, "I heard
one from among the four living creatures saying, as (it were) the voice (or, Œas
with the voice Œ) of thunder." The first living creature was like a lion (Revelation
4:7): his voice is in consonance. Implying the lion-like boldness with which,
in the successive great revivals, the faithful have testified for Christ, and
especially a little before His coming shall testify. Or, rather, their
earnestness in praying for Christ's coming. Come and see ‹ One
oldest manuscript, B, has "And see." But A, C, and Vulgate reject it.
ALFORD rightly objects to English Version reading: "Whither was John
to come? Separated as he was by the glassy sea from the throne, was he to cross
it?" Contrast the form of expression, Revelation 10:8. It is much more likely
to be the cry of the redeemed to the Redeemer, "Come" and deliver the groaning
creature from the bondage of corruption. Thus, Revelation 6:2 is an answer to
the cry, went (literally, "came") forth corresponding to "Come." "Come," says
GROTIUS, is the living creature's address to John, calling his earnest
attention. But it seems hard to see how "Come" by itself can mean this. Compare
the only other places in Revelation where it is used, Revelation 4:1; 22:17. If
the four living creatures represent the four Gospels, the "Come" will be their
invitation to everyone (for it is not written that they addressed John ) to accept Christ's salvation
while there is time, as the opening of the seals marks a progressive step
towards the end (compare Revelation 22:17). Judgments are foretold as
accompanying the preaching of the Gospel as a witness to all nations (Revelation
14:6-11; Matthew 24:6-14). Thus the invitation, "Come," here, is aptly parallel
to Matthew 24:14. The opening of the first four seals is followed by judgments
preparatory for His coming. At the opening of the fifth seal, the martyrs above
express the same (Revelation 6:9, 10; compare Zechariah 1:10). At the opening
of the sixth seal, the Lord's coming is ushered in with terrors to the ungodly.
At the seventh, the consummation is fully attained (Revelation 11:15).
2. Evidently Christ, whether in person, or by His angel, preparatory
to His coming again, as appears from Revelation 19:11, 12. bow ‹ (Psalms
45:4, 5). crown ‹ Greek, "stephanos," the
garland or wreath of a conqueror, which is also implied by His white
horse, white being the emblem of victory. In Revelation 19:11, 12 the
last step in His victorious progress is represented; accordingly there He wears
many diadems (Greek, "diademata "; not merely Greek, "stephanoi," "crowns"
or "wreaths"), and is personally attended by the hosts of heaven. Compare
Zechariah 1:7-17; 6:1-8; especially Revelation 6:10 below, with Zechariah 1:12;
also compare the colors of the four horses. and to conquer ‹ that is,
so as to gain a lasting victory. All four seals usher in judgments on the
earth, as the power which opposes the reign of Himself and His Church. This,
rather than the work of conversion and conviction, is primarily meant, though
doubtless, secondarily, the elect will be gathered out through His word and His
judgments.
3. and see ‹ omitted in the three oldest manuscripts, A,
B, C, and Vulgate.
4. red ‹ the color of blood. The color
of the horse in each case answers to the mission of the rider. Compare Matthew
10:24-36, "Think not I am come to send peace on earth; I
came not to send peace, but a sword." The white horse of
Christ's bloodless victories is soon followed, through man's perversion of the
Gospel, by the red horse of bloodshed; but this is overruled to the clearing away of
the obstacles to Christ's coming kingdom. The patient ox is the
emblem of the second living creature who, at the opening of this seal,
saith, "Come." The saints amidst judgments on the earth in patience "endure to
the end." that they should kill ‹ The Greek is
indicative future, "that they may, as they also shall, kill one another."
5. Come and see ‹ The two oldest manuscripts, A, C,
and Vulgate omit "and see." B retains the words. black ‹ implying sadness and want. had ‹ Greek, "having." a
pair of balances ‹ the symbol of scarcity of provisions, the bread being doled out
by weight.
6. a voice ‹ Two oldest manuscripts, A, C, read, "as it
were a voice." B reads as English Version. The voice
is heard "in the midst of the four living creatures" (as Jehovah in the
Shekinah-cloud manifested His presence between the cherubim); because it is
only for the sake of, and in connection with, His redeemed, that God mitigates
His judgments on the earth. A measure ‹ "A chaenix." While
making food scarce, do not make it so much so that a chaenix (about a
day's provision of wheat, variously estimated at two or three pints) shall not
be obtainable "for a penny" (denarius, about twenty cents, probably
the day's wages of a laborer). Famine generally follows the sword.
Ordinarily, from sixteen to twenty measures were given for a denarius. The sword,
famine, noisome beasts, and the pestilence, are God's
four judgments on the earth. A spiritual famine, too, may be included in the
judgment. The "Come," in the case of this third seal, is said by the third of
the four living creatures, whose likeness is a man indicative
of sympathy and human compassion for the sufferers. God in it tempers judgment
with mercy. Compare Matthew 24:7, which indicates the very calamities foretold
in these seals, nation rising against nation (the
sword), famines, pestilences (Revelation 6:8), and earthquakes (Revelation
6:12). three measures of barley for a penny ‹ the
cheaper and less nutritious grain, bought by the laborer who could not buy
enough wheat for his family with his day's wages, a denarius, and, therefore,
buys barley. see thou hurt not the oil, and the wine ‹ the
luxuries of life, rather than necessaries; the oil and wine were to be spared
for the refreshment of the sufferers.
7. and see ‹ supported by B; omitted by A, C, and Vulgate. The fourth
living creature, who was "like a flying eagle," introduces this seal; implying
high-soaring intelligence, and judgment descending from on high fatally on the
ungodly, as the king of birds on his prey.
8. pale ‹ "livid" [ALFORD]. Death ‹
personified. Hell ‹ Hades personified. unto them ‹ Death and Hades. So A, C
read. But B and Vulgate read, "to him." fourth part of the earth ‹ answering
to the first four seals; his portion as one of the four, being a fourth part. death ‹
pestilence; compare Ezekiel 14:21 with the four judgments here, the sword,
famine, pestilence, and wild beasts; the famine the
consequence of the sword; pestilence, that of famine; and beasts multiplying
by the consequent depopulation. with the beasts ‹ Greek, "by"; more
direct agency. These four seals are marked off from the three last, by the four
living creatures introducing them with "Come." The calamities indicated are not
restricted to one time, but extend through the whole period of Church history
to the coming of Christ, before which last great and terrible day of the Lord
they shall reach highest aggravation. The first seal is the summary, Christ
going forth conquering till all enemies are subdued under Him, with a
view to which the judgments subsequently specified accompany the preaching
of the Gospel for a witness to all nations.
9. The three last seals relate to the invisible, as the first four
to the visible world; the fifth, to the martyrs who have died as believers; the
sixth, to those who have died, or who shall be found at Christ's coming,
unbelievers, namely, "the kings . . . great men . . . bondman . . . freeman";
the seventh, to the silence in heaven. The scene changes from earth to heaven;
so that interpretations which make these three last consecutive to the first
four seals, are very doubtful. I saw ‹ in spirit. For souls are not
naturally visible. under the altar ‹ As the blood of sacrificial
victims slain on the altar was poured at the bottom of the altar, so the
souls of those sacrificed for Christ's testimony are symbolically represented
as under the altar, in heaven; for the life or animal soul is in the blood, and blood
is often represented as crying for vengeance (Genesis 4:10). The altar in
heaven, antitypical to the altar of sacrifice, is Christ crucified. As it is
the altar that sanctifies the gift, so it is Christ alone who makes our
obedience, and even our sacrifice of life for the truth, acceptable to God. The
sacrificial altar was not in the sanctuary, but outside; so Christ's literal
sacrifice and the figurative sacrifice of the martyrs took place, not in the heavenly
sanctuary, but outside, here on earth. The only altar in heaven is that
antitypical to the temple altar of incense. The blood of the martyrs cries from
the earth under Christ's cross, whereon they may be considered virtually to
have been sacrificed; their souls cry from under the altar of incense, which is
Christ in heaven, by whom alone the incense of praise is accepted before God.
They are under Christ, in His immediate presence, shut up unto Him in joyful
eager expectancy until He shall come to raise the sleeping dead. Compare the
language of 2 Maccabees 7:36 as indicating Jewish opinion on the subject. Our
brethren who have now suffered a short pain are dead under (Greek ) God's
covenant of everlasting life. testimony which they held ‹ that is, which
they bore, as committed to them to bear. Compare Revelation 12:17, "Have (same Greek as here)
the testimony of Jesus."
10. How long ‹ Greek, "Until
when?" As in the parable the woman (symbol of the Church) cries day and
night to the unjust judge for justice against her adversary who is
always oppressing her (compare below, Revelation 12:10); so the elect (not only
on earth, but under Christ's covering, and in His presence in
Paradise) cry day and night to God, who will assuredly, in His
own time, avenge His and their cause, "though He bear long with them."
These passages need not be restricted to some particular martyrdoms, but
have been, and are receiving, and shall receive partial fulfilments, until
their last exhaustive fulfilment before Christ's coming. So as to the other
events foretold here. The glory even of those in Paradise will only be complete
when Christ's and the Church's foes are cast out, and the earth will become
Christ's kingdom at His coming to raise the sleeping saints. Lord ‹ Greek, "Master";
implying that He has them and their foes and all His creatures as absolutely at
His disposal, as a master has his slaves; hence, in Revelation 6:11, "fellow
servants," or fellow slaves follows. holy ‹ Greek, "the Holy
one." avenge ‹ "exact vengeance for our blood." on ‹ Greek, "from them." that
dwell on the earth ‹ the ungodly, of earth, earthly, as distinguished from the
Church, whose home and heart are even now in heavenly places.
11. white robes ‹ The three oldest manuscripts, A,
B, C, read, "A white robe was given." every one of ‹ One
oldest manuscript, B, omits this. A and C read, "unto them, unto each," that
is, unto them severally. Though their joint cry for the riddance of the earth
from the ungodly is not yet granted, it is intimated that it will be so in due
time; meanwhile, individually they receive the white robe,
indicative of light, joy, and triumphant victory over their foes; even as the
Captain of their salvation goes forth on a white horse conquering
and to conquer; also of purity and sanctity through Christ. MAIMONIDES says that
the Jews used to array priests, when approved of, in white robes; thus the
sense is, they are admitted among the blessed ones, who, as spotless priests,
minister unto God and the Lamb. should ‹ So C reads. But A and B, "shall rest." a
little season ‹ One oldest manuscript, B, omits "little." A and C support it.
Even if it be omitted, is it to be inferred that the "season" is short as
compared with eternity? BENGEL fancifully made a season (Greek, "chronus," the word
here used) to be one thousand one hundred and eleven one-ninth years, and a time (Revelation
12:12, 14, Greek, "kairos ") to be a fifth of a season, that is,
two hundred and twenty-two two-ninths years. The only distinction in the Greek is, a season (Greek, "chronus ") is a
sort of aggregate of times. Greek, "kairos," a specific
time, and so of short duration. As to their rest, compare
Revelation 14:13 (the same Greek, "anapauomai "); Isaiah
57:2; Daniel 12:13. until their . . . brethren . . . be fulfilled ‹ in
number. Until their full number shall have been completed. The number of the
elect is definitely fixed: perhaps to fill up that of the fallen angels. But
this is mere conjecture. The full blessedness and glory of all the
saints shall be simultaneous. The earlier shall not anticipate the later
saints. A and C read, "shall have been accomplished"; B and a read,
"shall have accomplished (their course)."
12. As Revelation 6:4, 6-8, the sword, famine, and pestilence,
answer to Matthew 24:6, 7; Revelation 6:9, 10, as to martyrdoms, answer to
Matthew 24:9, 10; so this passage, Revelation 6:12, 17, answers to Matthew
24:29, 30, "the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,
and the stars shall fall from heaven; . . . then shall all the tribes of the
earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming"; imagery describing the
portents of the immediate coming of the day of the Lord; but not the
coming itself until the elect are sealed, and the judgments invoked by the
martyrs descend on the earth, the sea, and the trees (Revelation 7:1-3). and,
lo ‹ So A reads. But B and C omit "lo." earthquake ‹ Greek, "shaking"
of the heavens, the sea, and the dry land; the shaking of these mutable things
being the necessary preliminary to the setting up of those things which
cannot be shaken. This is one of the catchwords
[WORDSWORTH] connecting the sixth seal with the sixth trumpet (Revelation
11:13) and the seventh vial (Revelation 16:17-21); also the seventh seal
(Revelation 8:5). sackcloth ‹ One kind, made of the "hair" of
Cilician goats, was called "cilicium," or Cilician cloth, and was used for
tents, etc. Paul, a Cilician, made such tents (Acts 18:3). moon ‹ A, B, C,
and oldest versions read, "the whole moon"; the full moon; not merely the crescent
moon. as blood ‹ (Joel 2:31).
13. stars . . . fell . . . as a fig tree casteth her . . . figs ‹ (Isaiah
34:4; Nahum 3:12). The Church shall be then ripe for glorification, the
Antichristian world for destruction, which shall be accompanied with mighty
phenomena in nature. As to the stars falling to the earth, Scripture describes
natural phenomena as they would appear to the spectator, not in the language of
scientific accuracy; and yet, while thus adapting itself to ordinary men, it
drops hints which show that it anticipates the discoveries of modern science.
14. departed ‹ Greek, "was
separated from" its place; "was made to depart." Not as ALFORD, "parted asunder "; for, on
the contrary, it was rolled together as a scroll which had been open is
rolled up and laid aside. There is no "asunder one from another" here in the Greek, as in Acts
15:39, which ALFORD copies. mountain . . . moved out of . . . places ‹ (Psalms
121:1, Margin; Jeremiah 3:23; 4:24; Nahum 1:5). This total disruption shall be
the precursor of the new earth, just as the pre-Adamic convulsions prepared it
for its present occupants.
15. kings . . . hid themselves ‹ Where was
now the spirit of those whom the world has so greatly feared? [BENGEL]. great
men ‹ statesmen and high civil officers. rich men . . . chief
captains ‹ The three oldest manuscripts, A, B, C, transpose thus, "chief
captains . . . rich men." mighty ‹ The three oldest manuscripts, A,
B, and C read, "strong" physically (Psalms 33:16). in ‹ literally
"into"; ran into, so as to hide themselves in. dens ‹ "caves."
16. from the face ‹ (Psalms 34:16). On the whole
verse, compare Hosea 10:8; Luke 23:30.
17. Literally, "the day, the great (day)," which can only mean the
last great day. After the Lord has exhausted all His ordinary judgments, the
sword, famine, pestilence, and wild beasts, and still sinners are impenitent,
the great day of the Lord itself' shall come. Matthew 24:6-29 plainly forms a
perfect parallelism to the six seals, not only in the events, but also in the order
of their occurrence: Matthew 24:3, the first seal; Matthew 24:6, the second
seal; Matthew 24:7, the third seal; Matthew 24:7, end, the fourth seal; Matthew
24:9, the fifth seal, the persecutions and abounding iniquity under which, as
well as consequent judgments accompanied with gospel preaching to all nations
as a witness, are particularly detailed, Matthew 24:9-28; Matthew 24:29, the
sixth seal. to stand ‹ to stand justified, and not condemned before
the Judge. Thus the sixth seal brings us to the verge of the Lord's coming. The
ungodly "tribes of the earth" tremble at the signs of His immediate approach.
But before He actually inflicts the blow in person, "the elect" must be
"gathered "out.
CHAPTER 7
Revelation 7:1-17. SEALING OF THE ELECT OF ISRAEL.
THE COUNTLESS MULTITUDE OF THE GENTILE ELECT.
1. And ‹ so B and Syriac. But A, C, Vulgate, and Coptic omit "and."
after these things ‹ A, B, C, and Coptic read, "after this." The two visions
in this chapter come in as an episode after the sixth
seal, and before the seventh seal. It is clear that, though "Israel" may
elsewhere designate the spiritual Israel, "the elect (Church) on earth"
[ALFORD], here, where the names of the tribes one by one are specified, these
names cannot have any but the literal meaning. The second advent will be the
time of the restoration of the kingdom to Israel, when the
times of the Gentiles shall have been fulfilled, and the
Jews shall at last say, "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord."
The period of the Lord's absence has been a blank in the history of the Jews as
a nation. As then Revelation is the Book of the Second Advent [DE BURGH],
naturally mention of God's restored favor to Israel occurs among the events
that usher in Christ's advent. earth . . . sea . . . tree ‹ The
judgments to descend on these are in answer to the martyrs' prayer under the fifth seal.
Compare the same judgments under the fifth trumpet, the sealed being
exempt (Revelation 9:4). on any tree ‹ Greek, "against any tree" (Greek, "epi ti
dendron ": but "on the earth," Greek, "epi
tees gees ").
2. from the east ‹ Greek, "the rising
of the sun." The quarter from which God's glory oftenest manifests itself.
3. Hurt not ‹ by letting loose the destructive winds. till
we have sealed the servants of our God ‹ parallel to Matthew 24:31, "His
angels . . . shall gather together His elect from the four winds." God's love
is such, that He cannot do anything in the way of judgment, till His
people are secured from hurt (Genesis 19:22). Israel, at the eve of the Lord's
coming, shall be found re-embodied as a nation; for its tribes are distinctly
specified (Joseph, however, being substituted for Dan; whether because
Antichrist is to come from Dan, or because Dan is to be Antichrist's especial
tool [ARETAS, tenth century], compare Genesis 49:17; Jeremiah 8:16; Amos 8:14;
just as there was a Judas among the Twelve). Out of these tribes a believing
remnant will be preserved from the judgments which shall destroy all the
Antichristian confederacy (Revelation 6:12-17), and shall be transfigured
with the elect Church of all nations, namely, 144,000 (or whatever number
is meant by this symbolical number), who shall faithfully resist the seductions
of Antichrist, while the rest of the nation, restored to Palestine in unbelief,
are his dupes, and at last his victims. Previously to the Lord's judgments on
Antichrist and his hosts, these latter shall destroy two-thirds of the
nation, one-third escaping, and, by the Spirit's operation through affliction,
turning to the Lord, which remnant shall form the nucleus on earth of the
Israelite nation that is from this time to stand at the head of the millennial
nations of the world. Israel's spiritual resurrection shall be "as life from
the dead" to all the nations. As now a regeneration goes on here and there of
individuals, so there shall then be a regeneration of nations universally, and
this in connection with Christ's coming. Matthew 24:34; "this generation (the
Jewish nation) shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled," which
implies that Israel can no more pass away before Christ's advent, than
Christ's own words can pass away (the same Greek ), Matthew
24:35. So exactly Zechariah 13:8, 9; 14:2-4, 9-21; compare Zechariah 12:2-14;
13:1, 2. So also Ezekiel 8:17, 18; 9:1-7, especially Ezekiel 9:4. Compare also
Ezekiel 10:2 with Revelation 8:5, where the final judgments actually fall on
the earth, with the same accompaniment, the fire of the altar cast into the
earth, including the fire scattered over the city. So again,
Revelation 14:1, the same 144,000 appear on Zion with the Father's name in
their forehead, at the close of the section, the twelfth through fourteenth
chapters, concerning the Church and her foes. Not that the saints are exempt
from trial: Revelation 7:14 proves the contrary; but their trials are distinct
from the destroying judgments that fall on the world; from these
they are exempted, as Israel was from the plagues of Egypt, especially from the
last, the Israelite doors having the protecting seal of the blood-mark. foreheads ‹ the most
conspicuous and noblest part of man's body; on which the helmet, "the hope of
salvation," is worn.
4. Twelve is the number of the tribes, and appropriate to
the Church: three by four: three, the divine number,
multiplied by four, the number for world-wide extension. Twelve by
twelve implies fixity and completeness, which is taken a
thousandfold in 144,000. A thousand implies the world perfectly
pervaded by the divine; for it is ten, the world
number, raised to the power of three, the number of God. of all the
tribes ‹ literally, "out of every tribe"; not 144,000 of each tribe, but
the aggregate of the twelve thousand from every tribe. children ‹ Greek, "sons of Israel."
Revelation 3:12; 21:12, are no objection, as ALFORD thinks, to the literal
Israel being meant; for, in consummated glory, still the Church will be that
"built on the foundation of the (Twelve ) apostles (Israelites),
Jesus Christ (an Israelite) being the chief corner-stone." Gentile believers
shall have the name of Jerusalem written on them, in that
they shall share the citizenship antitypical to that of the literal Jerusalem.
5-8. Judah (meaning praise ) stands first, as Jesus' tribe.
Benjamin, the youngest, is last; and with him is associated second last, Joseph.
Reuben, as originally first-born, comes next after Judah, to whom it gave
place, having by sin lost its primogeniture right. Besides the reason given
above (see note on Revelation 7:2), another akin for the omission of
Dan, is, its having been the first to lapse into idolatry (Judges 18:1-31); for
which same reason the name Ephraim, also (compare Judges 17:1-3; Hosea 4:17),
is omitted, and Joseph substituted. Also, it had been now for long almost
extinct. Long before, the Hebrews say [GROTIUS], it was reduced to the one
family of Hussim, which perished subsequently in the wars before Ezra's time.
Hence it is omitted in the fourth through eighth chapters of First Chronicles.
Dan's small numbers are joined here to Naphtali's, whose brother he was by the
same mother [BENGEL]. The twelve times twelve thousand sealed ones of Israel
are the nucleus of transfigured humanity [AUBERLEN], to which the elect
Gentiles are joined, "a multitude which no man could number," Revelation 7:9
(that is, the Church of Jews and Gentiles indiscriminately, in which the
Gentiles are the predominant element, Luke 21:24. The word "tribes," Greek, implies
that believing Israelites are in this countless multitude ). Both are
in heaven, yet ruling over the earth, as ministers of blessing to its
inhabitants: while upon earth the world of nations is added to the kingdom of
Israel. The twelve apostles stand at the head of the whole. The upper and the
lower congregation, though distinct, are intimately associated.
9. no man ‹ Greek, "no one." of all nations ‹ Greek, "OUT OF every
nation." The human race is "one nation" by origin,
but afterwards separated itself into tribes, peoples, and tongues; hence, the
one singular stands first, followed by the three plurals. kindreds ‹ Greek, "tribes." people ‹ Greek, "peoples."
The "first-fruits unto the Lamb," the 144,000 (Revelation 14:1-4) of Israel,
are followed by a copious harvest of all nations, an election out of the
Gentiles, as the 144,000 are an election out of Israel (see note on
Revelation 7:3). white robes ‹ (See note on Revelation 6:11; also
Revelation 3:5, 18; 4:4). palms in . . . hands ‹ the
antitype to Christ's entry into Jerusalem amidst the palm-bearing multitude.
This shall be just when He is about to come visibly and take possession of His
kingdom. The palm branch is the symbol of joy and triumph. It was used
at the feast of tabernacles, on the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when
they kept feast to God in thanksgiving for the ingathered fruits. The antitype
shall be the completed gathering in of the harvest of the elect redeemed here
described. Compare Zechariah 14:16, whence it appears that the earthly feast of
tabernacles will be renewed, in commemoration of Israel's preservation in her
long wilderness-like sojourn among the nations from which she shall now be
delivered, just as the original typical feast was to commemorate her dwelling
for forty years in booths or tabernacles in the literal wilderness.
10. cried ‹ Greek, "cry," in the three oldest
manuscripts, A, B, C, Vulgate, Syriac, and Coptic. It is
their continuing, ceaseless employment. Salvation ‹
literally, "THE salvation"; all the praise of our salvation be ascribed to our
God. At the Lord's entry into Jerusalem, the type, similarly "salvation" is the
cry of the palm-bearing multitudes. Hosanna means "save
us now"; taken from Psalms 118:25, in which Psalm (Psalms 118:14, 15, 21, 26)
the same connection occurs between salvation, the tabernacles of the
righteous, and the Jews' cry to be repeated by the whole nation at Christ's
coming, "Blessed be He that cometh in the name of the Lord."
11. The angels, as in Revelation 5:11, in their turn take up the
anthem of praise. There it was "many angels," here it is "all the
angels." stood ‹ "were standing" [ALFORD].
12. Greek, "The blessing, the glory, the wisdom, the
thanksgiving, the honor, the power, the might [the doxology is sevenfold, implying
its totality and completeness], unto the ages of the ages."
13. answered ‹ namely, to my thoughts; spoke,
asking the question which might have been expected to arise in John's mind from
what has gone before. One of the twenty-four elders, representing the Old and
New Testament ministry, appropriately acts as interpreter of this vision of the
glorified Church. What, etc. ‹ Greek order, "These
which are arrayed in white robes, WHO are they?"
14. Sir ‹ Greek, "Lord." B, C, Vulgate,
Syriac, Coptic versions, and CYPRIAN read, "My Lord." A omits "My," as English
Version. thou knowest ‹ taken from Ezekiel 37:3.
Comparatively ignorant ourselves of divine things, it is well for us to look
upward for divinely communicated knowledge. came ‹ rather as
Greek, "come"; implying that they are just come. great
tribulation ‹ Greek, "THE great tribulation"; "the tribulation, the
great one," namely, the tribulation to which the martyrs were exposed
under the fifth seal, the same which Christ foretells as about to precede His
coming (Matthew 24:21, great tribulation ), and followed by the same
signs as the sixth seal (Matthew 24:29, 30), compare Daniel 12:1; including
also retrospectively all the tribulation which the saints of all ages
have had to pass through. Thus this seventh chapter is a recapitulation of the
vision of the six seals, Revelation 6:1-17, to fill up the outline there given
in that part of it which affects the faithful of that day. There, however,
their number was waiting to be completed, but here it is completed, and they
are seen taken out of the earth before the judgments on the Antichristian
apostasy; with their Lord, they, and all His faithful witnesses and disciples
of past ages, wait for His coming and their coming to be glorified and reign
together with Him. Meanwhile, in contrast with their previous sufferings, they
are exempt from the hunger, thirst, and scorching heats of their life on earth
(Revelation 7:16), and are fed and refreshed by the Lamb of God Himself
(Revelation 7:17; 14:1-4, 13); an earnest of their future perfect blessedness
in both body and soul united (Revelation 21:4-6; 22:1-5). washed . . . robes
. . . white in the blood of . . . Lamb ‹ (Revelation 1:5; Isaiah 1:18;
Hebrews 9:14; 1 John 1:7; compare Isaiah 61:10; Zechariah 3:3-5). Faith applies
to the heart the purifying blood; once for all for justification, continually
throughout the life for sanctification.
15. Therefore ‹ because they are so washed white;
for without it they could never have entered God's holy heaven; Revelation
22:14, "Blessed are those who wash their robes (the oldest
manuscripts reading), that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter
in through the gates into the city"; Revelation 21:27; Ephesians 5:26, 27. before ‹ Greek, "in the
presence of." Matthew 5:8; 1 Corinthians 13:12, "face to face." throne . . .
temple ‹ These are connected because we can approach the heavenly King
only through priestly mediation; therefore, Christ is at once King and Priest
on His throne. day and night ‹ that is, perpetually; as those
approved of as priests by the Sanhedrin were clothed in white, and kept by
turns a perpetual watch in the temple at Jerusalem; compare as to the singers,
1 Chronicles 9:33, "day and night"; Psalms 134:1. Strictly "there is no night"
in the heavenly sanctuary (Revelation 22:5). in his temple ‹ in what
is the heavenly analogue to His temple on earth, for strictly there is "no temple
therein" (Revelation 21:22), "God and the Lamb are the temple" filling the
whole, so that there is no distinction of sacred and secular places; the city
is the temple, and the temple the city. Compare Revelation 4:8, "the four
living creatures rest not day and night, saying, Holy," etc. shall
dwell among them ‹ rather (Greek, "scenosei ep' autous "), "shall
be the tabernacle over them" (compare Revelation 21:3; Leviticus 26:11,
especially Isaiah 4:5, 6; 8:14; 25:4; Ezekiel 37:27). His dwelling among them is to be
understood as a secondary truth, besides what is expressed, namely, His being
their covert. When once He tabernacled among us as the Word made flesh, He was in
great lowliness; then He shall be in great glory.
16. (Isaiah 49:10). hunger no more ‹ as they
did here. thirst any more ‹ (John 4:13). the sun ‹
literally, scorching in the East. Also, symbolically, the sun of persecution. neither
. . . light ‹ Greek, "by no means at all . . . light" (fall). heat ‹ as the
sirocco.
17. in the midst of the throne ‹ that is,
in the middle point in front of the throne (Revelation 5:6). feed ‹ Greek, "tend as a
shepherd." living fountains of water ‹ A, B, Vulgate, and CYPRIAN
read, (eternal) "life's fountains of waters." "Living" is not supported
by the old authorities.
Chapter 6
Analysis of the Chapter
THIS chapter contains an account of the opening of six of the
seven seals. It need hardly be said to any one who is at all familiar with the
numerous‹not to say numberless‹expositions of the Apocalypse, that it is at
this point that interpreters begin to differ, and that here commences the
divergence towards those various, discordant, and many of them wild and
fantastic theories, which have been proposed in the exposition of this
wonderful book. Up to this point, though there may be unimportant diversities
in the exposition of words and phrases, there is no material difference of
opinion as to the general meaning of the writer. In the epistles to the seven
churches, and in the introductory scenes to the main visions, there can be no
doubt, in the main, as to what the writer had in view, and what he meant to
describe. He addressed churches then existing, (chaps. i.‹iii.,) and set before
them their sins and their duties; and he described scenes passing before his
eyes as then present, (chaps. iv., v.,) which were merely designed to impress
his own mind with the importance of what was to be disclosed, and to bring the
great actors on the stage, and in reference to which there could be little
ground for diversity in the interpretation. Here, however, the scene opens into
the future, comprehending all the unknown period until there shah be a final
triumph of Christianity, and all its foes shall be prostrate. The actors are
the Son of God, angels, men, Satan, storms, tempests, earthquakes, the
pestilence and fire; the scene is heaven, earth, hell. There is no certain
designation of places; there is no mention of names‹as there is in Isaiah (Isa.
45:1) of Cyrus, or as there is in Daniel (Dan. 8:21; 10:20; 11:2) of the "king
of Grecia ;" there is no designation of time that is necessarily unambiguous;
and there are no characteristics of the symbols used that make it antecedently
certain that they could be applied only to one class of events. In the
boundless future that was to succeed the times of John there would be, of
necessity, many events to which these symbols might be applied, and the result
has shown that it has required but a moderate share of pious ingenuity to apply
them, by different expositors, to events differing widely from each other in
their character, and in the times when they would occur. It would be too long
to glance even at the various theories which have been proposed and maintained
in regard to the interpretation of the subsequent portions of the Apocalypse,
and wholly impossible to attempt to examine those theories. Time, in its
developments, has already exploded many of them; and time, in its future
developments, will doubtless explode many more, and each one must stand or fall
as in the disclosures of the future it shall be found to be true or false. It
would be folly to add another to those numerous theories, even if I had any
such theory, (see the Preface,) and perhaps equal folly to pronounce with
certainty on any one of those which have been advanced. Yet this seems to be an
appropriate place to state, in few words, what principles it is designed to
pursue in the interpretation of the remainder of the book.
(1.)
It may be assumed that large portions of the book relate to the future; that
is, to that which was future when John wrote. In this all expositors are
agreed, and this is manifest indeed on the very face of the representation. It
would be impossible to attempt an interpretation on any other supposition, and
somewhere in that vast future the events are to be found to which the symbols
here used had reference. This is assumed, indeed, on the supposition that the
book is inspired: a fact which is assumed all along in this exposition, and
which should be allowed to control our interpretation. But assuming that the
book relates to the future, though that supposition will do something to
determine the true method of interpretation, yet it leaves many questions still
unsolved. Whether it refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, on the supposition
that the work was written before that event, or to the history of the church
subsequent to that; whether it is designed to describe events minutely, or only
in the most general manner; whether it is intended to furnish a syllables of
civil and ecclesiastical history, or only a very general outline of future
events; whether the times are so designated that we can fix them with entire
certainty; or whether it was intended to furnish any certain indication of the
periods of the world when these things should occur;‹all these are still open
questions, and it need not be said that on these the opinions of expositors
have been greatly divided.
(2.)
It may be assumed that there is meaning in these symbols, and that they were
not used without an intention to convey some important ideas to the mind of
John and to the minds of his readers‹to the church then, and to the church in
future times. Comp. Note on Rev. 1:3.
The
book is indeed surpassingly sublime. It abounds with the highest flights of
poetic language. It is Oriental in its character, and exhibits everywhere the
proofs of a most glowing imagination in the writer. But it is also to be borne
in mind that it is an inspired book, and this fact is to determine the
character of the exposition. If inspired, it is to be assumed that there is a
meaning in these symbols; an idea in each one of them, and in all combined, of
importance to the church and the world. Whether we can ascertain the meaning is
another question; but it is never to be doubted by an expositor of the Bible
that there is a meaning in the words and images employed, and that to find out
that meaning is worthy of earnest study and prayer.
(3.)
Predictions respecting the future are often necessarily obscure to man. It
cannot be doubted, indeed, that God could have foretold future events in the
most clear and unambiguous language, he who knows all that is to come as
intimately as he does all the past, could have caused a record to have been
made, disclosing names, and dates, and places, so that the most minute
statements of what is to occur might have been in the possession of man as
clearly as the records of the past now are. But there were obvious reasons why
this should not occur, and in the prophecies it is rare that there is any such
specification. To have done this might have been to defeat the very end in
view; for it would have given to man, a free agent, the power of embarrassing
or frustrating the Divine plans. But if this course is not adopted, then
prophecy must, from the nature of the case, be obscure. The knowledge of any
one particular fact in the future is so connected with many other facts, and
often implies so much knowledge of other things, that without that other knowledge
it could not be understood. Suppose that it had been predicted, in the time of
John, that at some future period some contrivance should be found out by which
what was doing in one part of the world could be instantaneously known in
another remote part of the world, and spread abroad by thousands of copies in
an hour to be read by a nation. Suppose, for instance, that there had been some
symbol, or emblem representing what actually occurs now, when in a morning
newspaper we read what occurred last evening at St. Louis, Dubuque, Galena,
Chicago, Cincinnati, Charleston, New Orleans. It is clear that at a time when
the magnetic telegraph and the printing-press were unknown, any symbol or
language describing it that could be employed must be obscure, and the
impression must have been that this could be accomplished only by miracle‹and
it would not be difficult for one who was disposed to scepticism to make out an
argument to prove that this could not occur. It would be impossible to explain
any symbol that could be employed to represent this until these wonderful
descriptions should become reality, and in the mean time the book in which the
symbols were found might be regarded as made up of mere riddles and enigmas;
but when these inventions should be actually found out, however much ridicule
or contempt had been poured on the book before, it might be perfectly evident
that the symbol was the most appropriate that could be used, and no one could
doubt that it was a Divine communication of what was to be in the future.
Something of the same kind may have occurred in the symbols used by the writer
of the book before us.
(4.)
It is not necessary to suppose that a prophecy will be understood in all its
details until the prediction is accomplished. In the case just referred to,
though the fact of the rapid spread of intelligence might be clear, yet nothing
would convey any idea of the mode or of the actual meaning of the symbols used,
unless the inventions were themselves anticipated by a direct revelation. The trial
of faith in the ease would be the belief that the fact would occur, but would
not relate the mode in which it was to be accomplished, or the language
employed to describe it. There might be great obscurity in regard to the
symbols and language, and yet the knowledge of the fact be perfectly plain.
When, however, the fact should occur as predicted, all would be clear. So it is
in respect to prophecy. Many recorded predictions that are now clear as
noon-day, were once as ambiguous and uncertain in respect to their meaning as
in the supposed case of the press and the telegraph. Time has made them plain;
for the event to which they referred has so entirely corresponded with the
symbol as to leave no doubt in regard to the meaning. Thus many of the prophecies
relating to the Messiah were obscure at the time when they were uttered; were
apparently so contradictory that they could not be reconciled; were so unlike
anything that then existed, that the fulfilment seemed to be impossible; and
were so enigmatical in the symbols employed, that it seemed in vain to attempt
to disclose their meaning. The advent of the long-promised Messiah, however,
removed the obscurity, and now they are read with no uncertainty as to their
meaning, and with no doubt that those predictions, once so obscure, had a
Divine origin.
The
view just suggested may lead us to some just conceptions of what is necessary
to be done in attempting to explain the prophecies. Suppose then, first, that
there had been, say in the dark ages, some predictions that claimed to be of
Divine origin, of the invention of the art of printing and of the magnetic
telegraph. The proper business of an interpreter, if he regarded this as a
Divine communication, would have consisted in four things:
(a)
to explain, as well as he could, the fair meaning of the symbols employed, and
the language used;
(b)
to admit the fact referred to, and implied in the fair interpretation of the
language employed, of the rapid spread of intelligence in that future period,
though he could not explain how it was to be done;
(c)
in the meantime it would be a perfectly legitimate object for him to inquire
whether there were any events occurring in the world, or whether there had been
any, to which these symbols were applicable, or which would meet all the
circumstances involved in them;
(d)
if there were, then his duty would be ended; if there were not, then the
symbols, with such explanation as could be furnished of their meaning, should
be handed on to future times to be applied when the predicted events should
actually occur. Suppose then, secondly, the case of the predictions respecting
the Messiah, scattered along through many books, and given in various forms,
and by various symbols. The proper business of an interpreter would have been,
as in the other case,
(a)
to explain the fair meaning, of the language used, and to bring together all
the circumstances m one connected whole, that a distinct conception of the
predicted Messiah might be before the mind;
(b)
to admit the facts referred to, and thus predicted, however incomprehensible
and apparently contradictory they might appear to be;
(c)
to inquire whether any one had appeared who combined within himself all the
characteristics of the description; and
(d)
if no one had thus appeared, to send on the prophecies, with such explanations
of words and symbols as could be ascertained to be correct, to future times, to
have their full meaning developed when the object of all the predictions should
be accomplished, and the Messiah should appear. Then the meaning of all would
be plain; and then the argument from prophecy would be complete. This is
obviously now the proper state of the mind in regard to the predictions in the
Bible, and these are the principles which should be applied in examining the
book of Revelation.
(5.)
It may be assumed that new light will be thrown upon the prophecies by
time, and by the progress of events. It cannot be supposed that the
investigations of the meaning of the prophetic symbols will all be in vain.
Difficulties, it is reasonable to hope, may be cleared up; errors may be
detected in regard to the application of the prophecies to particular events;
and juster views on the prophecies, as on all other subjects, will prevail as
the world grows older. We become wiser by seeing the errors of those who have
gone before us, and an examination of the causes which led them astray may
enable us to avoid such errors in the future. :Especially may it be supposed
that light will be thrown on the prophecies as they shall be in part or wholly
fulfilled. The prophecies respecting the destruction of Babylon, of Petra, of
Tyre, of Jerusalem, are now fully understood; the prophecies respecting the
advent of the Messiah, and his character and work, once so obscure, are now perfectly
clear. So, we have reason to suppose, it will be with all prophecy in the
progress of events, and sooner or later the world will settle down into some
uniform belief in regard to the design and meaning of these portions of the
sacred writings. Whether the time has yet come for this, or whether numerous
other failures are to be added to the melancholy catalogue of past failures on
this subject, is another question; but ultimately all the now unfulfilled
prophecies will be as clear as to their meaning as are those which have been
already fulfilled.
(6.)
The plan, therefore, which I propose in the examination of the remaining
portion of the Apocalypse is the following:
(a)
To explain the meaning of the symbols; that is, to show, as clearly as
possible, what those symbols properly express, independently of any attempt to
apply them. This opens, of itself, an interesting field of investigation, and
one where essential service may be done, even if nothing further is intended.
Without any reference to the application of those symbols, this, of itself, is
an important work of criticism, and, if successfully done, would be rendering a
valuable service to the readers of the sacred volume.
(b)
To state, as briefly as possible, what others who have written on this book,
and who have brought eminent learning and talent to bear on its interpretation,
have supposed to be the true interpretation of the symbols employed by John,
and in regard to the times in which the events referred to would occur. It is
in this way only that we can be made acquainted with the real progress made in
interpreting this book, and it will be useful at least to know how the subject
has struck other minds, and how and why they have failed to perceive the truth.
I propose therefore to state, as I go along, some of the theories which have
been held as to the meaning of the Apocalypse, and as to the events which have
been supposed by others to be referred to. My limits require, however, that
this should be briefly done, and forbid my attempting to examine those opinions
at length.
(c)
To state, in as brief and clear a manner as possible, the view which I have
been led to entertain as to the proper application of the symbols employed in
the book, with such historical references as shall seem to me to confirm the
interpretation proposed.
(d)
Where I cannot form an opinion as to the meaning, to confess my ignorance. He
does no service in a professed interpretation of the Bible who passes over a
difficulty without attempting to remove it, or who, to save his own reputation,
conceals the fact that there is a real difficulty; and he does as little
service who is unwilling to confess his ignorance on many points, or who
attempts an explanation where he has no clear and settled views. As his opinion
can be of no value to any one else unless it is based on reasons in his own
mind that will bear examination, so it can usually be of little value unless
those reasons are stated. It is as important for his readers to have those
reasons before their own minds as it is for him; and unless he has it in his
power to state reasons for what he advances, his opinions can be worth nothing
to the world. He who lays down this rule of interpretation may expect to have
ample opportunity in interpreting such a book as the Apocalypse to confess his
ignorance; but he who interprets a book which he believes to be inspired may
console himself with the thought that what is now obscure will be clear
hereafter, and that he performs the best service which he can if he endeavours
to explain the book up to the time in which he lives. There will be
developments hereafter which win make that clear which is now obscure;
developments which will make this book, in all past ages apparently so
enigmatical, as clear as any other portion of the inspired volume, as it is
now, even with the imperfect view which we may have of its meaning, beyond all
question one of the most sublime books that has ever been written.
This
chapter describes the opening of the first six seals.
(1.)
The first discloses a white horse with a rider armed with a bow. A crown is
given to him, symbolical of triumph and prosperity, and he goes forth to
conquer, Rev. 6:1, 2.
(2.)
The second discloses a red-coloured horse with a rider. The emblem is that of
blood‹of sanguinary war. Power is given him to take peace from the earth, and a
sword is given him‹emblem of war, but not of certain victory. Triumph and
prosperity are denoted by the former symbol; war, discord, bloodshed by this,
Rev. 6:3, 4.
(3.)
The third discloses a black horse with a rider. He has a pair of balances in
his hand, as if there were scarcity in the earth, and he announces the price of
grain in the times of this calamity, and a command is given not to hurt the oil
and the wine, Rev. 6:5, 6. The emblem is that of scarcity‹as if there were
oppression, or as a consequence of war or discord, while at the same time there
is care bestowed to preserve certain portions of the produce of the earth from
injury.
(4.)
The fourth discloses a pale horse with a rider. The name of this rider is
Death, and Hell, or Hades, follows him‹as if the hosts of the dead came again
on the earth. Power is given to the rider over the fourth part of the earth, to
kill with sword, with hunger, with death, and with wild beasts. This emblem
would seem to denote war, wide-wasting pestilence, famine, and desolation‹as if
wild beasts were suffered to roam over lands that had been inhabited: something
of which paleness would be an emblem. Here ends the array of horses; and it is
evidently intended by these four symbols to refer to a series of events that
have a general resemblance‹something that could be made to stand by themselves,
and that could be grouped together.
(5.)
The fifth seal opens a new scene. The horse and the rider no longer appear. It
is not a scene of war, and of the consequences of war, but a scene of
persecution. The souls of those who were slain for the word of God and the
testimony which they held are seen under the altar, praying to God that he
would avenge their blood. White robes are given them‹tokens of the Divine
favour, and emblems of their ultimate triumph; and they are commanded to "rest
for a little season, till their fellow-servants and their brethren that should
be killed as they were should be fulfilled:" that is, that they should be
patient until the number of the martyrs was filled up. In other words, there
was
(a)
the assurance of the Divine favour towards them;
(b)
vengeance, or the punishment of those who had persecuted them, would not be
immediate; but
(c)
there was the implied assurance that just punishment would be inflicted on
their persecutors, and that the cause for which they had suffered would
ultimately triumph, Rev. 6:9-11.
(6.)
The opening of the sixth seal, Rev. 6:12-17. There was an earthquake, and the
sun became dark, and the moon was turned to blood, and the stars fell, and all
kings and people were filled with consternation. This symbol properly denotes a
time of public commotion, of revolution, of calamity; and it was evidently to
be fulfilled by some great changes on the earth, or by the overturning of the
seats of power, and by such sudden revolutions as would fill the nations with
alarm.
1. And I saw. Or, I looked. He fixed his eye attentively on
what was passing, as promising important disclosures. No one had been found in
the universe who could open the seals but the Lamb of God, (Rev. 5:2-4) and it
was natural for John, therefore, to look upon the transaction with profound
interest.
When
the Lamb opened one of the seals. See Note on Rev. 5:1, seq. This
was the first or outermost of the seals, and its being broken would permit a
certain portion of the volume to be unrolled and read. See Note on Rev. 5:1.
The
representation in this place is, therefore, that of a volume with a small
portion unrolled, and written on both sides of the parchment.
And
I heard, as it were the noise of thunder. One of the four living creatures
speaking as with a voice of thunder, or with a loud voice.
One
of the four beasts. See Notes on Rev. 4:6, Rev. 4:7.
The
particular one is not mentioned, though what is said in the subsequent verses
leaves no doubt that it was the first in order as seen by John-the one like a
lion, Rev. 4:7. In the opening of the three following seals, it is expressly
said that it was the second, the third, and the fourth of the living creatures
that drew near, and hence the conclusion is certain that the one here referred
to was the first.
If
the four living creatures be understood to be emblematic of the Divine
providential administration, then there was a propriety that they should be
represented as summoning John to witness what was to be disclosed. These events
pertained to the developments of the Divine purposes, and these emblematic
beings would therefore be interested in what was occurring.
Come
and see. Addressed evidently to John. He was requested to approach and see with his
own eyes what was disclosed in the portion of the volume now unrolled. He had
wept much (Rev. 5:4) that no one was found who was worthy to open that book, but
he was now called on to approach and see for himself. Some have supposed (Lord,
in loc.) that the address here was not to John, but to the horse and his
rider, and that the command to them was not to "come and see," but to come
forth, and appear on the stage, and that the act of the Redeemer in
breaking the seal, and unrolling the scroll, was nothing more than an emblem
signifying that it was by his act that the Divine purposes were to be unfolded.
But, in order to this interpretation, it would be necessary to omit from the
received text the words kai blepe‹"and see." This is done indeed by Hahn and Tittman, and
this reading is followed by Professor Stuart, though he says that the received
text has "probability" in its favour, and is followed by some of the critical
editions. The most natural interpretation, however, is that the words were
addressed to John. John saw the Lamb open the seal; he heard the loud voice; he
looked and beheld a white horse‹that is, evidently, he looked on the unfolding
volume, and saw the representation of a horse and his rider. That the voice was
addressed to John is the common interpretation, is the most natural, and is
liable to no real objection.
2. And I saw, and behold. A question has arisen as to the
mode of representation here: whether what John saw in these visions was a
series of pictures, drawn on successive portions of the volume as one seal was
broken after another; or whether the description of the horses and of the
events was written on the volume, so that John read it himself or heard it read by
another; or whether the opening of the seal was merely the occasion of a scenic
representation, in which a succession of horses was introduced, with a written
statement of the events which are referred to. Nothing is indeed said by which
this can be determined with certainty; but the most probable supposition would
seem to be that there was some pictorial representation in form and appearance,
such as he describes in the opening of the six seals. In favour of this it may
be observed
(1)
that, according to the interpretation of Rev. 6:1, it was something in or on the
volume‹since he was invited to draw nearer, in order that he might contemplate
it.
(2.)
Each one of the things under the first five seals where John uses the word
"saw," is capable of being represented by a picture or painting.
(3.)
The language used is not such as would have been employed if he had merely read the
description, or had heard it read.
(4.)
The supposition that the pictorial representation was not in the volume,
but that the opening of the seal was the occasion merely of causing a scenic
representation to pass before his mind, is unnatural and forced. What would be
the use of a sealed volume in that case? What the use of the writing within and
without? On this supposition the representation would be that, as the
successive seals were broken, nothing was disclosed in the volume but a
succession of blank portions, and that the mystery or the difficulty was not in
anything in the volume, but in the want of ability to summon forth these
successive scenic representations. The most obvious interpretation is,
undoubtedly, that what John proceeds to describe was in some way represented in
the volume; and the idea of a succession of pictures or drawings better accords
with the whole representation than the idea that it was a mere written
description. In fact, these successive scenes could be well represented now in
a pictorial form on a scroll.
And
behold a white horse. In order to any definite understanding of what was denoted by
these symbols, it is proper to form in our minds, in the first place, a clear
conception of what the symbol properly represents, or an idea of what it would
naturally convey. It may be assumed that the symbol was significant, and that there
was some reason why that was used rather than another; why, for instance, a horse was
employed rather than an eagle or a lion; why a white horse was
employed in one case, and a red one, a black one, a pale one in the others; why
in this case a bow was in the hand of the rider, and a crown was placed on his
head. Each one of these particulars enters into the constitution of the symbol;
and we must find something in the event which fairly corresponds
with each‹for the symbol is made up of all these things grouped together. It
may be farther observed, that where the general symbol is the same‹as in the
opening of the first four seals‹it may be assumed that the same object or class
of objects is referred to; and the particular things
denoted, or the diversity in the general application, is to be found in the variety in the
representation‹the colour, etc., of the horse, and the arms, apparel, etc., of
the rider. The specifications under the first seal are four:
(1)
the general symbol of the horse‹common to the first four seals;
(2)
the colour of the horse;
(3)
the fact that he that sat on him had a bow; and
(4)
that a crown was given him by some one as indicative of victory. The question
now is, what these symbols would naturally denote.
3. And when he had opened the second seal. So as to
disclose another portion of the volume. See Note on Rev. 5:1.
I
heard the second beast say. The second beast was like a calf or an ox. See
Note on Rev. 4:7.
It
cannot be supposed that there is any special significancy in the fact that the second beast
addressed the seer on the opening of the second seal, or
that, so far as the symbol was concerned, there was any reason why this living
creature should approach on the opening of this seal rather than on either of
the others. All that seems to be designed is, that as the living creatures are
intended to be emblems of the providential government of God, it was proper to
represent that government as concerned in the opening of each of these four
seals indicating important events among the nations.
Come
and see. See Note on Rev. 6:1.
4. And there went out another horse. In this
symbol there were, as in the others, several particulars which it is proper to
explain in order that we may be able to understand its application. The
particular things in the symbol are the following:
(a)
The horse. See Note on Rev. 6:2.
(b)
The colour of the horse: another horse that was red. This
symbol cannot be mistaken. As the white horse denoted prosperity, triumph, and
happiness, so this would denote carnage, discord, bloodshed. This is clear, not
only from the nature of the emblem, but from the explanation immediately added:
"And power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and
that they should kill one another," On the colour, compare
Bochart, Hieroz. P. i. lib. ii. c. vii. p. 104. See also Zech. 1:8. There is no
possibility of mistaking this, that a time of slaughter is denoted
by this emblem.
(c)
The power given to him that sat on the horse: and power was
given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that
they should kill one another. This would seem to indicate that
the condition immediately preceding this was a condition of tranquillity, and
that this was now disturbed by some cause producing discord and bloodshed. This
idea is confirmed by the original words‹thn eirhnhn‹"the peace;"
that is, the previously existing peace. When peace in general is referred to,
the word is used without the article: Matt. 10:34, "Think not that I came to
send peace‹balein
eirhnhn the earth." Compare Luke 1:79; 2:14; 19:38; Mark 5:34; John
14:27; 16:33
Acts
7:26; 9:31, et al. in the Greek. In these cases, the word peace is without the
article. The characteristics of the period referred to by this, are
(a)
that peace and tranquillity existed before;
(b)
that such peace and tranquillity were now taken away, and were succeeded by
confusion and bloodshed; and
(c)
that the particular form of that confusion was civil discord, producing mutual
slaughter: "that they should kill one another."
(d)
The presentation of a sword: and there was given unto him a great sword. As an
emblem of what he was to do, or of the period that was referred to by the
opening of the seal. The sword is an emblem of war, of slaughter, of authority,
(Rom. 13:4) and is here used as signifying that that period would be
characterized by carnage. Compare Isa. 34:5; Rev. 19:17-18; Lev. 26:25; Gen.
27:40; Matt. 10:34; 26:52.
It
is not said by whom the sword was presented, but the fact is merely
referred to, that the rider was presented with a sword as a symbol
of what would occur.
In
inquiring now into the period referred to by this symbol, we naturally look to
that which immediately succeeded the one which was represented by the opening
of the first seal; that is, the period which followed the accession of
Commodus, A.D. 180. We shall find, in the events which succeeded his accession
to the empire, a state of things which remarkably accords with the account
given by John in this emblem‹so much so, that if it were supposed that the book
was written after these events had occurred, and that John had designed to
represent them by this symbol, he could not have selected a more appropriate
emblem. The only authority which it is necessary to refer to here is Mr.
Gibbon; who, as before remarked, seems to have been raised up by a special
Providence to make a record of those events which were referred to by some of
the most remarkable prophecies in the Bible. As he had the highest
qualifications for an historian, his statements may be relied on as accurate;
and as he had no belief in the inspiration of the prophetic records, his
testimony will not be charged with partiality in their favour. The following
particulars, therefore, will furnish a full illustration of the opening of the
second seal:
(a)
The previous state of peace. This is implied in the expression, "and power was
given to him to take peace from the earth." Of this we have
had a full confirmation in the peaceful reign of Hadrian and the Antonines. Mr.
Gibbon, speaking of the accession of Commodus to the imperial throne, says that
he "had nothing to wish, and everything to enjoy. The beloved son of Marcus
[Commodus] succeeded his father amidst the acclamations of the senate and
armies; and when he ascended the throne, the happy youth saw around him neither
competitor to remove, nor enemies to punish. In this calm elevated station, it
was surely natural that he should prefer the love of mankind to their
detestation; the mild glories of his five predecessors to the ignominious fate
of Nero and Domitian," i. 51. So again, on the same page, he says of Commodus,
"His graceful person, popular address, and undisputed virtues, attracted the
public favour; the honourable peace which he had recently granted to the barbarians
diffused an universal joy." No one can doubt that the accession of Commodus was
preceded by a remarkable prevalence of peace and prosperity.
(b)
Civil war and bloodshed: to take peace from the earth, and that they
should kill one another. Of the applicability of this to the time
supposed to be represented by this seal, we have the fullest confirmation in
the series of civil wars commencing with the assassination of the emperor
Commodus, A.D. 193, and continued with scarcely any intervals of intermission
for eighty or ninety years. So Sismondi, on the fall of the Roman empire, (i.
36,) says, "With Commodus' death commenced the third and most calamitous
period. It lasted ninety-two years, from 193 to 284. During that time,
thirty-two emperors, and twenty-seven pretenders to the empire, alternately
hurried each other from the throne, by incessant civil warfare. Ninety-two
years of almost incessant civil warfare taught the world on what a frail
foundation the virtue of the Antonines had reared the felicity of
the empire." The full history of this period may be seen in Gibbon, i. pp.
50‹197. Of course, it is impossible in these Notes to present anything like a
complete account of the characteristics of those times. Yet the briefest
summary may well show the general condition of the Roman empire then, and the
propriety of representing it by the symbol of a red horse, as a period when
peace would be taken from the earth, and when men would kill one another.
Commodus himself is represented by Mr. Gibbon in the following words: "Commodus
was not, as he has been represented, a tiger borne with an insatiate thirst of
human blood, and capable, from his infancy, of the most inhuman actions. Nature
had formed him of a weak rather than a wicked disposition. His simplicity and
timidity rendered him the slave of his attendants, who gradually corrupted his
mind. His cruelty, which at first obeyed the dictates of others, degenerated
into habit, and at length became the ruling passion of his soul," i. 51. During
the first three years of his reign, "his hands were yet unstained with blood,"
(ibid.,) but he soon degenerated into a most severe and bloody tyrant,
and "when Commodus had once tasted human blood, he was incapable of pity or
remorse," i. 52. "The tyrant's rage," says Mr. Gibbon, (i. 62,) "after having
shed the noblest blood of the senate, at length recoiled on the principal
instrument of his cruelty. While Commodus was immersed in blood and
luxury he devolved the detail of public business on Perennis, a servile
and ambitious minister, who had obtained his post by the murder of his
predecessors," etc. "Every sentiment of virtue and humanity was extinct in the
mind of Commodus," i. 55. After detailing the history of his crimes, his
follies, and his cruelties, Mr. Gibbon remarks of him: "His cruelty proved at
last fatal to himself. He had shed with impunity the best blood of Rome: he
perished as soon as he was dreaded by his own domestics. Marcia, his favourite
concubine, Eclectus, his chamberlain, and Laetus, his pretorian prefect,
alarmed by the fate of their companions and predecessors, resolved to prevent
the destruction which every hour hung over their heads, either from the mad
caprice of the tyrant, or the sudden indignation of the people. Marcia seized
the occasion of presenting a draught of wine to her lover, after he had
fatigued himself with hunting some wild beasts. Commodus retired to sleep; but
while he was labouring with the effects of poison and drunkenness, a robust
youth, by profession a wrestler, entered his chamber, and strangled him without
resistance," i. 57. The immediate consequence of the assassination of Commodus
was the elevation of Pertinax to the throne, and his murder eighty-six days
after.‹Decline and Fall, i. 60. Then followed the public setting-up of
the empire to sale by the pretorian guards, and its purchase by a wealthy Roman
senator, Didius Julianus, or Julian, who, "on the throne of the world, found
himself without a friend and without an adherent," i. 63. "The streets and
public places in Rome resounded with clamours and imprecations." "The public
discontent was soon diffused from the centre to the frontiers of the empire,"
i. 63. In the midst of this universal indignation, Septimius Severus, who then
commanded the army in the neighbourhood of the Danube, resolved to avenge the
death of Pertinax, and to seize upon the imperial crown. He marched to Rome,
overcame the feeble Julian, and placed himself on the throne. Julian, after
having reigned sixty-six days, was beheaded in a private apartment of the baths
of the palace, i. 67. "In less than four years, Severus subdued the riches of
the East, and the valour of the West. He vanquished two competitors of
reputation and ability, and defeated numerous armies provided with weapons and
discipline equal to his own," i. 68. Mr. Gibbon then enters into a detail of
"the two civil wars against Niger and Albinus"‹rival competitors
for the empire, (i. 68-70,) both of whom were vanquished, and both of whom were
put to death "in their flight from the field of battle." Yet he says, "Although
the wounds of civil war were apparently healed, its mortal poison still lurked
in the vitals of the constitution," i. 71. After the death of Severus, then
follows an account of the contentions between his sons, Geta and Caracalla, and
of the death of the former by the instigation of the latter, (i. 77;) then of
the remorse of Caracalla, in which it is said that "his disordered fancy often
beheld the angry forms of his father and his brother rising into life to
threaten and upbraid him," (i. 77;) then of the cruelties which Caracalla
inflicted on the friends of Geta, in which "it was computed that, under the
vague appellation of the friends of Get, above twenty thousand persons of both
sexes suffered death," (i. 78;) then of the departure of Caracalla from the
capital, and his cruelties in other parts of the empire, concerning which Mr.
Gibbon remarks, (i. 78, 79;) that "Caracalla was the common enemy of mankind.
Every province was by turns the scene of his rapine and cruelty. In the midst
of peace and repose, upon the slightest provocation, he issued his commands at
Alexandria in Egypt for a general massacre. From a secure post in the temple of
Serapis, he viewed and directed the slaughter of many thousand citizens, as
well as strangers, without distinguishing either the number or the crime of the
sufferers," etc. Then follows the account of the assassination of Caracalla,
(i. 80;) then, and in consequence of that, of the civil war which crushed
Macrinus, and raised Elagabalus to the throne, (i. 83;) then of the life and
follies of that wretched voluptuary, and of his massacre by the pretorian
guards, (i. 86;) then, after an interval of thirteen years, of the murder of
his successor, the second Severus, on the Rhine; then of the civil wars excited
against his murderer and successor, Maximin, in which the two emperors of a
day‹the Gordians, father and son‹perished in Africa, and Maximin himself, and
his son, in the siege of Aquileia; then of the murder at Rome of the two joint emperors,
Maximus and Balbinus; and quickly after that an account of the murder of their
successor in the empire, the third and youngest Gordian, on the banks of the
river Aboras; then of the slaughter of the next emperor Philip, together with
his son and associate in the empire, in the battle near Verona:‹and this state
of things may be said to have continued until the accession of Diocletian to
the empire, A. D. 284. See Decline and Fall, i.
110-197. Does any portion of the history of the world present a similar period
of connected history that would be so striking a fulfilment of the symbols used
here of "peace being taken from the earth," and "men killing one another?" In
regard to this whole period it is sufficient, after reading Mr. Gibbon's
account, to ask two questions:
(1.)
If it were supposed that John lived after this period, and designed to
represent this by an expressive symbol, could he have found one that would have
characterized it better than this does?
(2.)
And if it should be supposed that Mr. Gibbon designed to write a
commentary on this "seal," and to show the exact fulfilment of the symbol,
could he have selected a better portion of history to do it, or could he have
better described facts that would be a complete fulfilment? It is only necessary
to observe further,
(c)
that this is a marked and definite period. It
has such a beginning, and such a continuance and ending, as to show that this
symbol was applicable to this as a period of the world. For it was
not only preceded by a state of peace, as is supposed in the symbol, but no one
can deny that the condition of things in the empire, from Commodus onward
through many years, was such as to be appropriately designated by the symbol
here used.
5, 6. And when he had opened the third seal. Unfolding
another portion of the volume. See Note on Rev. 5:1.
I
heard the third beast say, Come and see. See Note on Rev. 4:7.
It
is not apparent why the third beast is represented as taking a
particular interest in the opening of this seal, (See Note on Rev. 6:3)
nor is it necessary to show why it was so. The general design seems to have
been, to represent each one of the four living creatures as interested in the
opening of the seals, but the order in which they did this does not
seem to be a matter of importance.
And
I beheld, and lo, a black horse. The specifications of the symbol
here are the following:
(a)
As before, the horse.
(b)
The colour of the horse: lo, a black horse. This would
properly denote distress and calamity‹for black has been
regarded always as such a symbol. So Virgil speaks of fear as black:
"atrumque timorem."‹AEn, ix. 619. So again, Georg. iv. 468:
"Caligantem nigra formidine Iucum."
So,
as applied to the dying Acca, AEn. xii. 823:
"Tenebris nigrescunt omnia circum."
Black,
in the Scriptures, is the image of fear, of famine, of death. Lam. 5:10: "Our
skin was black like an oven, because of the terrible famine." Jer. 14:2:
"Because of the drought Judah mourneth, and tile gates thereof languish; they
are in deep mourning [literally, black] for the land." Joel 2:6:
"All faces shall gather blackness." Nahum 2:10: "The knees smite together, and
there is great pain in all loins, and the faces of them all gather blackness."
Compare Rev. 6:12; Ezek. 32:7. See also Bochart, Hieroz. P. i. lib. ii. c. vii.
pp. 106, 107. From the colour of the horse here introduced, we
should naturally look for some dire calamity, though the nature of the
calamity would not be designated by the mere use of the word black. What the
calamity was to be, must be determined by what follows in the symbol. Famine,
pestilence, oppression, heavy taxation, tyranny, invasion‹any of these might be
denoted by the colour of the horse.
(c)
The balances: and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand. The original
word, here rendered a pair of balances, is zugon. This word
properly means a yoke, serving to couple anything together, as a yoke
for cattle. Hence it is used to denote the beam of a
balance, or of a pair of scales‹and is evidently so used here. The idea is,
that something was to be weighed, in order to ascertain either its quantity or its value. Scales or
balances are the emblems of justice or equity, (compare Job 31:6; Psa. 62:9;
Prov. 11:1; 16:11) and when joined with symbols that denote the sale of corn
and fruit by weight, become the symbol of scarcity. Thus "bread by weight"
(Lev. 26:26) denotes scarcity. So in Ezek. 4:16, "And they shall eat bread by
weight." The use of balances here as a symbol would signify that something was
to be accurately and carefully weighed out. The connexion leads us to suppose
that this would appertain to the necessaries of life, and that it would occur
either in consequence of scarcity, or because there would be an accurate or
severe exaction, as in collecting a revenue on these articles. The balance was
commonly the symbol of equity and justice; but it was also, sometimes, the
symbol of exaction and oppression, as in Hos. 12:7: "The balance of deceit is
in his hands: he loveth to oppress." If the balances stood alone, and there
were no proclamation as to what was to occur, we should look, under this seal,
to a time of the exact administration of justice, as scales or balances are now
used as emblems of the rigid application of the laws and of the principles of
justice in courts, or in public affairs. If this
representation stood alone, or if the black horse and the scales constituted
the whole of the symbol, we should look for some severe administration, or
perhaps some heavy calamity under a rigorous administration of laws. The
reference, however, to the "wheat and barley," and to the price for which they
were to be weighed out, serves still further to limit and define the meaning of
the symbol as having reference to the necessaries of life‹to the productions of
the land‹to the actual capital of the country. Whether this refers to scarcity,
or to taxation, or both, must be determined by the other parts of the symbol.
(d)
The proclamation: And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
say. That is, from the throne, Rev. 4:6. The voice was not that of
one of the four beasts, but it seemed to come from among them. As the rider
went forth, this was the proclamation that was made in regard to him; or this
is that which is symbolized in his going forth, to wit, that there would be
such a state of things that a measure of wheat would be sold for a penny, etc.
The proclamation consists essentially of two things‹that which refers to the
price or value of wheat and barley, and that which requires that care shall be
taken not to injure the oil and the wine. Each of these demands explanation.
A
measure of wheat for a penny. See Rev. 9:4. The word rendered measure‹coinix, choenix‹denotes an
Attic measure for grain and things dry, equal to the forty-eighth part of the
Attic medimnus, or the eighth part of the Roman modius, and consequently was
nearly equivalent to one quart English.‹Rob. Lex. The word
rendered penny, dhnarion‹Lat. denarius‹was of the same value as the Greek dracmh, drachme, and was
equivalent to about fourteen cents of our money. This was the usual price of a
day's labour, Matt. 20:2, 9. The choenix, or measure of grain here referred to,
was the ordinary daily allowance for one man.‹Odyss. xix. 27,
28. See Stuart, in loc. The common price of the Attic medimnus of wheat
was five or six denarii; but here, as that contained forty-eight choenixes, or
quarts, the price would be augmented to forty-eight denarii‹or it would be
about eight times as dear as ordinary; that is, there would be a scarcity or
famine. The price of a bushel of wheat at this rate would be
about four dollars and a half of our money‹a price which would indicate great
scarcity, and which would give rise to much distress.
And
three measures of barley for a penny. It would seem from this that
barley usually bore about one-third the price of wheat. It was a less valuable
grain, and perhaps was produced in greater abundance. This is not far from the
proportion which the price of this grain usually bears to that of wheat, and
here, as in the case of the wheat, the thing which would be indicated would be
scarcity. This proclamation of "a measure of wheat for a penny" was heard
either as addressed to the horseman, as a rule of action for him, or
as addressed by the horseman as he went forth. If the former is the meaning, it
would be an appropriate address to one who was going forth to collect
tribute‹with reference to the exact manner in which this tribute was to
be collected, implying some sort of severity of exaction; or to one who should
distribute wheat and barley out of the public granaries at an advanced price,
indicating scarcity. Thus it would mean that a severe and heavy tax‹represented
by the scales and the scarcity‹or a tax so severe as to make grain dear,
was referred to. If the latter is the meaning, then the idea is that there
would be a scarcity, and that grain would be dealt out by the government at a
high and oppressive price. The latter idea would be as consonant with the
symbol of the scales and the price mentioned as the other, if it were not for
the additional injunction not to "hurt the oil and the wine"‹which cannot be
well applied to the idea of dealing out grain at a high price. It can, however,
be connected, by a fair interpretation of that passage, with such a severity of
taxation that there would be a propriety in such a command‹for, as we shall
see, under the explanation of that phrase, such a law was actually promulgated
as resulting from severity of taxation. The idea, then, in the passage before
us would seem to be,
(a)
that there would be a rigid administration of the law in regard to the matter
under consideration‹that pertaining to the productions of the earth‹represented
by the balances; and
(b)
that that would be connected with general scarcity, or such an exercise of this
power as to determine the price of grain, so that the price would be some three
times greater than ordinary.
And
see that thou hurt not the oil and the wine. There has been a great
variety of interpretations proposed of this passage, and it is by no means easy
to determine the true sense. The first inquiry in regard to it is, to whom is
it addressed? Perhaps the most common impression on reading it would be, that
it is addressed to the horseman with the balances, commanding him not to
injure the oliveyards and the vineyards. But this is not probably the correct
view. It does not appear that the horseman goes forth to destroy anything, or
that the effect of his going forth is directly to injure anything. This,
therefore, should not be understood as addressed to the horseman, but should be
regarded as a general command to any and all not to injure
the oliveyards and vineyards; that is, an order that nothing should be done
essentially to injure them. If thus regarded as addressed to others, a fair and
congruous meaning would be furnished by either of the following
interpretations:‹either
(a)
considered as addressed to those who were disposed to be prodigal in their
manner of living, or careless as to the destruction of the crop of the oil and
wine, as they would now be needed; or
(b)
as addressed to those who raised such productions, on the supposition that they
would be taxed heavily, or that large quantities of these productions would be
extorted for revenue, that they should not mutilate their fruit-trees in order to
evade the taxes imposed by the government. In regard to the things specified
here‹oil and wine‹it may be remarked, that they were hardly considered as
articles of luxury in ancient times. They were almost as necessary articles as
wheat and barley. They constituted a considerable part of the food and drink of
the people, as well as furnished a large portion of the revenue, and it would
seem to be with reference to that fact that the command here is given that they
should not be injured; that is, that nothing should be done to diminish the
quantity of oil and wine, or to impair the productive power of oliveyards and
vineyards. The state of things thus described by this seal, as thus
interpreted, would be,
(a)
a rigid administration of the laws of the empire, particularly in reference to
taxation, producing a scarcity among the necessary articles of living;
(b)
a strong tendency, from the severity of the taxation, to mutilate such
kinds of property, with a view either of concealing the real amount of property,
or of diminishing the amount of taxes; and
(c)
a solemn command from some authoritative quarter not to do this.
A command from the ruling power not to do this would meet all that
would be fairly demanded in the interpretation of the
passage; and what is necessary in its application, is to find such a state of
things as would correspond with these predictions; that is, such as a writer would
have described by such symbols on the supposition
that they were referred to.
Now,
it so happens that there were important events which occurred in
the Roman empire, and connected with its decline and fall, of sufficient
importance to be noticed in a series of calamitous events, which corresponded
with the symbol here, as above explained. They were such as these:
(a)
The general severity of taxation, or the oppressive burdens laid on the
people by the emperors. In the account which Mr. Gibbon gives of the operation
of the Indictions, and Superindictions, though the specific laws on this
subject pertained to a subsequent period, the general nature of the taxation of
the empire and its oppressive character may be seem‹Decline and Fall, i.
357-359. A general estimate of the amount of revenue to be exacted was made
out, and the collecting of this was committed to the Pretorian prefects, and to
a great number of subordinate officers. "The lands were measured by surveyors
who were sent into the provinces; their nature, whether arable, or pasture, or
woods, was distinctly reported; and an estimate made of their common value,
from the average produce of five years. The number of slaves and of cattle
constituted an essential part of the report; an oath was administered to the
proprietors which bound them to disclose the true state of their affairs; and
their attempts to prevaricate or elude the intention of the legislature were
severely watched, and punished as a capital crime, which included the double
guilt of treason and of sacrilege. According to the different nature of lands,
their real produce in the various articles of wine or oil, corn or
barley, wood or iron, was transported by the labour or at the expense of the
provincials to the imperial magazines, from whence they were occasionally
distributed for the use of the court or of tile army, and of the two capitals,
Rome and Constantinople," i.p. 358. Comp. Lactant. de Mort. Persecut. c. 23.
(b)
The particular order, under this oppressive system of taxation, respecting the
preservation of vineyards and oliveyards, may be referred to, also, as
corresponding to the command sent forth under this rider, not to "hurt the oil
and the wine." That order was in the following words: "If any one shall
sacrilegiously cut a vine, or stint the fruit of prolific boughs, and craftily
feign poverty in order to avoid a fair assessment, he shall immediately on
detection suffer death, and his property be confiscated."‹Cod. Theod. 1. xiii.
lib. xi. seq.; Gibbon, i. 358, note. Mr. Gibbon remarks, "Although this law is
not without its studied obscurity, it is, however, clear enough to prove the minuteness
of the inquisition and the disproportion of the penalty."
(c)
Under this general subject of the severity of taxation‹as a fact far-spreading
and oppressive, and as so important as to hasten the downfall of the empire,
may be noticed a distinct edict of Caracalla as occurring more directly in the
period in which the rider with the balances may be supposed to have gone forth.
This is stated by Mr. Gibbon, (i. 91,) as one of the important causes which
contributed to the downfall of the empire. "The personal characters of the
emperors, their victories, laws, and fortunes," says he, "can interest us no
farther than they are connected with the general history of the decline and
fall of the monarchy. Our constant attention to that object will not suffer us
to overlook a most important edict of Antoninus Caracalla, which communicated
to all the free inhabitants of the empire the name and privileges of Roman
citizens. His unbounded liberality flowed not, however, from the sentiments of
a generous mind: it was the sordid result of avarice," etc. He then proceeds,
at length, to state the nature and operations of that law, by which a heavy
tax, under the pretence of liberality, was in fact imposed on all the citizens
of the empire‹a fact which, in its ultimate results, the historian of the
Decline and Fall regards as so closely connected with the termination of the
empire. See Gibbon, i. pp. 91-95. After noticing the laws of Augustus, Nero,
and the Antonines, and the real privileges conferred by them on those who became
entitled to the rank of Roman citizens‹privileges which were a compensation in
the honour, dignity, and offices of that rank for the measure of taxation which
it involved, he proceeds to notice the fact that the title of "Roman
citizen" was conferred by Caracalla on all the free citizens of the empire,
involving the subjection to all the heavy taxes usually imposed on those who
sustained the rank expressed by the title, but with nothing of the compensation
connected with the title when it was confined to the inhabitants of Italy. "But
the favour," says he, "which implied a distinction, was lost in the prodigality
of Caracalla, and the reluctant provincials were compelled to assume the
vain title, and the real obligations, of Roman citizens. Nor was
the rapacious son of Severus [Caracalla] contented with such a measure of
taxation as had appeared sufficient to his moderate predecessors. Instead of a
twentieth, he exacted a tenth of all legacies and inheritances; and during his
reign he crushed alike every part of the empire under the weight of his iron
sceptre," i. 95. So again, (ibid.,) speaking of the taxes which had
been lightened somewhat by Alexander, Mr. Gibbon remarks, "It is impossible to
conjecture the motive that engaged him to spare so trifling a remnant of the
soil; but the noxious weed, which find not been totally eradicated, again
sprung up with the most luxuriant growth, and in the succeeding age darkened
the Roman world with its deadly shade. In the course of this history, we shall
be too often summoned to explain the land-tax, the capitation, and the heavy
contributions of corn, wine, oil, and meat, which were exacted of
the province for the use of the court, the army, and the capital." In reference
to this whole matter of taxation as being one of the things which
contributed to the downfall of the empire, and which spread woe through the
falling empire‹a woe worthy to be illustrated by one of the seals‹a
confirmation may be derived from the reign of Galerius, who, as Caesar, acted
under the authority of Diocletian; who excited Diocletian to the work of
persecution, (Decline and Fall, i. 317, 318;) and who, on the
abdication of Diocletian, assumed the title of Augustus.- Decline and Fall, i. 222. Of
his administration in general, Mr. Gibbon (i. 226) remarks: "About that time,
the avarice of Galerius, or perhaps the exigencies of the state, had induced
him to make a very strict and rigorous inquisition into the property of his
subjects for the purpose of a general taxation, both on their lands and on
their persons. A very minute survey appears to have been taken of their real
estates; and wherever there was the slightest concealment, torture was very
freely employed to obtain a sincere declaration of their real wealth." Of the
nature of this exaction under Galerius; of the cruelty with which the measure
was prosecuted‹particularly in its bearing on Christians, towards whom Galerius
cherished a mortal enmity, (Decline and Fall, i. 317;)
and of the extent and severity of the suffering among Christians and others,
caused by it, the following account of Lactantius (De Mort. Persecut. c. 23)
will furnish a painful but most appropriate illustration:‹"Swarms of exactors
sent into the provinces and cities filled them with agitation and terror, as
though a conquering enemy were leading them into captivity. The fields were
separately measured, the trees and vines, the flocks and herds numbered, and an
examination made of the men. In the cities, the cultivated and rude were united
as of the same rank. The streets were crowded with groups of families, and
every one required to appear with his children and slaves. Tortures and lashes
resounded on every side. Sons were gibbeted in the presence of their parents,
and the most confidential servants harassed that they might make disclosures
against their masters, and wives that they might testify unfavourably of their
husbands. If there were a total destitution of property, they were still
tortured to make acknowledgments against themselves, and, when overcome by pain,
inscribed for what they did not possess. Neither age nor ill-health was
admitted as an excuse for not appearing. The sick and weak were borne to the
place of inscription, a reckoning made of the age of each, and years added to
the young and deducted from the old, in order to subject them to a higher
taxation than the law imposed. The whole scene was filled with wailing and
sadness. In the mean time individuals died, and the herds and the flocks
diminished, yet tribute was none the less required to be paid for the dead, so
that it was no longer allowed either to live or die without a tax. Mendicants
alone escaped, where nothing could be wrenched, and whom misfortune and misery
had made incapable of farther oppression. These the impious wretch affecting to
pity, that they might not suffer want, ordered to be assembled, borne off in
vessels, and plunged into the sea." See Lord on the Apoc. pp. 128, 129. These
facts in regard to the severity of taxation, and the rigid nature of the law
enforcing it; to the sources of the revenue exacted in the provinces, and to
the care that none of those sources should be diminished; and to the actual and
undoubted bearing of all this on the decline and fall of the empire, are so
strikingly applicable to the symbol here employed, that if it be supposed that
it was intended to refer to them, no more natural or expressive symbol could have
been used; if it were supposed that the historian meant to make a
record of the fulfilment, he could not well have made a search which would more
strikingly accord with the symbol. Were we now to
represent these things by a symbol, we could scarcely find one that would be
more expressive than that of a rider on a black horse with a pair of scales,
sent forth under a proclamation which indicated that there would be a most
rigid and exact administration of severe and oppressive laws, and with a
special command, addressed to the people, not for the purposes of concealment,
or from opposition to the government, to injure the sources of revenue.
6. See Note on Rev. 6:5
7. And when he had opened the fourth seal. See Note
on Rev. 5:1.
I
heard the voice of the fourth beast say. The flying eagle. See Note on Rev.
4:7.
As
in the other cases, there does not appear to have been any particular reason
why the fourth of the living creatures should have made this proclamation rather
than either of the others. It was poetic and appropriate to represent each one
in his turn as making proclamation.
Come
and see. See Note on Rev. 6:1.
8. And I looked, and behold a pale horse‹ippoß clwroß. On the horse, as an
emblem, See Note on Rev. 6:2.
The
peculiarity of this emblem consists in the colour of the
horse, the rider, and the power that was given unto him. In these there is
entire harmony, and there can be comparatively little difficulty in the
explanation and application. The colour of the horse was pale‹clwroß. This word
properly means pale-green, yellowish-green, like the
colour of the first shoots of grass and herbage; then green, verdant, like young
herbage, Mark 6:39; Rev. 8:7; Rev. 9:4; and then pale, yellowish.‹Rob.
Lex. The colour here would be an appropriate one to denote the reign
of Death‹as one of the most striking effects of death is paleness‹and, of
course, of death produced by any cause, famine, pestilence, or the sword. From
this portion of the symbol, if it stood with nothing to limit and define it, we
should naturally look for some condition of things in which death would prevail
in a remarkable manner, or in which multitudes of human beings would be swept
away. And yet, perhaps, from the very nature of this part of the
symbol, we should look for the prevalence of death in some such peaceful manner
as by famine or disease. The red colour would more naturally denote
the ravages of death in war; the black, the ravages of death by sudden
calamity; the pale would more obviously suggest famine or wasting disease.
And
his name that sat on him was Death. No description is given of his
aspect; nor does he appear with any emblem‹as sword, or spear, or bow. There is
evident scope for the fancy to picture to itself the form of the Destroyer; and
there is just that kind of obscurity about it which contributes to sublimity.
Accordingly, there has been ample room for the exercise of the imagination in
the attempts to paint "Death on the pale horse," and the opening of this seal
has furnished occasion for some of the greatest triumphs of the pencil. The
simple idea in this portion of the symbol is, that Death would reign or
prevail under the opening of this seal‹whether by sword, by famine, or by
pestilence, is to be determined by other descriptions in the symbol.
And
Hell followed with him. Attended him as he went forth. On the meaning
of the word here rendered hell‹adhß‹hades, See Notes
on Luke 16:23; Job 10:21; Isa. 14:9.
It
is here used to denote the abode of the dead, considered as a place where they
dwell, and not in the more restricted sense in which the word is now commonly
used as a place of punishment. The idea is, that the dead would be so numerous
at the going forth of this horseman, that it would seem as if the pale nations
of the dead had come again upon the earth. A vast retinue of the dead would
accompany him; that is, it would be a time when death would prevail on the
earth, or when multitudes would die.
And
power was given unto them. Marg., to him. The common
Greek text is autoiß‹to them. There are many MSS., however, which read autw‹to him. So
Professor Stuart reads it. The authority, however, is in favour of them as the
reading; and, according to this, death and his train are regarded as grouped
together, and the power is considered as given to them collectively. The sense
is not materially varied.
Over
the fourth part of the earth. That is, of the Roman world. It is
not absolutely necessary to understand this as extending over precisely a fourth
part of the world. Compare Rev. 8:7-10, 12; 9:15, et al.
Undoubtedly we are to look in the fulfilment of this to some far-spread
calamity; to some severe visitations which would sweep off great multitudes of
men. The nature of that visitation is designated in the following specifications.
To
kill with sword. In war and discord‹and we are, therefore, to look to a period of
war.
And
with hunger. With famine‹one of the accompaniments of war‹where armies ravage
a nation, trampling down the crops of grain; consuming the provisions laid up;
employing in war, or cutting off the men who would be occupied in cultivating
the ground; making it necessary that they should take the field at a time when
the grain should be sown or the harvest collected; and shutting up the people
in besieged cities to perish by hunger. Famine has been not an unfrequent
accompaniment of war; and we are to look for the fulfilment of this in its
extensive prevalence.
And
with death. Each of the other forms‹"with the sword and with hunger"‹imply
that death would reign; for it is said that "power was given to kill with sword
and with hunger." This word, then, must refer to death in some other form‹to
death that seemed to reign without any such visible cause as
the "sword" and "hunger." This would well denote the pestilence‹not an
unfrequent accompaniment of war. For nothing is better fitted to produce this
than the unburied bodies of the slain; the filth of a camp; the want of food;
and the crowding together of multitudes in a besieged city: and, accordingly,
the pestilence, especially in Oriental countries, has been often closely
connected with war. That the pestilence is referred to here, is
rendered more certain by the fact that the Hebrew word rRbR;d pestilence, which
occurs about fifty times in the Old Testament, is rendered qanatoß, death, more than
thirty times in the Septuagint.
And
with the beasts of the earth. With wild beasts. This, too, would
be one of the consequences of war, famine, and pestilence. Lands would be
depopulated, and wild beasts would be multiplied. Nothing more is necessary to
make them formidable than a prevalence of these things; and nothing, in the
early stages of society, or in countries ravaged by war, famine, and the
pestilence, is more formidable. Homer, at the very beginning of his Iliad,
presents us with a representation similar to this. Compare Ezek. 14:21: "I send
my sore four judgments upon Jerusalem, the sword, and the famine, and the
noisome beast, and the pestilence," rRbR;d‹Sept., as here, qanaton. See also 2
Kings 17:26.
In
regard to the fulfilment of this there can be little difficulty, if the
principles adopted in the interpretation of the first three seals are correct.
We may turn to Gibbon, and, as in the other cases, we shall find that he has
been an unconscious witness of the fidelity of the representation in this seal.
Two general remarks may be made before there is an attempt to illustrate the
particular things in the symbol.
(a)
The first relates to the place in the order of time, or in
history, which this seal occupies. If the three former seals have been located
with any degree of accuracy, we should expect that this would follow, not very
remotely, the severe laws pertaining to taxation, which, according to Mr.
Gibbon, contributed so essentially to the downfall of the empire. And if it be
admitted to be probable that the fifth seal refers to a time of persecution, it
would be most natural to fix this period between those times and the times of Diocletian,
when the persecution ceased. I may be permitted to say, that I was led to fix
on this period without having any definite view beforehand of what occurred in it, and was
surprised to find in Mr. Gibbon what seems to be so accurate a
correspondence with the symbol.
(b)
The second remark is, that the general characteristics of this
period, as stated by Mr. Gibbon, agree remarkably with what we should expect of
the period from the symbol. Thus speaking of this whole period, (A.D. 243-268,)
embracing the reigns of Decius, Gallus, AEmilianus, Valerian, and Gallienus, he
says, "From the great secular games celebrated by Philip to the death of the
emperor Gallienus, there elapsed twenty years of shame and misfortune. During
this calamitous period, every instant of time was marked, every province of the
Roman world was afflicted by barbarous invaders and military tyrants, and the
wearied empire seemed to approach the last and fatal moment of its
dissolution," i. 135.
In
regard to the particular things referred to in the symbol, the following
specifications may furnish a sufficient confirmation and illustration:
(a)
The killing with the sword. A fulfilment of this, so far as the words are
concerned, might be found indeed in many portions of Roman history, but no one
can doubt that it was eminently true of this period. It was the period of the first Gothic
invasion of the Roman empire; the period when those vast hordes, having
gradually come down from the regions of Scandinavia, and having moved along the
Danube towards the Ukraine and the countries bordering on the Borysthenes,
invaded the Roman territories from the East, passed over Greece, and made their
appearance almost, as Mr. Gibbon says, within sight of Rome. Of this invasion,
Mr. Gibbon says, "This is the first considerable occasion [the fact that the
emperor Decius was summoned to the banks of the Danube, A.D. 250, by the
invasion of the Goths] in which history mentions that great people, who
afterwards broke the Roman power, sacked the capital, and reigned in Gaul,
Spain, and Italy. So memorable was the part which they acted in the subversion
of the Western empire, that the name of GOTHS is frequently, but improperly,
used as a general appellation of rude and warlike barbarism," i. p. 136. As one
of the illustrations that the "sword" would be used by "Death" in this period,
we may refer to the siege and capture of Philippolis. "A hundred thousand
persons are reported to have been massacred in the sack of that great city."‹Decline
and Fall, i. 140. "The whole period," says Mr. Gibbon, speaking of the
reigns of Valerian and Gallienus, "was one uninterrupted series of confusion
and calamity. The Roman empire was, at the same time, and on every side,
attacked by the blind fury of foreign invaders, and the wild ambition of
domestic usurpers," i. 144. "Such were the barbarians," says Mr. Gibbon, in the
close of his description of the Goths at this period, and of the tyrants that
reigned, "and such the tyrants, who, under the reigns of Valerian and Gallienus,
dismembered the provinces, and reduced the empire to the lowest pitch of
disgrace and ruin, from whence it seemed impossible that it should ever
emerge," i. 158.
(b)
Famine: "Shall kill with hunger." This would naturally be the consequence of
long-continued wars, and of such invasions as those of the Goths. Mr. Gibbon
says of this period, "Our habits of thinking so fondly connect the order of the
universe with the fate of man, that this gloomy period of history has been
decorated with inundations, earthquakes, uncommon meteors, preternatural
darkness, and a crowd of prodigies, fictitious or exaggerated. But a long
and general famine was a calamity of a more serious kind. It was the inevitable
consequence of rapine and oppression, which extirpated the produce of the
present, and the hope of future harvests," i. p. 159. Prodigies, and
preternatural darkness, and earthquakes, were not seen in the
vision of the opening of the seal‹but war and famine were; and
the facts stated by Mr. Gibbon are such as would be now appropriately
symbolized by Death on the pale horse.
(c)
Pestilence: "And shall kill with death." Of the pestilence which raged in this
period, Mr. Gibbon makes the following remarkable statement, in immediate
connexion with what he says of the famine: "Famine is almost always followed by
epidemical diseases, the effect of scanty and unwholesome food. Other causes
must, however have contributed to the furious plague, which, from the year 250
to the year 265, raged without interruption in every province, every city,
and almost every family in the Roman empire. During
some time, five thousand persons died daily at Rome; and many towns that had
escaped the hands of the barbarians were entirely depopulated," i. 169.
(d)
Wild beasts: "And shall kill with the beasts of the earth." As already
remarked, these are formidable enemies in the early stages of society, and when
a country becomes from any cause depopulated. They are not mentioned by Mr.
Gibbon as contributing to the decline and fall of the empire, or as connected
with the calamities that came upon the world at that period. But no one can
doubt that in such circumstances they would be likely to abound, especially if
the estimate of Mr. Gibbon be correct, (i. 169,) when, speaking of these times,
and making an estimate of the proportion of the inhabitants of Alexandria that
had perished‹which he says was more than one-half‹he adds, "Could one venture
to extend the analogy to the other provinces, we might suspect that war,
pestilence, and famine had consumed in a few years the
moiety of the human species." Yet, though not adverted to by Mr. Gibbon, there is a record
pertaining to this very period, which shows that this was one of the calamities
with which the world was then afflicted. It occurs in Arnobius, Adv. Gentes,
lib. i. p. 6. Within a few years after the death of Gallienus, (about A.D.
300,) he speaks of wild beasts in such a manner as to show that they were
regarded as a sore calamity. The public peril and suffering on this account
were so great, that, in common with other evils, this was charged on Christians
as one of the judgments of heaven which they brought upon the world. In
defending Christians against the general charge that these judgments were sent
from heaven on their account, he adverts to the prevalence of wild beasts, and
shows that they could not have been sent as a judgment on account of the
existence of Christianity, by the fact that they had prevailed also in the
times of heathenism, long before Christianity was introduced into the empire.
"Quando cum feris bella, et proelia cum leonibus gesta sunt? Non ante nos?
Quando pernicies populis venenatis ab anguibus data est? Non ante nos?" "When
were wars waged with wild beasts, and contests with lions? Was it not before
our times? When did a plague come upon men poisoned by serpents? Was it not
before our times?" In regard to the extent of the destruction which
these causes would bring upon the world, there is a remarkable confirmation in
Gibbon. To say, as is said in the account of the seal, that "a fourth part of the
earth" would be subjected to the reign of death by the sword, by famine, by
pestilence, and by wild beasts, may seem to many to be an improbable
statement‹a statement for the fulfilment of which we should look in vain to any
historical records. Yet Mr. Gibbon, without expressly mentioning the plague of
wild beasts, but referring to the three others‹"war, pestilence, and
famine"‹goes into a calculation, in a passage already referred to, by which he
shows that it is probable that from these causes half the human
race was destroyed. The following is his estimate: "We have the knowledge of a
very curious circumstance, of some use perhaps in the melancholy calculation of
human calamities. An exact register was kept at Alexandria of all the citizens
entitled to receive the distribution of corn. It was found that the ancient
number of those comprised between the ages of forty and seventy had been equal
to the whole sum of the claimants, from fourteen to fourscore years of age, who
remained alive after the death of Gallienus. Applying this authentic fact to
the most correct tables of mortality, it evidently proves that above half of
the people of Alexandria had perished; and could we venture to extend the
analogy to other provinces, we might suspect that war, pestilence,
and famine had consumed in a few years the moiety of the human
species," i. 159. The historian says that it might be "suspected" from these
data that one-half of the human race had been cut off in a few years, from
these causes; in the Apocalyptic vision it is said that power was given over
one "fourth" of the earth. We may remark
(a)
that the description in the symbol is as likely to be
correct as the "suspicion" of the historian; and
(b)
that his statement that in this period "a moiety of the race," or one-half of
the race, perished, takes away all improbability from the prediction, and gives
a most graphic confirmation of the symbol of Death on the pale horse. If such a
desolation in fact occurred, there is no improbability in the supposition that
it might have been prefigured by the opening of a prophetic seal. Such a
wide-spread desolation would be likely to be referred to in a
series of symbols that were designed to represent the downfall of the Roman
power, and the great changes in human affairs that would affect the welfare of
the church.
9-11. And when he had opened the fifth seal. See Notes
on Rev. 5:1; Rev. 6:1.
I
saw under the altar. The four living creatures are no longer heard as in the opening
of the first four seals. No reason is given for the change in the manner of the
representation; and none can be assigned, unless it be, that having represented
each one of the four living creatures in their turn as calling attention to the
remarkable events about to occur, there seemed to be no necessity or propriety
in introducing them again. In itself considered, it cannot be supposed that
they would be any less interested in the events about to be disclosed than they
were in those which preceded. This seal pertains to martyrs‹as the
former successively did to a time of prosperity and triumph; to discord and
bloodshed; to oppressive taxation; to war, famine, and pestilence. In the
series of woes, it was natural and proper that there should be a vision of
martyrs, if it was intended that the successive seals should refer to coming
and important periods of the world; and accordingly we have here a striking
representation of the martyrs crying to God to interpose in their behalf and to
avenge their blood. The points which require elucidation are
(a)
their position-under the altar;
(b)
their invocation‹or their prayer that they might be avenged;
(c)
the clothing of them with robes; and
(d)
the command to wait patiently a little time.
(1.)
The position of the martyrs: under the altar. There were
in the temple at Jerusalem two altars‹the altar of burnt sacrifices, and the
altar of incense. The altar here referred to was probably the former. This
stood in front of the temple, and it was on this that the daily sacrifice was
made. See Note on Matt. 5:23, seq. We are to remember, however, that the temple
and the altar were both destroyed before the time when this book was written,
and this should, therefore, be regarded merely as a vision. John saw these
souls as if they were collected under the altar at the place where the
sacrifice for sin was made‹offering their supplications. Why they are
represented as being there is not so apparent; but probably two suggestions
will explain this:
(a)
The altar was the place where sin was expiated, and it was natural to represent
these redeemed martyrs as seeking refuge there; and
(b)
it was usual to offer prayers and supplications at the altar,
in connexion with the sacrifice made for sin, and on the ground of that
sacrifice. The idea is, that they who were suffering persecution would
naturally seek a refuge in the place where expiation was made for sin, and
where prayer was appropriately offered. The language here is
such as a Hebrew would naturally use; the idea is
appropriate to any one who believes in the atonement, and who supposes that
that is the appropriate refuge for those who are in trouble. But while the
language here is such as a Hebrew would use, and while the reference in the
language is to the altar of burnt sacrifice, the scene should be regarded as
undoubtedly laid in heaven‹the temple where God resides. The whole
representation is that of fleeing to the atonement, and pleading with God in
connexion with the sacrifice for sin.
The
souls of them that were slain. That had been put to death by
persecution. This is one of the incidental proofs in the Bible that the soul
does not cease to exist at death, and also that it does not cease to be
conscious, or does not sleep till the resurrection. These souls of the martyrs
are represented as still in existence; as remembering what had occurred on the
earth; as interested in what was now taking place; as engaged in prayer; and as
manifesting earnest desires for the Divine interposition to avenge the wrongs
which they had suffered.
For
the word of God. On account of the word or truth of God. See Note on Rev. 1:9.
And
for the testimony which they held. On account of their testimony to
the truth, or being faithful witnesses of the truth of Jesus Christ. See Note
on Rev. 1:9.
(2.)
The invocation of the martyrs, Rev. 6:10: And they cried with a loud
voice. That is, they pleaded that their blood might be avenged.
Saying,
How long, Lord, holy and true. They did not doubt that God would
avenge them, but they inquire how long the vengeance would be
delayed. It seemed to them that God was slow to interpose, and to check the
persecuting power. They appeal therefore to him as a God of holiness and truth;
that is, as one who could not look with approval on sin, and in whose sight the
wrongs inflicted by the persecuting power must be infinitely offensive; as one
who was true to his promises, and faithful to his people. On the ground of his
own hatred of wrong, and of his plighted faithfulness to his church, they
pleaded that he would interpose.
Dost
thou not judge and avenge our blood. That is, dost thou forbear to judge
and avenge us; or dost thou delay to punish those who have persecuted and slain
us. They do not speak as if they had any doubt that it would be done, nor as if
they were actuated by a spirit of revenge; but as if it would be proper that there
should be an expression of the Divine sense of the wrongs that had been done
them. It is not right to desire vengeance or revenge; it is to desire that
justice should be done, and that the government of God should be vindicated.
The word "judge" here may either mean "judge us," in the
sense of "vindicate us," or it may refer to their persecutors, meaning
"judge them." The more probable sense is the latter: "How long dost thou
forbear to execute judgment on our account on those that dwell on the earth?"
The word avenge‹ekdikew‹means to do justice; to execute punishment.
On
them that dwell on the earth. Those who are still on the earth.
This shows that the scene here is laid in heaven, and that the souls of the
martyrs are represented as there. We are not to suppose that this literally occurred,
and that John actually saw the souls of the martyrs beneath the altars‹for the
whole representation is symbolical; nor are we to suppose that the injured and the
wronged in heaven actually pray for vengeance on those who wronged them, or
that the redeemed in heaven will continue to pray with reference to things on
the earth; but it may be fairly inferred from this that there will be as
real a remembrance of the wrongs of the persecuted, the injured, and
the oppressed, as if such prayer were offered there; and that the
oppressor has as much to dread from the Divine vengeance as if those whom he
has injured should cry in heaven to the God who hears prayer, and who takes
vengeance. The wrongs done to the children of God; to the orphan, the widow,
the down-trodden; to the slave and the outcast, will be as certainly remembered
in heaven as if they who are wronged should plead for vengeance there, for
every act of injustice and oppression goes to heaven and pleads for vengeance.
Every persecutor should dread the death of the persecuted as if he went to
heaven to plead against him; every cruel master should dread the death of his
slave that is crushed by wrongs; every seducer should dread the death and the
cries of his victim; every one who does wrong in any way should remember that
the sufferings of the injured cry to heaven with a martyr's pleadings, saying,
"How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood?"
(3.)
The robes that were given to the martyrs: And white robes were
given unto every one of them. Emblems of purity or innocence.
See Note on Rev. 3:5.
Here
the robes would be an emblem of their innocence as martyrs; of the Divine
approval of their testimony and lives, and a pledge of their future
blessedness.
(4.)
The command to wait: And it was said unto them, that they should
rest yet for a little season. That is, that they must wait for a
little season before they could be avenged as they desired, Rev. 6:10. They had
pleaded that their cause might be at once vindicated, and had asked how long it
would be before it should be done. The reply is, that the desired vindication
would not at once occur, but that they must wait until other events were
accomplished. Nothing definite is determined by the phrase "a little season,"
or a short time. It is simply an intimation that this would not immediately occur, or
was not soon to take place. Whether it refers to an existing persecution, and
to the fact that they were to wait for the Divine interposition until that was
over, and those who were then suffering persecution should be put to death and
join them; or whether to a series of persecutions stretching along in the
history of the world, in such a sense that the promised vengeance would take
place only when all those persecutions were passed, and the number of the
martyrs completed, cannot be determined from the meaning of their words. Either
of these suppositions would accord well with what the language naturally
expresses.
Until
their fellow-servants also. Those who were then suffering persecution, or
those who should afterwards suffer persecution, grouping all together.
And
their brethren. Their brethren as Christians, and their brethren in trial: those
then living, or those who would live afterwards and pass through similar
scenes.
Should
be fulfilled. That is, till these persecutions were passed through, and the
number of the martyrs was complete. The state of things represented here would
seem to be, that there was then a persecution raging on the earth. Many had
been put to death, and their souls had fled to heaven, where they pleaded that
their cause might be vindicated, and that their oppressors and persecutors
might be punished. To this the answer was, that they were now
safe and happy‹that God approved their course, and that in token of his
approbation, they should be clothed in white raiment; but that the invoked
vindication could not at once occur. There were others who would yet be called
to suffer as they had done, and they must wait until all that number was
completed. Then, it is implied, God would interpose, and vindicate his name. The
scene, therefore, is laid in a time of persecution, when many had already died,
and when there were many more that were exposed to death; and a sufficient
fulfilment of the passage, so far as the words are
concerned, would be found in any persecution, where many might be
represented as having already gone to heaven, and where there was a certainty
that many more would follow. We naturally, however, look for the fulfilment of
it in some period succeeding those designated by the preceding symbols. There
would be no difficulty, in the early history of the church, in finding events
that would correspond with all that is represented by the symbol; but it is
natural to look for it in a period succeeding that represented, under the
fourth seal, by death on the pale horse. If the previous seals have been
correctly interpreted, we shall not be much in danger of erring in supposing
that this refers to the persecution under Diocletian; and perhaps we may find
in one who never intended to write a word that could be construed as furnishing
a proof of the fulfilment of the prophecies of the New Testament, what should be
regarded as a complete verification of all that is represented here. The
following particulars may justify this application:
(a)
The place of that persecution in history: or the time when it occurred. As
already remarked, if the previous seals have been rightly explained, and the
fourth seal denotes the wars, the famine, and the pestilence, under the
invasion of the Goths, and in the time of Valerian and Gallienus, then the last
great persecution of the church under Diocletian would well accord with the
period in history referred to. Valerian died in A.D. 260, being flayed alive by
Sapor, king of Persia; Gallienus died in A.D. 268, being killed at Milan.
Diocletian ascended the throne A.D. 284, and resigned the purple A.D. 304. It
was during this period, and chiefly at the instigation of Galerius, that the
tenth persecution of the Christians occurred‹the last under the Roman power;
for, in A. D. 306, Constantine ascended the throne, and ultimately became the
protector of the church.
(b)
The magnitude of this persecution under Diocletian is as consonant to the
representation here as its place in history. So important was it, that, in a
general chapter on the persecutions of the Christians, Mr. Gibbon has seen fit,
in his remarks on the nature, causes, extent, and character of the
persecutions, to give a prominence to this which he has not assigned to any
others, and to attach an importance to it which he has not to any other. See
vol. i. pp. 317-322. The design of this persecution, as Mr. Gibbon
expresses it, (i. 318,) was "to set bounds to the progress of Christianity;"
or, as he elsewhere expresses it, (on the same page,) "the destruction of
Christianity." Diocletian, himself naturally averse from persecution, was
excited to this by Galerius, who urged upon the emperor every argument by which
he could persuade him to engage in it. Mr. Gibbon says in regard to this,
"Galerius at length extorted from him [Diocletian] the permission of summoning
a council, composed of a few persons, the most distinguished in the civil and
military department of the state. It may be presumed that they insisted on
every topic which might interest the pride, the piety, the fears of their
sovereign in the destruction of Christianity," i. 318.
The purpose, evidently, in the persecution, was, to make a last and desperate
effort through the whole Roman empire for the destruction of the Christian
religion; for Mr. Gibbon (i. 320) says, that "the edict against the Christians
was designed for a general law of the whole empire." Other
efforts had failed. The religion still spread, notwithstanding the rage and
fury of nine previous persecutions. It was resolved to make one more effort.
This was designed by the persecutors to be the last, in the hope that then the
Christian name would cease to be: in the Providence of God it was the
last‹for then even these opposing powers became convinced that the religion
could not be destroyed in this manner‹and as this persecution was to establish
this fact, it was an event of sufficient magnitude to be symbolized by the
opening of one of the seals.
(c)
The severity of this persecution accorded with the description here, and was
such as to deserve a place in the series of important events which were to
occur in the world. We have seen above, from the statement of Mr. Gibbon, that
it was designed for the "whole empire," and it in fact raged with fury
throughout the empire. After detailing some of the events of local persecutions
under Diocletian, Mr. Gibbon says, "The resentment or the fears of Diocletian at
length transported him beyond the bounds of moderation, which he had hitherto
preserved, and he declared, in a series of edicts, his intention of abolishing
the Christian name. By the first of these edicts, the governors of the
provinces were directed to apprehend all persons of the ecclesiastical order;
and the prisons destined for the vilest criminals were soon filled with a
multitude of bishops, presbyters, deacons, and exorcists. By a second edict,
the magistrates were commanded to employ every method of severity which might
reclaim them from their odious superstition, and oblige them to return to the
established worship of the gods. This rigorous order was extended, by a
subsequent edict, to the whole body of Christians, who were exposed to a
violent and general persecution. Instead of those solitary restraints, which
had required the direct and solemn testimony of an accuser, it became the duty
as well as the interest of the imperial officers to discover, to pursue, and to
torment the most obnoxious among the faithful. Heavy penalties were denounced
against all who should presume to save a proscribed sectary from the just
indignation of the gods, and of the emperors," i. 322. The first decree against
the Christians, at the instigation of Galerius, will show the general nature of
this fiery trial of the church. That decree was to the following effect: "All
assembling of the Christians for the purposes of religious worship was
forbidden; the Christian churches were to be demolished to their foundations; all
manuscripts of the Bible should be burned; those who held places of honour or
rank must either renounce their faith or be degraded; in judicial proceedings
the torture might be used against all Christians, of whatever rank; those
belonging to the lower walks of private life were to be divested of their
rights as citizens and as freemen; Christian slaves were to be incapable of
receiving their freedom, so long as they remained Christians."‹Neander, Hist.
of the Church, Torrey's Trans. i. 148. This persecution was the last against
the Christians by the Roman emperors; the last that was waged by that mighty
Pagan power. Diocletian soon resigned the purple, and after the persecution had
continued to rage, with more or less severity, under his successors, for ten
years, the peace of the church was established. "Diocletian," says Mr. Gibbon,
(i. 322,) "had no sooner published his edicts against the Christians, than, as
if he had been committing to other hands his work of persecution, he divested
himself of the imperial purple. The character and situation of his colleagues
and successors sometimes urged them to enforce, and sometimes to suspend, the
execution of these rigorous laws; nor can we acquire a just and distinct idea
of this important period of ecclesiastical history, unless we separately
consider the state of Christianity in the different parts of the empire, during
the space of ten years which elapsed between the first edicts of Diocletian and
the final peace of the church."
For
this detail, consult Gibbon, i. 322-329, and the authorities there referred to;
and Neander, Hist. of the Church, i. 147-156. Respecting the details of the
persecution, Mr. Gibbon remarks, (i. 326,) "It would have been an easy task,
from the history of Eusebius, from the declaration of Lactantius, and from the
most ancient acts, to collect a long series of horrid and disgustful pictures,
and to fill many pages with racks and scourges, with iron-hooks, and red-hot
beds, and with the variety of tortures which fire and steel, savage beasts, and
more savage executioners, could inflict on the human body." It is true that Mr.
Gibbon professes to doubt the truth of these records, and attempts to show that
the account of the number of the martyrs has been greatly exaggerated; yet no
one, in reading his own account of this persecution, can doubt that it was the
result of a determined effort to blot out the Christian religion, and that the
whole of the imperial power was exerted to accomplish this end. At length, the
last of the imperial persecutions ceased, and the great truth was demonstrated
that Christianity could not be extinguished by power, and that "the gates of
hell could not prevail against it." "In the year 311," says Neander, (i. 156,)
"the remarkable edict appeared which put an end to the last sanguinary conflict
of the Christian church and the Roman empire." This decree was issued by the
author and instigator of the persecution, Galerius, who, "softened by a severe
and painful disease, the consequence of his excesses, had been led to think
that the God of the Christians might, after all, be a powerful being, whose
anger punished him, and whose favour he must endeavour to conciliate." This man
suspended the persecution, and gave the Christians permission "once more to
hold their assemblies, provided they did nothing contrary to the good order of
the Roman state." "Ita ut ne quid contra disciplinam agant."‹Neander, ibid.
10. See Note on Rev. 6:9
11. See Note on Rev. 6:9
12. And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal.
See Note on Rev. 5:1.
And,
lo, there was a great earthquake. Before endeavouring to ascertain
to what the sixth seal was designed to refer, it is proper, as in the previous
cases, to furnish a particular explanation of the meaning of the symbols. See
Note on Rev. 6:13, seq. All the symbols represented in the opening of this seal
denote consternation, commotion, changes; but still they are all significant,
and we are to suppose that something would occur corresponding with each one of
them. It cannot be supposed that the things here described were represented on
the part of the roll or volume that was now unfolded in any other way than that
they were pictures, or that the whole was a species of panoramic representation
made to pass before the eyes. Thus understood, it would not be difficult to
represent each one of these things in a painting: as the heaving ground‹the
agitated forests‹the trembling hills‹the falling cities and houses‹the sun
blackened, and the moon turned to blood.
(a)
The earthquake: There was a great earthquake. Rev. 6:12.
The word here used denotes a shaking or agitation of the earth. The effect,
when violent, is to produce important changes‹opening chasms in the earth;
throwing down houses and temples; sinking hills, and elevating plains; causing ponds
and lakes to dry up, or forming them where none existed; elevating the ocean
from its bed, rending rocks, etc. As all that occurs in the opening of the
other seals is symbolical, it is to be presumed that this is also, and that for
the fulfilment of this we are not to look for a literal earthquake, but for
such agitations and changes in the world as would be properly symbolized by
this. The earthquake, as a symbol, would merely denote great agitations or
overturnings on the earth. The particular character of those changes must be
determined by other circumstances in the symbol that would limit and explain
it. There are, it is said, but three literal earthquakes referred to in the
Scripture: that mentioned in 1 Kings 19:11; that in Uzziah's time, Amos 1:1;
Zech. 14:5. and that which took place at the Saviour's death. All the rest are
emblematical or symbolical‹referring mostly to civil commotions and changes.
Then in Hag. 2:6-7: "Yet once, it is a little while, and I will shake the
heavens and the earth, and the sea, and the dry land, and I will shake all
nations, and the desire of all nations shall come; and I will fill this house
with glory, saith the Lord of hosts." That is, there would be great agitations
in the world before he came. See Note on Heb. 12:26-28.
So
also great changes and commotions are referred to in Isa. 24:19-20: "The earth
is utterly broken down, the earth is clean dissolved, the earth is moved
exceedingly. The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be
removed like a cottage." An earthquake, if there were no other
circumstances limiting and explaining the symbol, would merely denote great
agitation and commotion‹as if states and empires were tumbling to
ruin. As this is here a mere symbol, it is not necessary to look for a
literal fulfilment, or to expect to find in history actual earthquakes to which
this had reference, any more than when it is said that "the heavens departed as
a scroll" we are to expect that they will be literally rolled up; but if, in
the course of history, earthquakes preceded remarkable political convulsions
and revolutions, it would be proper to represent such events in this way.
The
darkening of the sun: And the sun became black as sackcloth of hair. Sackcloth
was a coarse black cloth, commonly, though not always, made of hair. It was
used for sacks, for strainers, and for mourning garments; and as thus worn it
was not an improper emblem of sadness and distress. The idea here is, that the
sun put on a dark, dingy, doleful appearance, as if it were in
mourning. The general image, then, in this emblem, is that of calamity‹as if the very
sun should put on the robes of mourning. We are by no means to suppose that
this was literally to occur, but that some great calamity would happen of
which this would be an appropriate emblem. See Notes on Isa. 13:10, Matt.
24:29.
Compare
Isa. 24:23; 34:4. Isa. 50:3; 60:19-20; Ezek. 32:7-8; Joel 2:10; 3:15-16
Amos
8:9. What is the particular nature of the calamity is to be learned from other
parts of the symbol.
The
discolouration of the moon: And the moon became as blood. Red like
blood‹either from the smoke and vapour that usually precedes an earthquake, or
as a mere emblem. This also would betoken calamity, and perhaps the symbol
may be so far limited and modified by this as to denote war, for that
would be most naturally suggested by the colour‹red. See Note
on Rev. 6:4.
But
any great calamity would be appropriately represented by this‹as the
change of the moon to such a colour would be a natural emblem of distress.
See
also:
See Note on Rev. 6:13, seq.
13. The falling of the stars: And the stars of heaven fell unto the
earth. This language is derived from the poetic idea
that the sky seems to be a solid concave in which the stars are set, and that,
when any convulsion takes place, that concave will be shaken, and the stars
will be loosened and fall from their places. See this language explained in See
Note on Isa. 34:4.
Sometimes
the expanse above us is spoken of as a curtain that is spread out and that may be
rolled up; sometimes as a solid crystalline expanse in which the stars are
fixed. According to either representation, the stars are described as falling
to the earth. If the expanse is rolled up, the stars, having nothing
to support them, fall; if violent tempests or concussions shake the heavens,
the stars, loosened from their fixtures, fall to the earth. Stars, in the
Scriptures, are symbols of princes and rulers, (see Dan. 8:10; Rev. 8:10-11;
9:1) and the natural meaning of this symbol is, that there would be commotions
which would unsettle princes, and bring them down from their thrones‹like stars
falling from the sky.
Even
as a fig-tree casteth her untimely figs. Marg., green; Gr., olunqouß. This word
properly denotes winter-figs, or such as grow under the leaves,
and do not ripen at the proper season, but hang upon the trees during the
winter.‹Rob. Lex. This fruit seldom matures, and easily falls off in the spring of
the year.‹Stuart, in loc. A violent wind shaking a plantation of
fig-trees would of course cast many such figs to the ground. The point of the
comparison is, the ease with which the stars would seem to be shaken from their
places, and hence the ease with which, in these commotions, princes would be
dethroned.
See
also:
See Note on Rev. 6:14, seq.
14. The departing of the heavens: And the heaven departed as a
scroll. That is, as a book or volume‹biblion‹rolled up. The heavens are here
described as spread out, and their passing away is represented by the idea that
they might be rolled up, and thus disappear. See See Note on Isa. 34:4.
This
too is a symbol, and we are not to suppose that it will literally occur.
Indeed, it never can literally occur; and we are not, therefore, to
look for the fulfilment of this in any physical fact that would correspond with
what is here said. The plain meaning is, that there would be changes as if such an
event would happen; that is, that revolutions would occur in the high places of
the earth, and among those in power, as if the stars should fall, and
the very heavens were swept away. This is the natural meaning of the symbol,
and this accords with the usage of the language elsewhere.
The
removal of mountains and islands: And every mountain and island were
moved out of their places. This would denote convulsions in the political
or moral world, as great as would occur in the physical world if the very
mountains were removed, and the islands should change their places. We are not
to suppose that this would literally occur, but we should be authorized from this
to expect that, in regard to those things which seemed to be permanent and
fixed on an immovable basis, like mountains and islands, there would be violent
and important changes. If thrones and dynasties long established were
overthrown; if institutions that seemed to be fixed and permanent were
abolished; if a new order of things should rise in the political world, the
meaning of the symbol, so far as the language is concerned, would be fulfilled.
15. The universal consternation: And the kings of the earth, etc. The
design of this and the following verses, (Rev. 6:15-17) in the varied language
used, is evidently to denote universal consternation and alarm‹as if the earth
should be convulsed, and the stars should fall, and the heavens should pass
away. This consternation would extend to all classes of men, and fill the world
with alarm, as if the end of all things were coming.
The
kings of the earth. Rulers‹all who occupied thrones.
The
great men. High officers of state.
And
the rich men. Their wealth would not secure them from destruction, and they
would be alarmed like others.
And
the chief captains. The commanders of armies, who tremble like other men when God
appears in judgment.
And
the mighty men. Men of great prowess in battle, but who feel now that they have
no power to withstand God.
And
every bondman. Servant‹douloß. This word does not necessarily denote a slave, compare
Notes on Eph. 6:5; 1 Tim. 6:1; 1 Tim. 1:16, but here the connexion seems to
demand it, for it stands in contrast with freeman. There
were, in fact, slaves in the Roman empire, and there is no objection in
supposing that they are here referred to. There is no reason why they should
not be filled with consternation as well as others; and as this does not refer
to the end of the world, or the day of judgment, the word here determines
nothing as to the question whether slavery is to continue on the earth.
And
every freeman. Whether the master of slaves or not. The idea is, that all
classes of men, high and low, would be filled with alarm.
Hid
themselves in the dens. Among the caves or caverns in the mountains.
See See Note on Isa. 2:19.
These
places were resorted to for safety in times of danger. Compare 1 Sam. 13:6; 1
Sam. 24; Judg. 6:2; Jer. 41:9, and Jos. Ant. book xiv chapter xv, Jewish Wars,
book i chapter 16.
And
in the rocks of the mountains. Among the crags or the fastnesses
of the mountains‹also natural places of refuge in times of hostile invasion or
danger. See Note on Isa. 2:21.
See
also:
See Note on Rev. 6:16, seq.
16. And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, etc.. This
language is found substantially in Hos. 10:8: "And they shall say to the
mountains, Cover us; and to the hills, Fall on us." It is also used by the
Saviour as denoting the consternation which would occur at his coming: "Then
shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover
us," Luke 23:30. It is language denoting consternation, and an awful fear of
impending wrath. The state of mind is that where there is an apprehension that
God himself is coming forth with the direct instruments of his vengeance, and
where there is a desire rather to be crushed by falling rocks and hills than by
the vengeance of his uplifted arm.
From
the face of him that sitteth on the throne. The face of God‹for he
seems to be coming forth with the displays of his vengeance. It is not said
that God would actually come forth in a visible form, but their consternation
would be as great as if he were to do this; the state of mind indicated by this
was an apprehension that it would be so.
And
from the wrath of the Lamb. The Lamb of God; the Lord Jesus. See Note on
Rev. 5:6.
There
seems to be an incongruity between the words wrath and Lamb; but the
word Lamb here is so far a proper name as to be used only to designate the
Redeemer. He comes forth to execute wrath, not as a Lamb, but as the Son of
God, who bore that name. It would seem from this that they who thus dreaded the
impending terrors were aware of their source, or had knowledge enough to
understand by whom they were to be inflicted. They would see that these were Divine judgments,
and would apprehend that the end of the world drew near.
17. For the great day of his wrath is come. The
threatening judgments would be so severe and awful that they would suppose that
the end of the world was coming.
And
who shall be able to stand? To stand before him, or to withstand his
judgments.
Chapter 7
Analysis of the Chapter
THE state of things represented in this chapter is, that where
there had been awful consternation and alarm, as if the end of the world were
coming, and where the signs of the approaching consummation of all things are,
as it were, held back until there should be an opportunity of sealing the
number that was to be saved. This is symbolized by four angels standing in the
four quarters of the earth, and holding the winds and the storms that they
should not blow on the earth, until the servants of God should be sealed in
their foreheads. The idea is that of sudden destruction about to burst on the
world, which, if unrestrained, would apparently bring on the consummation of
all things, but which is held back until the purposes of God in regard to his
people shall be accomplished‹that is, until those who are the true servants of
God shall be designated by some appropriate mark. This furnishes an opportunity
of disclosing a glorious vision of those who will be saved, alike among the
Jews and the Gentiles. The fact, as seen in the symbol, is, that the end of the
world does not come at the opening of the sixth seal, as it seemed as if it
would, and as it was anticipated in the time of the consternation. The number
of the chosen was not complete, and the impending wrath was therefore
suspended. God interposes in favour of his people, and discloses in vision a
vast number from all lands who will yet be saved, and the winds and storms are
held back as if by angels.
The
points, then, that are apparent in this chapter, without any reference now to
the question of the application, are the following:
(1.)
The impending ruin that seemed about to spread over the earth, apparently
bringing on the consummation of all things, restrained or suspended, Rev. 7:1.
This impending ruin is symbolized by the four winds of heaven that seemed about
to sweep over the world; the interposition of God is represented by the four
angels who have power over those winds to hold them back, as if it depended on
their will to let them loose and to spread ruin over the earth or not.
(2.)
A suspension of these desolating influences and agents until another important
purpose could be accomplished‹that is, until the servants of God could be
sealed in their foreheads, Rev. 7:2, 3. Another angel, acting independently of
the four first seen, and having power to command, appears in the east, having
the seal of the living God; and he directs the four angels, having the four
winds, not to let them loose upon the earth until the servants of God should be
sealed in their foreheads. This obviously denotes some suspension of the
impending wrath, and for a specific purpose, that something might be done by
which the true servants of God would be so marked as to be publicly known‹as if
they had a mark or brand to that effect imprinted on their foreheads. Whatever
would serve to designate them, to determine who they were, to ascertain their
number, would be a fulfilment of this act of the sealing angel. The length of
time during which it would be done is not designated; the essential thing is,
that there would be a suspension of impending judgments in order that it might
be done. Whether this was to occupy a longer or a shorter period is not
determined by the symbol; nor is it determined when the winds thus held back
would be suffered to blow.
(3.)
The number of the sealed, Rev. 7:4-8. The seer does not represent himself as
actually beholding the process of sealing, but he says that he heard the number
of those who were sealed. That number was an hundred and forty-four thousand,
and they were selected from the twelve tribes of the children of Israel‹Levi
being reckoned, who was not usually numbered with the tribes, and the tribe of
Dan being omitted. The number from each tribe, large or small, was the same;
the entire portion selected being but a very small part of the whole. The
general idea here, whatever may be the particular application, is, that there
would be a selection, and that the whole number of the tribe would not be
embraced; that the selection would be made from each tribe, and that all would
have the same mark and be saved by the same means. It would not be in
accordance with the nature of symbolic representation to suppose that the saved
would be the precise number here referred to; but some great truth is designed
to be represented by this fact. We should look, in the fulfilment, to some
process by which the true servants of God would be designated; we should expect
that a portion of them would be found in each one of the classes here denoted
by a tribe; we should suppose that the true servants of God thus referred to
would be as safe in the times of peril as if they were designated by a visible
mark.
(4.)
After this, another vision presents itself to the seer. It is that of a
countless multitude before the throne, redeemed out of all nations, with palms
in their hands, Rev. 7:9-17. The scene is transferred to heaven, and there is a
vision of all the redeemed‹not only of the hundred and forty-four thousand, but
of all who would be rescued and saved from a lost world. The design is
doubtless to cheer the hearts of the true friends of God in times of gloom and
despondency, by a view of the great numbers that will be saved, and the
glorious triumph that awaits the redeemed in heaven. This portion of the vision
embraces the following particulars:
(a)
A vast multitude, which no man can number, is seen before the throne in heaven.
They are clad in white robes‹emblems of purity; they have palms in their
hands‹emblems of victory, Rev 7:9.
(b)
They are engaged in ascribing praise to God, Rev. 7:10.
(c)
The angels, the elders, and the four living creatures, fall down before the
throne, and unite with the redeemed in ascriptions of praise, Rev. 7:11, 12.
(d)
A particular inquiry is made of the seer‹evidently to call his attention to
it‹respecting those who appear there in white robes, Rev. 7:13.
(e)
To this inquiry it is answered that they were those who had come up out of
great tribulation, and who had washed their robes, and had made them pure in
the blood of the Lamb, Rev. 7:14.
(f)
Then follows a description of their condition and employment in heaven, Rev.
7:15-17. They are constantly before the throne; they serve God continually;
they neither hunger nor thirst; they are not subjected to the burning heat of
the sun; they are provided for by the Lamb in the midst of the throne; and all
tears are for ever wiped away from their eyes.‹This must be regarded, I think,
as an episode, having no immediate connexion with what precedes or with what
follows. It seems to be thrown in here‹while the impending judgments of the
sixth seal are suspended, and before the seventh is opened‹to furnish a relief
in the contemplation of so many scenes of woe, and to cheer the soul with
inspiring hopes from the view of the great number that would ultimately be
saved. While these judgments, therefore, are suspended, the mind is directed on
to the world of triumph, as a view fitted to sustain and comfort those who
would be partakers in the scenes of woe. At the same time it is one of the most
touching and beautiful of all the representations of heaven ever penned, and is
eminently adapted to comfort those, in all ages, who are in a vale of tears.
In
the exposition, it will be proper (Rev. 7:1-8) to inquire into the fair meaning
of the language employed in the symbols; and then to inquire whether there are
any known facts to which the description is applicable. The first inquiry may
and should be pursued independently of the other; and, it may be added, that
the explanation offered on this may be correct, even if the other should be
erroneous. The same remark, also, is applicable to the remainder of the
chapter, (Rev. 7:9-17,) and indeed is of general applicability in the
exposition of this book.
1. And after these things. After the vision of the things
referred to in the opening of the sixth seal. The natural interpretation would
be, that what is here said of the angels and the winds occurred after those
things which are described in the previous chapter. The exact chronology may
not be always observed in these symbolical representations, but doubtless there
is a general order which is observed.
I
saw four angels. He does not describe their forms, but merely mentions their
agency. This is, of course, a symbolical representation. We are not to suppose
that it would be literally fulfilled, or that, at the time
referred to by the vision, four celestial beings would be stationed in the four
quarters of the world, for the purpose of checking and restraining the winds
that blow from the four points of the compass. The meaning is, that events
would occur which would be properly represented by four
angels standing in the four quarters of the world, and having power over the
winds.
Standing
on the four corners of the earth. This language is, of course,
accommodated to the prevailing mode of speaking of the earth among the Hebrews.
It was a common method among them to describe it as a vast plain, having four
corners, those corners being the prominent points‹north, south, east, and west.
So we speak now of the four winds, the four quarters of the world, etc. The
Hebrews spoke of the earth, as we do of the rising and setting of the sun, and
of the motions of the heavenly bodies, according to appearances, and without
aiming at philosophical exactness. Compare Note on Job 26:7.
With
this view they spoke of the earth as an extended plain, and as having
boundaries or corners, as a plain or field naturally has. Perhaps also they
used this language with some allusion to an edifice, as having four corners;
for they speak also of the earth as having foundations. The
language which the Hebrews used was in accordance with the prevailing ideas and
language of the ancients on the subject.
Holding
the four winds of the earth. The winds blow in fact from every quarter, but
it is convenient to speak of them as coming from the four principal points of
the compass, and this method is adopted, probably, in every language. So among
the Greeks and Latins, the winds were arranged under four classes‹Zephyrus,
Boreas, Notus, and Eurus‹considered as under the control of a king, AEolus. See
Esehenburg, Man. Class. Lit. % 78, comp. % 108. The angels here are represented
as "holding" the winds‹kratountaß. That is, they held them back when about to sweep over the earth,
and to produce far- spread desolation. This is an allusion to a popular belief
among the Hebrews, that the agency of the angels was employed everywhere. It is
not suggested that the angels had raised the tempest here, but only
that they now restrained and controlled it. The essential idea is, that they
had power over those winds, and that they were now exercising that power by
keeping them back when they were about to spread desolation over the earth.
That
the wind should not blow on the earth. That there should be a calm, as
if the winds were held back.
Nor
on the sea. Nowhere‹neither on sea nor land. The sea and the land constitute
the surface of the globe, and the language here, therefore, denotes that there
would be a universal calm. Nor on any tree. To injure it. The language here used
is such as would denote a state of profound quiet; as when we say that it is so
still that not a leaf of the trees moves.
In
regard to the literal meaning of the symbol here employed there can be no great
difficulty; as to its application there may be more. The winds are the proper
symbols of wars and commotions. Compare Dan. 8:2. In Jer. 49:36-37, the symbol
is both used and explained: "And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the
four quarters of heaven, and will scatter them toward all those winds; and
there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come. For I
will cause Elam to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek
their life." So in Jer. 51:1-2, a destroying wind is an emblem of destructive
war: "I will raise up against Babylon a destroying wind, and will send unto Babylon
farmers, that shall fan her, and shall empty her land." Compare Horace, Odes,
b, i. 14. The essential ideas, therefore, in this portion of the symbol, cannot
be mistaken. They are two:
(1)
that at the period of time here referred to‹after the opening of the sixth seal
and before the opening of the seventh‹there would be a state of things which
would be well represented by rising tempests and storms, which if unrestrained
would spread desolation afar; and
(2)
that this impending ruin was held back as if by angels having control of those
winds; that is, those tempests were not suffered to go forth to spread
desolation over the world. A suspended tempest; calamity held in check; armies
hovering on the borders of a kingdom, but not allowed to proceed for a time;
hordes of invaders detained, or stayed in their march, as if by some
restraining power not their own, and from causes not within themselves‹any of
these things would be an obvious fulfilling of the meaning of the symbol.
2. And I saw another angel. Evidently having no
connexion with the four, and employed for another purpose. This angel,
also, must have been symbolic; and all that is implied is, that something would
be done as if an angel had done it.
Ascending
from the east. He appeared in the east, and seemed to rise like the sun. It is
not easy to determine what is the special significancy, if any, of the east here, or
why this quarter of the heavens is designated rather than the north, the south,
or the west. It may be that as light begins in the east, this would be properly
symbolic of something that could be compared with the light of the morning; or
that some influence in "sealing" the servants of God would in fact go out from
the east; or perhaps no special significance is to be attached to the quarter
from which the angel is seen to come. It is not necessary to suppose that every
minute thing in a symbol is to receive a complete fulfilment, or that there
will be some particular thing to correspond with it. Perhaps all that is meant
here is, that as the sun comes forth with splendour from the east, so the angel
came with magnificence to perform a task‹that of sealing the servants of
God‹cheerful and joyous like that which the sun performs. It is certain that
from no other quarter of the heavens would it be so appropriate to represent an
angel as coming forth to perform a purpose of light and mercy and salvation. It
does not seem to me, therefore, that we are to look, in the fulfilment of this,
for any special influence setting in from the east as that
which is symbolized here.
Having
the seal of the living God. Bearing it in his hands. In regard to this
seal the following remarks may be made:
(a)
The phrase "seal of the living God" doubtless means that which God had
appointed, or which he would use; that is, if God himself came forth in this
manner, he would use this seal for these purposes. Men often have a seal of
their own, with some name, symbol, or device, which designates it as theirs,
and which no other one has a right to use. A seal is sometimes used by the
person himself; sometimes entrusted to a high officer of state; sometimes to
the secretary of a corporation; and sometimes, as a mark of special favour, to
a friend. In this case it was entrusted to an angel who was authorized to use
it, and whose use of it would be sanctioned, of course, wherever he applied it,
by the living God, as if he had employed it himself.
(b)
As to the form of the seal, we have no information. It would be most natural to
suppose that the name "of the living God" would be engraven on it, so
that that name would appear on any one to whom it might be affixed. Compare
Note on 2 Tim. 2:19.
It
was customary in the East to brand the name of the master on the forehead of a
slave, (Grotius, in loc.;) and such an idea would meet all that is
implied in the language here, though there is no certain evidence that
there is an allusion to that custom. In subsequent times, in the church, it was
common for Christians to impress the sign of the cross on their
foreheads.‹Tertullian de Corona; Cyrill. lib. vi. See Grotius. As nothing is
said here, however, about any mark or device on the seal, conjecture is useless
as to what it was.
(c)
As to what was to be designated by the seal, the main idea is clear, that it
was to place some such mark upon his friends that they would be known to be
his, and that they would be safe in the impending calamities. There is perhaps
allusion here to Ezek. 9:4-6, where the following direction to the prophet
occurs: "Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and
set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh, and that cry, for all the
abominations that be done in the midst thereof. And to the others he said in
mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite; let not your eye
spare, neither have ye pity: slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little
children, and women; but come not near any man upon whom is the mark." The
essential ideas in the sealing, in the passage before us, would
therefore seem to be,
(1.)
that there would be some mark, sign, or token, by which they who were the
people of God would be known; that is, there would be something which would
answer, in this respect, the same purpose as if a seal had
been impressed upon their foreheads. Whether this was an outward badge, or a
religious rite, or the doctrines which they would hold and by which they would
be known, or something in their spirit and manner which would characterize his
true disciples, may be a fair subject of inquiry. It is not specifically
designated by the use of the word.
(2.)
It would be something that would be conspicuous or prominent, as if it were
impressed on the forehead. It would not be merely some internal sealing, or
some designation by which they would be known to themselves and to God, but it
would be something apparent, as if engraved on the forehead.
What this would be, whether a profession, or a form of religion, or the holding
of some doctrine, or the manifestation of a particular spirit, is not here
designated.
(3.)
This would be something appointed by God himself. It would not be of human
origin, but would be as if an angel sent from heaven should
impress it on the forehead. If it refers to the doctrines which they would
hold, they could not be doctrines of human origin; if to the spirit which they
would manifest, it would be a spirit of heavenly origin; if to some outward
protection, it would be manifest that it was from God.
(4.)
This would be a pledge of safety. The design of sealing the persons referred to
seems to have been to secure their safety in the impending calamities. Thus the
winds were held back until those who were to be sealed could be designated, and
then they were to be allowed to sweep over the earth. These things, therefore,
we are to look for in the fulfilment of the symbol.
And
he cried with a loud voice. As if he had authority to command, and as if
the four winds were about to be let forth upon the world.
To
whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea. Who had
power committed to them to do this by means of the four winds.
3. Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, etc. Let
the winds be restrained until what is here designated shall be done. These
destroying angels were commanded to suspend the work of destruction Until the
servants of God could be rendered secure. The division here, as in Rev. 7:1, of
the "earth, the sea, and the trees," seems to include everything‹water, land,
and the productions of the earth. Nothing was to be injured until the angel
should designate the true servants of God.
Till
we have sealed the servants of our God. The use of the plural "we" seems to
denote that he did not expect to do it alone. Who were to be associated With
him, whether angels or men, he does not intimate; but the work was evidently
such that it demanded the agency of more than one.
In
their foreheads. See Note on Rev. 7:2; compare Ezek. 9:4-5. A mark thus placed on
the forehead would be conspicuous, and would be something which could at once
be recognised if destruction should spread over the world. The fulfilment of
this is to be found in two things:
(a)
in something which would be conspicuous or prominent‹so that it could be seen;
and
(b)
in the mark being of such a nature or character that it would be a proper
designation of the fact that they were the true servants of God.
4. And I heard the number of them which were sealed. He does
not say where he heard that, or by whom it was communicated to him,
or when it was done. The material point is, that he heard it; he did
not see it done. Either by the angel, or by some direct communication
from God, he was told of the number that would be sealed, and of the
distribution of the whole number into twelve equal parts, represented by the
tribes of the children of Israel.
And
there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand
of all the tribes of the children of Israel. In regard to this number,
the first and the main question is, whether it is meant that this was to be the
literal number, or whether it was symbolical; and, if
the latter, of what it is a symbol.
I.
As to the first of these inquiries, there does not appear to be any good reason
for doubt. The fair interpretation seems to require that it should be
understood as symbolical, or as designed not to be literally taken; for
(a)
the whole scene is symbolical‹the winds, the angels, the sealing.
(b)
It cannot be supposed that this number will include all who will be
sealed and saved. In whatever way this is interpreted, and whatever we may
suppose it to refer to, we cannot but suppose that more than this number will
be saved.
(c)
The number is too exact and artificial to suppose that it is literal. It is
inconceivable that exactly the same number‹precisely twelve thousand‹should be
selected from each tribe of the children of Israel.
(d)
If literal, it is necessary to suppose that this refers to the twelve tribes of
the children of Israel. But on every supposition this is absurd. Ten of their
tribes had been long before carried away, and the distinction of the tribes was
lost, no more to be recovered, and the Hebrew people never have been, since the
time of John, in circumstances to which the description here could be
applicable. These considerations make it clear that the description here is
symbolical. But,
II.
Of what is it symbolical? Is it of a large number, or of a small number?
Is it of those who would be saved from among the Jews, or of all who would be
saved in the Christian church‹represented as the "tribes of the children of
Israel?" To these inquiries we may answer,
(1.)
that the representation seems to be rather that of a comparatively small number than
a large one, for these reasons:
(a)
The number of itself is not large.
(b)
The number is not large as compared with those who must have
constituted the tribes here referred to‹the number twelve thousand, for
example, as compared with the whole number of the tribe of Judah, of the tribe
of Reuben, etc.
(c)
It would seem from the language that there would be some selection from a much
greater number. Thus, not all in the tribes were sealed, but
those who were sealed were "of all the tribes"‹ek pashß fulhß; that is, out
of these tribes. So in the specification in each tribe‹ek fulhß iouda, roubhn, etc. Some out
of the tribe, to wit, twelve thousand, were sealed. It is not said
of the twelve thousand of the tribes of Judah, Reuben, etc., that they constituted the tribe,
but that they were sealed out of the tribe, as a part of it
preserved and saved. "When the preposition ek, or out of, stands
after any such verb as sealed, between a definite numeral and a
noun of multitude in the genitive, sound criticism requires, doubtless, that
the numeral should be thus construed, as signifying, not the whole, but a part
taken out."‹Elliott, i. 237. Compare Exod. 32:28; Numb. 1:21; 1 Sam. 4:10.
The
phrase, then, would properly denote those taken out of some other
and greater number‹as a portion of a tribe, and not the whole tribe. If the
reference here is to the church, it would seem to denote that a portion only of
that church would be sealed.
(d)
For the same reason the idea would seem to be, that comparatively a small portion is
referred to‹as twelve thousand would be comparatively a small part of one of
the tribes of Israel; and if this refers to the church, we should expect to
find its fulfilment in a state of things in which the largest proportion would not be sealed:
that is, in a corrupt state of the church in which there would be many
professors of religion, but comparatively few who had real piety.
(2.)
To the other inquiry‹whether this refers to those who would be sealed and saved
among the Jews, or to those in the Christian church‹we may answer,
(a)
that there are strong reasons for supposing the latter to be the correct
opinion. Long before the time of John all these distinctions of tribe were
abolished. The ten tribes had been carried away and scattered in distant lands,
never more to be restored; and it cannot be supposed that there was any such literal selection
from the twelve tribes as is here spoken of, or any such designation of twelve
thousand from each. There was no occasion‹either when Jerusalem was destroyed,
or at any other time‹on which there were such transactions as are here referred
to occurring in reference to the children of Israel.
(b)
The language is such as a Christian, who had been by birth and education a
Hebrew, would naturally use if he wished to designate the church. Compare Note
on James 1:1.
1.
Accustomed to speak of the people of God as "the twelve tribes of Israel,"
nothing was more natural than to transfer this language to the church of the
Redeemer, and to speak of it in that figurative manner. Accordingly, from the
necessity of the case, the language is universally understood to have reference
to the Christian church. Even Professor Stuart, who supposes that the reference
is to the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, interprets it of
the preservation of Christians, and their flight to Pella, beyond Jordan. Thus
interpreted, moreover, it accords with the entire symbolical character of the
representation.
(c)
The reference to the particular tribes may be a designed allusion
to the Christian church as it would be divided into denominations, or known by
different names; and the fact that a certain portion would be sealed from every
tribe would not be an unfit representation of the fact that a portion of all
the various churches or denominations would be sealed and saved. That is,
salvation would be confined to no one church or denomination, but among them
all there would be found true servants of God. It would be improper to suppose
that the division into tribes among the children of Israel was designed to be a
type of the sects and denominations in the Christian church, and yet
the fact of such a division may not improperly be employed as an illustration of that;
for the whole church is made up not of any one denomination alone, but of all
who hold the truth combined, as the people of God in ancient times consisted
not solely of any one tribe, however large and powerful, but of all combined.
Thus understood, the symbol would point to a time when there would be various
denominations in the church, and yet with the idea that true friends of God
would be found among them all.
(d)
Perhaps nothing can be argued from the fact that exactly twelve thousand were
selected from each of the tribes. In language so figurative and symbolical as
this, it could not be maintained that this proves that the same definite number
would be taken from each denomination of Christians. Perhaps all that can be fairly inferred
is, that there would be no partiality or preference for one more than another;
that there would be no favouritism on account of the tribe or denomination to
which any one belonged; but that the seal would be impressed on all, of any
denomination, who had the true spirit of religion. No one would receive the
token of the Divine favour because he was of the tribe of Judah or
Reuben; no one because he belonged to any particular denomination of
Christians. Large numbers from every branch of the church would be sealed; none
would be sealed because he belonged to one form of external organization rather
than to another; none would be excluded because he belonged to any one tribe,
if he had the spirit and held the sentiments which made it proper to recognise
him as a servant of God. These views seem to me to express the true sense of
this passage. No one can seriously maintain that the writer meant to refer
literally to the Jewish people; and if he referred to the Christian church, it
seems to be to some selection that would be made out of the whole church, in
which there would be no favouritism or partiality, and to the fact that, in
regard to them, there would be something which, in the midst of abounding
corruption or impending danger, would designate them as the chosen people of
God, and would furnish evidence that they would be safe.
5-8. Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. That is, a
selection was made, or a number sealed, as if it had been
made from one of the tribes of the children of Israel‹the tribe of Judah. If
the remarks above made are correct, this refers to the Christian church, and
means, in connexion with what follows, that each portion of the church would
furnish a definite part of the whole number sealed and saved. We are not required
to understand this of the exact number of twelve thousand, but that the
designation would be made from all parts and branches of the church as if a selection
of the true servants of God were made from the whole number of the tribes of
Israel. There seems to be no particular reason why the tribe of Judah was
mentioned first. Judah was not the oldest of the sons of Jacob, and there was
no settled order in which the tribes were usually mentioned. The order of their
birth, as mentioned in Gen. 29:1; 30:1, is as follows: Reuben, Simeon, Levi,
Judah, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph, Benjamin. In the
blessing of Jacob, Gen. 49:1, this order is changed, and is as follows: Reuben,
Simeon, Levi, Judah, Zebulun, Issachar, Dan, Gad, Asher, Naphtali, Joseph,
Benjamin. In the blessing of Moses, Deut. 33:1, a different order still is
observed: Reuben, Judah, Levi, Benjamin, Joseph, Zebulun, Issachar, Gad, Dan,
Naphtali, Asher; and in this last, moreover, Simeon is omitted. So again in
Ezek. 48:1, there are two enumerations of the twelve tribes, differing from
each other, and both differing from the arrangements above referred to: viz.,
in Ezek. 48:31-34, where Levi is reckoned as one, and Joseph as only one; and
in Ezek. 48:1-27, referring to the division of the country, where Levi, who had
no heritage in land, is omitted, and Ephraim and Manasseh are counted as two
tribes.‹Professor Stuart, ii. 172, 173. From facts like these, it is clear that
there was no certain and settled order in which the tribes were mentioned by
the sacred writers. The same thing seems to have occurred in the enumeration of
the tribes which would occur, for example, in the enumeration of the several
States of the American Union. There is indeed an order which is usually observed,
beginning with Maine, etc., but almost no two writers would observe throughout
the same order; nor should we deem it strange if the order should be materially
varied by even the same writer in enumerating them at different times, thus, at
one time, it might be convenient to enumerate them according to their
geographical position; at another, in the order of their settlement; at
another, in the order of their admission into the Union; at another, in the
order of their size and importance; at another, in the order in which they are
arranged in reference to political parties, etc. Something of the same kind may
have occurred in the order in which the tribes were mentioned among the Jews. Perhaps this may
have occurred also of design, in order that no one tribe might claim the
precedence or the pre-eminence by being always placed at the head of the list.
If, as is supposed above, the allusion in this enumeration of the tribes was to
the various portions of the Christian church, then perhaps the idea intended to
be conveyed is, that no one division of that church is to have any preference
on account of its locality, or its occupying any particular country, or because
it has more wealth, learning, or numbers than others; but that all are to be
regarded, where there is the true spirit of religion, as on a level.
There
are, however, three peculiarities in this enumeration of the tribes which
demand a more particular explanation. The number indeed is twelve, but that
number is made up in a peculiar manner.
(1.)
Joseph is mentioned, and also Manasseh. The matter
of fact was, that Joseph had two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, (Gen. 48:1) and
that these two sons gave name to two of the tribes, the tribes of Ephraim and
Manasseh. There was, properly speaking, no tribe of the name Joseph. In Numb.
13:1 the name Levi is omitted, as it usually is, because that tribe had no
inheritance in the division of the land; and in order that the number twelve
might be complete, Ephraim and Joseph are mentioned as two tribes,
Rev. 7:8, 11. In verse 11, the writer states expressly that by the tribe Joseph
he meant Manasseh‹"Of the tribe of Joseph, namely, of the
tribe of Manasseh," etc. From this it would seem that, as Manasseh was the
oldest, (Gen. 48:14) the name Joseph was sometimes given to that tribe.
As Ephraim, however, became the largest tribe, and as Jacob in blessing the two
sons of Joseph (Gen. 48:14) laid his right hand on Ephraim, and pronounced a
special blessing on him, (Gen. 48:19-20) it would seem not improbable that, when
not particularly designated, the name Joseph was given
to that tribe, as it is evidently in this place. Possibly the name Joseph may have
been a general name which was occasionally applied to either of these
tribes. In the long account of the original division of Canaan, in Joshua
13-19, Levi is omitted, because he had no heritage, and Ephraim and Manasseh
are mentioned as two tribes. The name Joseph in the passage before us (Rev.
7:8) is doubtless designed, as remarked above, to refer to Ephraim.
(2.)
In this list (Rev. 7:7) the name of Levi is inserted among the
tribes. As already remarked, this name is not commonly inserted among the
tribes of the children of Israel, because that tribe, being devoted to the
sacerdotal office, had no inheritance in the division of the country, but was
scattered among the other tribes. See Josh. 14:3-4; 18:7. It may have been
inserted here, if this refers to the Christian church, to denote that the
ministers of the gospel, as well as other members of the church, would share in
the protection implied by the sealing; that is, to denote that no class in the
church would be excluded from the blessings of salvation.
(3.)
The name of one of the tribes‹Dan‹is omitted; so that by this
omission, and the insertion of the tribe of Levi, the original number of twelve
is preserved. There have been numerous conjectures as to the reason why the
tribe of Dan is omitted here, but none of the solutions proposed are without
difficulty. All that can be known, or regarded as probable, on the subject,
seems to be this:‹
(a)
As the tribe of Levi was usually omitted in an enumeration of the tribes,
because that tribe had no part in the inheritance of the Hebrew people in the
division of the land of Canaan, so there appear to have been instances in which
the names of some of the other tribes were omitted, the reason for which is not
given. Thus, in Deuteronomy 33, in the blessing pronounced by Moses on the
tribes just before his death, the name Simeon is omitted. In 1 Chronicles 4-8,
the names of Zebulun and Dan are both omitted. It would seem, therefore, that
the name of a tribe might be sometimes omitted without any particular reason
being specified.
(b)
It has been supposed by some that the name Dan was omitted
because that tribe was early devoted to idolatry, and continued idolatrous to
the time of the captivity. Of that fact there can be no doubt, for
it is expressly affirmed in Judg. 18:30; and that fact seems to be a sufficient
reason for the omission of the name. As being thus idolatrous, it was in a
measure separated from the people of God, and deserved not to be reckoned among
them; and in enumerating those who were the servants of God, there seemed to be
a propriety that a tribe devoted to idolatry should not be reckoned among the
number. This will account for the omission without resorting to the supposition
of Grotius, that the tribe of Dan was extinct at the time when the Apocalypse
was written‹a fact which also existed in regard to all the ten tribes; or to
the supposition of Andreas and others, that Dan is omitted because Antichrist
was to spring from that tribe‹a supposition which is alike without proof and
without probability. The fact that Dan was omitted cannot be supposed to have
any special significancy in the case before us. Such an omission is what, as we
have seen, might have occurred at any time in the enumeration of the tribes.
In
reference to the application of this portion of the book, (Rev. 7:1-8) or of
what is designed to be here represented, there has been, as might be expected,
a great variety of opinions. From the exposition of the words and phrases which
has been given, it is manifest that we are to look for a series of events like
the following:
(1.)
Some impending danger, or something that threatened to sweep everything
away‹like winds that were ready to blow on the earth.
(2.)
That tempest restrained or held back, as if the winds were held in check by an
angel, and were not suffered to sweep over the world.
(3.)
Some new influence or power, represented by an angel coming from the east‹the
great source of light‹that should designate the true church of God‹the servants
of the Most High.
(4.)
Some mark or note by which the true people of God could be designated, or by
which they could be known‹as if some name were impressed on their
foreheads.
(5.)
A selection or election of the number from a much greater number who were the
professed, but were not the true servants of God.
(6.)
A definite, though comparatively a small number thus designated out of the
whole mass.
(7.)
This number taken from all the divisions of the professed people of God, in
such numbers, and in such a manner, that it would be apparent that there would
be no partiality or favouritism; that is, that wherever the true servants of
God were found, they would be sealed and saved. These are things which lie on
the face of the passage, if the interpretation above given is correct, and in
its application it is necessary to find some facts that will properly
correspond with these things.
If
the interpretation of the sixth seal proposed above is correct, then we are to
look for the fulfilment of this in events that soon succeeded those which are
there referred to, or at least which had their commencement at about that time;
and the inquiry now is, whether there were any events that would accord
properly with the interpretation here proposed: that is, any impending and
spreading danger; any restraining of that danger; any process of designating
the servants of God so as to preserve them; anything like a designation or
selection of them from among the masses of the professed people of God? Now, in
respect to this, the following facts accord so well with what is demanded in
the interpretation, that it may be regarded as morally certain that they were
the things which were thus made to pass in vision before the mind of John. They
have at least this degree of probability, that if it were admitted that he
intended to describe them, the symbols which are actually employed are those
which it would have been proper to select to represent them.
I.
The impending danger, like winds restrained, that threatened to sweep
everything away, and to hasten on the end of the world. In reference to this,
there may have been two classes of impending danger‹that from the invasion of
the Northern hordes, referred to in the sixth seal, (chapter 6) and that from
the influx of error, that threatened the ruin of the church.
(a)
As to the former, the language used by John will accurately express the state
of things as it existed at the period supposed at the time of the sixth
seal‹the series of events introduced, now suspended, like the opening of the
seventh seal. The idea is that of nations pressing on to conquest; heaving like
tempests on the borders of the empire; overturning everything in their way;
spreading desolation by fire and sword, as if the world
were about to come to an end. The language used by Mr. Gibbon in describing the
times here referred to is so applicable, that it would seem almost as if he had
the symbols used by John in his eye. Speaking of the time of Constantine, he
says, "The threatening tempest of barbarians, which so soon
subverted the foundations of Roman greatness, was still repelled, or
suspended on the frontiers," i. 362. This language accurately
expresses the condition of the Roman world at the period succeeding the opening
of the sixth seal; the period of suspended judgments in order that the servants
of God might be sealed. See Note on Rev. 6:12-17.
The
nations which ultimately spread desolation through the empire hovered around
its borders, making occasional incursions into its territory; even carrying
their arms, as we have seen in some in stances, as far as Rome itself, but
still restrained from accomplishing the final purpose of overthrowing the city and
the empire. The church and the state alike were threatened with destruction,
and the impending wrath seemed only to beheld back as if to give
time to accomplish some other purpose.
(b)
At the same time, there was another class of evils which threatened to sweep
like a tempest over the church‹the evils of error in doctrine that sprang up on
the establishment of Christianity by Constantine. That fact was followed with a
great increase of professors of religion, who, for various purposes, crowded
into a church patronized by the state‹a condition of things which tended to do
more to destroy the church than all that had been done by persecution had
accomplished. This effect was natural; and the church became filled with those
who had yielded themselves to the Christian faith from motives of policy, and
who, having no true spiritual piety, were ready to embrace the most lax views
of religion, and to yield themselves to any form of error. Of this period, and
of the effect of the conversion of Constantine in this respect, Mr. Gibbon
makes the following remarks, strikingly illustrative of the view now taken of
the meaning of this passage: "The hopes of wealth and honour, the example of an
emperor, his exhortations, his irresistible smiles, diffused conviction among the
venal and obsequious crowds which usually fill the departments of a palace. The
cities which signalized a forward zeal, by the voluntary destruction of their
temples, were distinguished by municipal privileges, and rewarded with popular
donatives; and the new capital of the East gloried in the singular advantage,
that Constantinople was never profaned by the worship of idols. As the lower
ranks of society are governed by imitation, the conversion of those who
possessed any eminence of birth, of power, or of riches, was soon followed by
dependent multitudes. The salvation of the common people was purchased at an
easy rate, if it be true that, in one year, twelve thousand men were baptized
at Rome, besides a proportionable number of women and children, and that a
white garment, with twenty pieces of gold, had been promised by the emperor to
every convert," i. 425. At a time, therefore, when it might have been supposed
that, under the patronage of a Christian emperor, the truth would have spread
around the world, the church was exposed to one of its greatest dangers‹that
arising from the fact that it had become united with the state. About the same
time, also, there sprang up many of those forms of error which have spread
farthest over the Christian world, and which then threatened to become the
universal form of belief in the church. Of this class of doctrine were the
views of Arius, and the views of Pelagius‹forms of opinion which there were
strong reasons to fear might become the prevailing belief of the church, and
essentially change its character. About this time, also, the church was passing
into the state in which the Papacy would arise‹that dark and gloomy period in
which error would spread over the Christian world, and the true servants of God
would retire for a long period into obscurity. "We are now but a little way off
from the commencement of that noted period‹obscurely hinted at by Daniel,
plainly announced by John‹the twelve hundred and sixty prophetic days or years,
for which preparations of a very unusual kind, but requisite, doubtless, are
made. This period was to form the gloomiest, without exception, in the annals
of the world‹the period of Satan's highest success, and of the church's
greatest depression; and lest she should become during it utterly extinct, her
members, never so few as then, were all specially sealed. The long night passes
on, darkening as it advances; but the sealed company are not visible; they
disappear from the Apocalyptic stage, just as they then disappeared from the observation
of the world; for they fled away to escape the fire and the dungeons of their
persecutors, to hide in the hoary caves of the earth, or to inhabit the
untrodden regions of the wilderness, or to dwell beneath the shadow of the
Alps, or to enjoy fellowship with God, emancipated and unknown, in the deep
seclusion and gloom of some convent."‹The Seventh Vial, London,
1848, pp. 27, 28. These facts seem to me to show, with a considerable degree of
probability, what was designated by the suspense which occurred
after the opening of the sixth seal‹when the affairs of the world seemed to be
hastening on to the great catastrophe. At that period, the prophetic eye sees
the tendency of things suddenly arrested; the winds held back, the church
preserved, and a series of events introduced, intended to designate and to save
from the great mass of those who professedly consutured the "tribes of Israel,"
a definite number who should be in fact the true church of God.
II.
The facts, then, to which there is reference in checking the tendency of
things, and sealing the servants of God, may have been the following:
(a)
The preservation of the church from extinction during those calamitous periods
when ruin seemed about to sweep over the Roman world. Not only as a matter of
fact was there a suspension of those impending judgments that seemed to
threaten the very extinction of the empire by the invasion of the Northern
hordes, (See Note on Rev. 4:1 and following) but there were special
acts
in favour of the church, by which these fierce barbarians appeared not only to
be restrained from destroying the church, but to be influenced by tenderness
and sympathy for it, as if they were raised up to preserve it when Rome had
done all it could to destroy it. It would seem as if God restrained
the rage of these hordes for the sake of preserving his church; as if he had
touched their hearts that they might give to Christians an opportunity to
escape in the impending storm. We may refer here particularly to the conduct of
Alaric, king of the Goths, in the attack on Rome already referred to; and, as
usual, we may quote from Mr. Gibbon, who will not be suspected of a design to
contribute anything to the illustration of the Apocalypse. "At the hour of
midnight," says he, (vol. ii. pp. 260, 261,) "the Salarian gate was silently
opened, and the inhabitants were awakened by the tremendous sound of the Gothic
trumpet. Eleven hundred and sixty-three years after the foundation of Rome, the
imperial city, which had subdued and civilized so considerable a part of
mankind, was delivered to the licentious fury of the tribes of Germany and
Scythia. The proclamation of Alaric, when he forced his entrance into the
vanquished city, discovered, however, some regard for the laws of humanity and
religion. He encouraged his troops boldly to seize the rewards of valour, and
to enrich themselves with the spoils of a wealthy and effeminate people; but he
exhorted them at the same time to spare the lives of the unresisting citizens, and
to respect the churches of the apostles St. Peter and St. Paul as holy
and inviolable sanctuaries. While the barbarians roamed through the city
in quest of prey, the humble dwelling of an aged virgin, who had devoted her
life to the service of the altar, was forced open by one of the powerful Goths.
He immediately demanded, though in civil language, all the gold and silver in
her possession; and was astonished at the readiness with which she conducted
him to a splendid hoard of massy plate, of the richest materials and the most
curious workmanship. The barbarian viewed with wonder and delight this valuable
acquisition, till he was interrupted by a serious admonition, addressed to him
in the following words: ŒThese,' said she, Œare the consecrated vessels
belonging to St. Peter; if you presume to touch them, the sacrilegious deed
will remain on your consciences: for my part, I dare not keep what I am unable
to defend.' The Gothic captain, struck with reverential awe, despatched a
messenger to inform the king of the treasure which he had discovered; and
received a peremptory order from Alaric, that all the consecrated plate and
ornaments should be transported, without damage or delay, to the church of the
apostle. From the extremity, perhaps, of the Quirinal hill, to the distant
quarter of the Vatican, a numerous detachment of the Goths, marching in order
of battle through the principal streets, protected, with glittering arms, the
long train of their devout companions, who bore aloft on their heads the sacred
vessels of gold and silver; and the martial shouts of the barbarians were
mingled with the sound of religious psalmody. From all the adjacent houses, a
crowd of Christians hastened to join this edifying procession; and a multitude
of fugitives, without distinction of age or rank, or even of sect, had the good
fortune to escape to the secure and hospitable sanctuary of the vatican." In a
note, Mr. Gibbon adds: "According to Isidore, Alaric himself was heard to say,
that he waged war with the Romans, and not with the apostles." He adds also,
(p. 261), "The learned work concerning the City of God was
professedly composed by St. Augustine to justify the ways of Providence in the
destruction of the Roman greatness. He celebrates with peculiar satisfaction
this memorable triumph of Christ; and insults his adversaries by challenging
them to produce some similar example of a town taken by storm, in which the
fabulous gods of antiquity had been able to protect either themselves or their
deluded rotaries." We may refer here, also, to that work of Augustine as
illustrating the passage before us. In book i., chapter, 2, he defends this
position, that "there never was war in which the conquerors would spare them
whom they conquered for the gods they worshipped"‹referring particularly to the
sacking of Troy; in chapter 3, he appeals to the example of Troy; in chapter 4,
he appeals to the sanctuary of Juno, in Troy; in chapter 6, he shows that the
Romans never spared the temples of those cities which they destroyed; and in
chapter 6, he maintains that the fact that mercy was shown by the barbarians in
the sacking of Rome was "through the power of the name of Jesus Christ." In
illustration of this, he says, "Therefore, all the spoil, murder, violence, and
affliction, that in this fresh calamity came upon Rome, were nothing but the
ordinary effects following the custom of war. But that which was so
unaccustomed, that the savage nature of the barbarians should put on a new
shape, and appear so merciful, that it would make choice of great and spacious
churches, to fill with such as it meant to show pity on, from which none should
be haled to slaughter or slavery, in which none should be hurt, to which many
by their courteous foes should be conducted, and out of which none should be
led into bondage; this is due to the name of Christ, this is due to the
Christian profession; he that seeth not is blind; he that seeth and praiseth it
not is unthankful; he that hinders him that praiseth it is mad."‹City of God, p. 11,
London, 1620. Such a preservation of Christians; such a suspension of
judgments, when all things seemed to be on the verge of ruin, would not be inappropriately represented
by winds that threatened to sweep over the world; by the staying of those winds
by some remarkable power, as by an angel; and by the special interposition
which spared the church in the tumults and terrors of a siege, and of the
sacking of a city.
(b)
There may have been a reference to another class of Divine interpositions
at about the same time, to designate the true servants of God. It has been
already remarked, that from the time when Constantine took the church under his
patronage, and it became connected with the state, there was a large accession
of nominal professors in the church, producing a great corruption in regard to
spiritual religion, and an extended prevalence of error. Now, the delay here
referred to, between the opening of the sixth and seventh seals, may have
referred to the fact that, during this period, the true doctrines of
Christianity would be vindicated and established in such away that the servants
of God would be "sealed" and designated in contradistinction from the great
mass of the professed followers of Christ, and from the numerous advocates of
error. From that mass, a certain and definite number was to be
sealed‹implying, as we have seen, that there would be a selection, or that
there would be something which would discriminate them from
the multitudes as the true servants of God. This is represented by an angel
coming from the east: the angel representing the new heavenly influence coming
upon the church; and the coming from the east‹as the east is the quarter where
the sun rises‹denoting that it came from the source and fountain of light‹that
is, God. The "sealing" would denote anything in this new influence or
manifestation which would mark the true children of God, and would be
appropriately employed to designate any doctrines which would keep up true
religion in the world; which would preserve correct views about God, the way of
salvation, and the nature of true religion, and which would thus determine
where the church of God really was. If there should be a tendency in the church
to degenerate into formality; if the rules of discipline should be relaxed; if
error should prevail as to what constitutes spiritual religion; and if there
should be a new influence at that time which would distinguish those who were
the children of God from those who were not, this would be
appropriately represented by the angel from the east, and by the sealing of the
servants of God. Now it requires but a slight knowledge of the history of the
Roman empire, and of the church, at the period supposed here to be referred to,
to perceive that all this occurred. There was a large influx of professed
converts. There was a vast increase of worldliness. There was a wide diffusion
of error. Religion was fast becoming mere formalism. The true church was
apparently fast verging to ruin. At this period God raised up distinguished
men‹as if they had been angels ascending from the east‹who came as with the
"seal of the living God"‹the doctrines of grace, and just views of spiritual
religion-to designate who were, and who were not, the "true servants of God"
among the multitudes who professed to be his followers. Such were the doctrines
of Athanasius and Augustine‹those great doctrines on which the very existence
of the true church has in all ages depended. The doctrines thus illustrated and
defended were fitted to make a broad line of distinction between the true
church and the world, and this would be well represented by the symbol employed
here‹for it is by these doctrines that the true people of God are sealed and
confirmed. On this subject, comp. Elliott, i. 279-292. The general sense here
intended to be expressed is, that there was at the period referred to, after
the conversion of Constantine, a decided tendency to a worldly, formal, lax
kind of religion in the church; a very prevalent denial of the doctrine of the
Trinity and of the doctrines of grace; a lax mode of admitting members to the
church, with little or no evidence of true conversion; a disposition to
attribute saving grace to the ordinances of religion, and especially to
baptism; a disposition to rely on the outward ceremonies of religion, with
little acquaintance with its spiritual power; and a general breaking down of
the barriers between the church and the world, as there is usually in a time of
outward prosperity, and especially when the church is connected with the state.
At this time there arose another set of influences well represented by the
angel coming from the east, and sealing the true servants of God, in
illustration and confirmation of the true doctrines of Christianity‹doctrines
on which the spirituality of the church has always depended: the doctrines of
the Trinity, the atonement, the depravity of man, regeneration by the agency of
the Holy Spirit, justification by faith, the sovereignty of God, and kindred
doctrines. Such doctrines have in all ages served to determine where the true
church is, and to designate and "seal" the servants of the Most High.
(c)
This process of "sealing" may be regarded as continued during the long night of
Papal darkness that was coming upon the church, when error would abound, and
the religion of forms would be triumphant. Even then, in places obscure and
unknown, the work of sealing the true servants of God might be going
forward‹for even in those times of gloomy night there were those,
though comparatively few in number, who loved the truth, and who were the real
servants of God. The number of the elect were filling up, for even in the
darkest times there were those who loved the cause of spiritual religion, and
who bore upon them the impress of the "seal of the living God." Such appears to
have been the intent of this sealing vision: a staying of the desolation that,
in various forms, was sweeping over the world, in order that the true church
might be safe, and that a large number, from all parts of the church, might be
sealed and designated as the true servants of God. The winds, that blowed from
all quarters, were stayed as if by mighty angels. A new influence, from the
great source of light, came in to designate those who were the true servants of
the Most High, as if an angel had come from the rising sun with the seal of the
living God, to impress it on their foreheads. A selection was made out of a
church filling up with formalists, and in which the true doctrines of spiritual
religion were fast fading away, of those who could be designated as the true
servants of God. By their creed, and their lives, and their spirit, and their
profession, they could be designated as the true servants of God, as if a
visible mark were impressed on their foreheads. This selection was confined to
no place, no class, no tribe, no denomination. It was taken from the whole of
Israel, in such numbers that it could be seen that none of the tribes were
excluded from the honour, but that, wherever the true spirit of religion was,
God was acknowledging these tribes‹or churches‹as his, and there he was gathering
a people to himself. This would be long continued, until new scenes would open,
and the eye would rest on other developments in the series of symbols,
revealing the glorious host of the redeemed emerging from darkness, and in
countless numbers triumphing before the throne.
9. After this. Gr., "After these things"‹meta tauta: that is,
after I saw these things thus represented, I had another vision. This would
undoubtedly imply, not only that he saw these things after he had
seen the sealing of the hundred and forty-four thousand, but that they would occur
subsequently to that. But he does not state whether they would immediately
occur, or whether other things might not intervene. As a matter of fact, the
vision seems to be transferred from earth to heaven‹for the multitudes which he
saw appeared "before the throne," (Rev. 7:9) that is, before the throne of God
in heaven. The design seems to be to carry the mind forward quite beyond the
storms and tempests of earth‹the scenes of woe and sorrow‹the days of error,
darkness, declension, and persecution into that period when the church should
be triumphant in heaven. Instead, therefore, of leaving the impression that the
hundred and forty-four thousand would be all that would
be saved, the eye is directed to an innumerable host, gathered from all ages,
all climes, and all people, triumphant in glory. The multitude that John thus
saw was not, therefore, I apprehend, the same as the hundred and forty- four
thousand, but a far greater number‹the whole assembled host of the redeemed in
heaven, gathered there as victors, with palm-branches, the symbols of
triumph, in their hands. The object of the vision is to cheer those who
are desponding in times of religious declension and in seasons of persecution,
and when the number of true Christians seems to be small, with the assurance
that an immense host shall be redeemed from our world, and be gathered
triumphant before the throne.
I
beheld. That is, he saw them before the throne. The vision is
transferred from earth to heaven; from the contemplation of the scene when
desolation seemed to impend over the world, and when comparatively few in
number were "sealed" as the servants of God, to the time when the redeemed
would be triumphant, and when a host which no man can number would stand before
God.
And,
lo. Indicating surprise. A vast host burst upon the view. Instead of
the comparatively few who were sealed, an innumerable company were presented to
his vision, and surprise was the natural effect.
A
great multitude. Instead of the comparatively small number on which the attention
had been fixed.
Which
no man could number. The number was so great that no one could count them, and John,
therefore, did not attempt to do it. This is such a statement as one would make
who should have a view of all the redeemed in heaven. It would appear to be a
number beyond all power of computation. This representation is in strong
contrast with a very common opinion that only a few will be saved. The
representation in the Bible is, that immense hosts of the human race will be
saved; and though vast numbers will be lost, and though at any particular
period of the world hitherto it may seem that few have been in the path to
life, yet we have every reason to believe that, taking the race at large, and
estimating it as a whole, a vast majority of the whole will be brought to
heaven. For the true religion is yet to spread all over the world, and perhaps
for many, many thousands of years, piety is to be as prevalent as sin has been;
and in that long and happy time of the world's history we may hope that the
numbers of the saved may surpass all who have been lost in past periods, beyond
any power of computation. See Note on Rev. 20:3, and through verse 6.
Of
all nations. Not only of Jews; not only of the nations which in the time of
the sealing vision had embraced the gospel, but of all the nations of the
earth. This implies two things:
(a)
that the gospel would be preached among all nations; and
(b)
that even when it was thus preached to them they would keep up their national
characteristics. There can be no hope of blending all the nations of the earth
under one visible sovereignty. They may all be subjected to the spiritual reign
of the Redeemer, but still there is no reason to suppose that they will not
have their distinct organizations and laws.
And
kindreds‹fulwn This word properly refers to those who are descended from a
common ancestry, and hence denotes a race, lineage, kindred. It was applied to
the tribes of Israel, as derived from the same ancestor, and for the same
reason might be applied to a clan, and thence to any division in a
nation, or to a nation itself‹properly retaining the notion that it was
descended from a common ancestor. Here it would seem to refer to a smaller
class than a nation‹the different clans of which a nation might be composed.
And
people‹lawn. This word refers properly to a people or community as a mass, without
reference to its origin or any of its divisions. The former word would be used
by one who should look upon a nation as made up of portions of distinct
languages, clans, or families; this word would be used by one who should look
on such an assembled people as a mere mass of human beings, with no reference
to their difference of clanship, origin, or language.
And
tongues. Languages. This word would refer also to the inhabitants of the
earth, considered with respect to the fact that they speak different languages.
The use of particular languages does not designate the precise boundaries of
nations‹for often many people speaking different languages are united as one
nation, and often those who speak the same language constitute distinct
nations. The view, therefore, with which one would look upon the dwellers on
the earth, in the use of the word tongues or languages, would be,
not as divided into nations; not with reference to their lineage or clanship;
and not as a mere mass without reference to any distinction, but as divided by speech. The
meaning of the whole is, that persons from all parts of the earth, as contemplated
in these points of view, would be among the redeemed. Compare Notes on Dan.
3:4; Dan. 4:1.
Stood
before the throne. The throne of God.
See Note on Rev. 4:2.
The
throne is there represented as set up in heaven, and the vision here is a
vision of what will occur in heaven. It is designed to carry the thoughts
beyond all the scenes of conflict, strife, and persecution on earth, to the
time when the church shall be triumphant in glory‹when all storms shall have
passed by; when all persecutions shall have ceased; when all revolutions shall
have occurred; when all the elect‹not only the hundred and forty-four thousand
of the sealed, but of all nations and times‹shall have been gathered in. There
was a beautiful propriety in this vision. John saw the tempests stayed, as by
the might of angels. He saw a new influence and power that would seal the true
servants of God. But those tempests were stayed only for a time, and there were
more awful visions in reserve than any which had been exhibited revisions of
woe and sorrow, of persecution and of death. It was appropriate, therefore,
just at this moment of calm suspense‹of delayed judgments‹to suffer the mind to
rest on the triumphant close of the whole in heaven, when a countless host
would be gathered there with palms in their hands, uniting with angels in the
worship of God. The mind, by the contemplation of this beautiful vision, would
be refreshed and strengthened for the disclosure of the awful scenes which were
to occur on the sounding of the trumpets under the seventh seal. The simple
idea is, that, amidst the storms and tempests of life‹scenes of existing or
impending trouble and wrath‹it is well to let the eye rest on the scene of the
final triumph, when innumerable hosts of the redeemed shall stand before God,
and when sorrow shall be known no more.
And
before the Lamb. In the midst of the throne‹in heaven. See Note on Rev. 5:6
Clothed
with white robes. The emblems of innocence or righteousness, uniformly represented
as the raiment of the inhabitants of heaven. See Notes on Rev. 3:4; Rev. 6:11.
And
palms in their hands. Emblems of victory. Branches of the palm-tree were carried by
the victors in the athletic contests of Greece and Rome, and in triumphal
processions. See Note on Matt. 21:8.
The
palm-tree‹straight, elevated, majestic‹was an appropriate emblem of triumph.
The portion of it which was borne in victory was the long leaf which
shoots out from the top Of the tree. See Eschenberg, Manual of Class. Lit. p.
243, and Lev. 23:40: "And ye shall take you on the first day the boughs of
goodly trees, branches of palm-trees," etc. So in the Saviour's triumphal entry
into Jerusalem, (John 12:12-13) "On the next day much people‹took branches of
palm-trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna."
10. And cried with a loud voice. Compare Zech. 4:7. This is
expressive of the greatness of their joy; the ardour and earnestness of their
praise.
Salvation
to our God. The word rendered salvation‹swthria‹means
properly safety, deliverance, preservation; then welfare or prosperity; then
victory; then, in a Christian sense, deliverance from punishment and admission
to eternal life. Here the idea seems to be, that their deliverance from sin,
danger, persecution, and death, was to be ascribed solely to God. It cannot be
meant, as the words would seem to imply, that they desired that God might have
salvation; but the sense is, that their salvation was to be
attributed entirely to him. This will undoubtedly be the song of the released
for ever, and all who reach the heavenly world will feel that they owe their
deliverance from eternal death, and their admission to glory, wholly to him.
Professor Robinson (Lex.) renders the word here victory. The fair
meaning is, that whatever is included in the word salvation will be due
to God alone‹the deliverance from sin, danger, and death; the triumph over
every foe; the resurrection from the grave; the rescue from eternal burnings;
the admission to a holy heaven‹victory in all that that word
implies will be due to God.
Which
sitteth upon the throne. See Note on Rev. 4:2.
And
unto the Lamb. See Note on Rev. 5:6.
God
the Father, and He who is the Lamb of God, alike claim the honour of salvation.
It is observable here, that the redeemed ascribe their salvation to the Lamb as
well as to Him who is on the throne. Could they do this if he who is referred
to as the "Lamb" were a mere man? Could they if he were an Could angel? they if
he were not equal with the Father? Do those who are in heaven worship a
creature? Will they unite a created being with the Anointed One in acts of
solemn adoration and praise?
11. And all the angels stood round about the throne. See Note
on Rev. 5:11.
And
about the elders. See Note on Rev. 4:4
And
the four beasts. See Note on Rev. 4:6.
The
meaning is, that the angels stood in the outer circle, or outside of the
elders and the four living creatures. The redeemed, it is manifest, occupied
the inner circle, and were near the throne, though their precise location is
not mentioned. The angels sympathize with the church redeemed and triumphant,
as they did with the church in its conflicts and trials, and they now
appropriately unite with that church in adoring and praising God. They see, in
that redemption, new displays of the character of God, and they rejoice that
that church is rescued from its troubles, and is now brought triumphant to
heaven.
And
fell before the throne on their faces. The usual position of profound
adoration, Rev. 4:10; 5:8.
And
worshipped God. See Notes on Rev. 5:11; Rev. 5:12.
12 Saying, Amen. See Note on Rev. 1:7.
The
word Amen here is a word strongly affirming the truth of what is said, or
expressing hearty assent to it. It may be uttered, as expressing this, either
in the beginning or end of a sentence. Thus wills are commonly
commenced, "In the name of God, Amen."
Blessings
and glory, etc. Substantially the same ascription of praise occurs in Rev.
5:12. See Note on Rev. 5:12.
The
general idea is, that the highest kind of praise is to be ascribed to God;
everything excellent in character is to be attributed to him; every blessing
which is received is to be traced to him. The order of the
words indeed is changed, but the sense is substantially the same. In the former
case (Rev. 5:12) the ascription of praise is to the Lamb‹the Son of God; here
it is to God. In both instances the worship is described as rendered in heaven;
and the use of the language shows that God and the Lamb are regarded in heaven
as entitled to equal praise. The only words found here which do not occur in Rev.
5:12 are thanksgiving and might‹words which require no
particular explanation.
13. And one of the elders. See Note on Rev. 4:4.
That
is, as there understood, one of the representatives of the church before the
throne.
Answered. The word answer, with us,
means to reply to something which has been said. In the Bible, however, the
word is not unfrequently used in the beginning of a
speech, where nothing has been said‹as if it were a reply to something that might be said on
the subject; or to something that is passing through the mind of another; or to
something in the case under consideration which suggests an inquiry. Compare
Isa. 65:24; Dan. 2:26; Acts 5:8.
Thus
it is used here. John was looking on the host, and reflecting on the state of
things; and to the train of thought passing through his mind the angel answered by an
inquiry as to a part of that host. Professor Stuart renders it accosted me.
What
are these which are arrayed in white robes? Who are these?
The object evidently is to bring the case of these persons more particularly
into view. The vast host with branches of palm had attracted the attention of
John, but it was the object of the speaker to turn his thoughts to a particular
part of the host‹the martyrs who stood among them. He would seem, therefore, to
have turned to a particular portion of the immense multitude of the redeemed,
and by an emphasis on the word these‹"Who are these?"‹to have
fixed the eye upon them. All those who are before the throne are
represented as clothed in white robes, (Rev. 7:9) but the eye might be directed
to a particular part of them as grouped together, and as having something
peculiar in their position or appearance. There was a propriety in thus
directing the mind of John to the martyrs as triumphing in heaven, in a time
when the churches were suffering persecution, and in view of the vision which
he had had of times of darkness and calamity coming upon the world at the
opening of the sixth seal. Beyond all the scenes of sorrow and grief, he was
permitted to see the martyrs triumphing in heaven.
Arrayed
in white robes. See Note on Rev. 7:9.
And
whence came they? The object is to fix the attention more distinctly on what is
said of them, that they came up out of great tribulation.
14. And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. The word sir in this
place‹kurie, lord‹is a form
of respectful address, such as would be used when speaking to a superior, Gen.
43:20; Matt. 13:27; Matt. 21:30; 27:63; John 4:11, 15, 19, 49; 5:7; 12:21;
20:15.
The
simple meaning of the phrase "thou knowest" is, that he who had asked the
question must be better informed than he to whom he had proposed it. It is, on
the part of John, a modest confession that he did not know, or could not be
presumed to know, and at the same time the respectful utterance of an opinion
that he who addressed this question to him must be in possession of this
knowledge.
And
he said unto me. Not offended with the reply, and ready, as he had evidently
intended to do, to give him the information which he needed.
These
are they which came out of great tribulation. The word rendered tribulation‹qliqiß‹is a word
of general character, meaning affliction, though perhaps there is
here an allusion to persecution. The sense, however, would be better expressed
by the phrase great trials. The object seems to have
been to set before the mind of the apostle a view of those who had suffered
much, and who by their sufferings had been sanctified and prepared for heaven,
in order to encourage those who might be yet called to suffer.
And
have washed their robes. To wit, in the blood of the Lamb.
And
made them white in the blood of the Lamb. There is some incongruity in
saying that they had made them white in the blood of the
Lamb; and the meaning therefore must be, that they had cleansed or purified them in
that blood. Under the ancient ritual, various things about the sanctuary were cleansed from
ceremonial defilement by the sprinkling of blood on them‹the blood of
sacrifice. In accordance with that usage the blood of the Lamb‹of the Lord
Jesus‹is said to cleanse and purify. John sees a great company with white
robes. The means by which it is said they became white or pure is the blood of
the Lamb. It is not said that they were made white as the result of their
sufferings or their afflictions, but by the blood of the Lamb. The course of
thought here is such that it would be natural to suppose that, if at any time
the great deeds or the sufferings of the saints could contribute to the fact
that they will wear white robes in heaven, this is an occasion on which there
might be such a reference. But there is no allusion to that. It is not by their
own sufferings and trials, their persecutions and sorrows, that they are made
holy, but by the blood of the Lamb that had been shed for sinners. This
reference to the blood of the Lamb is one of the incidental proofs that occur
so frequently in the Scriptures of the reality of the atonement. It could be
only in allusion to that, and with an implied belief in that, that the blood of
the Lamb could be referred to as cleansing the robes of the saints in heaven.
If he shed his blood merely as other men have done; if he died only as a
martyr, what propriety would there have been in referring to his blood more
than to the blood of any other martyr? And what influence could the blood of any martyr have
in cleansing the robes of the saints heaven? The fact is, that if that were
all, such language would be unmeaning. It is never used except in connexion
with the blood of Christ; and the language of the Bible everywhere is such as
would be employed on the supposition that he shed his blood to make expiation
for sin, and on no other supposition. On the general meaning of the language
used here, and the sentiment expressed, See Notes on Heb. 9:14; 1 John 1:7.
15. Therefore are they before the throne of God. The reason
why they are there is to be traced to the fact that the Lamb shed his blood to
make expiation for sin. No other reason can be given why any one of the human
race is in heaven; and that is reason enough why any of that race are there.
And
serve him day and night in his temple. That is, continually or
constantly. Day and night constitute the whole of time, and this expression,
therefore, denotes constant and uninterrupted service. On earth, toil is suspended
by the return of night, and the service of God is intermitted by the necessity
of rest; in heaven, as there will be no weariness, there will be no need of
intermission, and the service of God, varied doubtless to meet the state of the
mind, will be continued for ever. The phrase "to serve him in his temple"
refers undoubtedly to heaven, regarded as the temple or holy dwelling-place of
God. See Note on Rev. 1:6.
And
he that sitteth on the throne. God. See Note on Rev. 4:2.
Shall
dwell among them‹skhnwsei. This word properly means, to tent, to pitch a tent; and, in
the New Testament, to dwell as in tents. The meaning here is, that God would
dwell among them as in a tent, or would have his abode with them. Perhaps the
allusion is to the tabernacle in the wilderness. That was regarded as the
peculiar dwelling-place of God, and that always occupied a central place among
the tribes of Israel. So in heaven‹there will be the consciousness always that
God dwells there among his people, and that the redeemed are gathered around
him in his own house. Professor Stuart renders this, it seems to me with less
beauty and propriety, "will spread his tent over them," as meaning that he
would receive them into intimate connexion and union with him, and offer them
his protection: Compare Rev. 21:3.
16. They shall hunger no more. A considerable portion of
the redeemed who will be there, were, when on the earth, subjected to the evils
of famine; many who perished with hunger. In heaven, they will be subjected to
that evil no more, for there will be no want that will not be supplied. The
bodies which the redeemed will have‹spiritual bodies (1 Cor. 15:44)‹will
doubtless be such as will be nourished in some other way than by food, if they
require any nourishment; and whatever that nourishment may be, it will be fully
supplied. The passage here is taken from Isa. 49:10: "They shall not hunger nor
thirst; neither shall the heat nor sun smite them." See Note on Isa. 49:10.
Neither
thirst any more. As multitudes of the redeemed have been subjected to the evils
of hunger, so have multitudes also been subjected to the pains of thirst. In
prison; in pathless deserts; in times of drought, when wells and fountains were
dried up, they have suffered from this cause‹a cause producing as intense
suffering perhaps as any that man endures. Compare Exod. 17:3; Psa. 63:1; Lam.
4:4; 2 Cor. 11:27.
It
is easy to conceive of persons suffering so intensely from thirst that the
highest vision of felicity would be such a promise as that in the words before
us‹"neither thirst any more."
Neither
shall the sun light on them. It is hardly necessary, perhaps, to say that
the word light here does not mean to enlighten, to give light to, to shine on.
The Greek is pesh‹fall on‹and the reference, probably, is to the intense
and burning heat of the sun, commonly called a sun-stroke. Excessive
heat of the sun, causing great pain or sudden death, is not a very uncommon
thing among us, and must have been more common in the warm climates and burning
sands of the countries in the vicinity of Palestine. The meaning here is, that
in heaven they would be free from this calamity.
Nor
any heat. In Isa. 49:10, from which place this is quoted, the expression
is: bDrDv sharab, properly
denoting heat or burning, and particularly the mirage, the
excessive heat of a sandy desert producing a vapour which has a striking
resemblance to water, and which often misleads the unwary traveller by its
deceptive appearance. See Note on Isa. 35:7.
The
expression here is equivalent to intense heat; and the meaning is, that in
heaven the redeemed will not be subjected to any such suffering as the
traveller often experiences in the burning sands of the desert. The language
would convey a most grateful idea to those who had been subjected to these
sufferings, and is one form of saying that, in heaven, the redeemed will be
delivered from the ills which they suffer in this life. Perhaps the whole image
here is that of travellers who have been on a long journey, exposed to hunger
and thirst, wandering in the burning sands of the desert, and exposed to the
fiery rays of the sun, at length reaching their quiet and peaceful home, where
they would find safety and abundance. The believer's journey from earth to
heaven is such a pilgrimage.
17. For the Lamb, which is in the midst of the throne. See Note
on Rev. 5:6.
He
is still the great agent in promoting the happiness of the redeemed in heaven.
Shall
feed them. Rather, shall exercise over them the office of a shepherd‹pomanei. This
includes much more than mere feeding. It embraces all the care which a
shepherd takes of his flock‹watching them, providing for them, guarding them
from danger. Compare Psa. 23:1-2, 6; 36:8.
See
Note on Isa. 40:11
And
shall lead them unto living fountains of waters. Living fountains
refer to running streams, as contrasted with standing water and stagnant pools.
See Note on John 4:10.
The
allusion is undoubtedly to the happiness of heaven, represented as fresh and
ever-flowing, like streams in the desert. No image of happiness, perhaps, is
more vivid, or would be more striking to an Oriental, than that of such
fountains flowing in sandy and burning wastes. The word living here must
refer to the fact that that happiness will be perennial. These fountains will
always bubble; these streams will never dry up. The thirst for salvation will
always be gratified; the soul will always be made happy.
And
God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes. This is a new image of
happiness taken from another place in Isaiah, (Isa. 25:8) "The Lord God will
wipe away tears from off all faces." The expression is one of exquisite
tenderness and beauty. The poet Burns said that he could never read this
without being affected to weeping. Of all the negative
descriptions of heaven, there is no one perhaps that would be better adapted to
produce consolation than this. This is a world of weeping‹a vale of tears.
Philosophers have sought a brief definition of man, and have sought in vain.
Would there be any better description of him, as representing the reality of
his condition here, than to say that he is one who weeps? Who is
there of the human family that has not shed a tear? Who that has not wept over
the grave of a friend; over his own losses and cares; over his disappointments;
over the treatment he has received from others; over his sins; over the
follies, vices, and woes of his fellow-men? And what a change would it make in
our world if it could be said that hence forward not another tear would be
shed; not a head would ever be bowed again in grief! Yet this is to be the
condition of heaven. In that world there is to be no pain, no disappointment,
no bereavement. No friend is to lie in dreadful agony on a sick bed; no grave
is to be opened to receive a parent, a wife, a child; no gloomy prospect of
death is to draw tears of sorrow from the eyes. To that blessed world, when our
eyes run down with tears, are we permitted to look forward; and the prospect of
such a world should contribute to wipe away our tears here‹for all our sorrows
will soon be over. As already remarked, there was a beautiful propriety, at a
time when such calamities impended over the church and the world‹when there was
such a certainty of persecution and sorrow‹in permitting the mind to rest on
the contemplation of these happy scenes in heaven, where all the redeemed, in
white robes, and with palms of victory in their hands, would be gathered before
the throne. To us also now, amidst the trials of the present life‹when friends
leave us; when sickness comes; when our hopes are blasted; when calumnies and
reproaches come upon us; when, standing on the verge of the grave, and looking
down into the cold tomb, the eyes pour forth floods of tears‹it is a blessed
privilege to be permitted to look forward to that brighter scene in heaven, where
not a pang shall ever be felt, and not a tear shall ever be shed.